Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$58.52
▼ $0.75 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:03 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$57.83 - $63.09
52-Week Range
$41.87 - $133.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$52.80
Resistance
$75.53
ASTS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+52.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$112.81 vs. price $58.52 (-292.8%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
40
Risk
56
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
38
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **AST SpaceMobile** has centered on its stock performance, spectrum regulatory efforts, and investor confidence. Headlines highlight AST’s nearly three-week high stock price, its pursuit of additional satellite tests backed by the U.S. government, and competition with Starlink. Additionally, a director’s significant share purchase—valued at over $140 million—signals optimism about the company’s expansion. The focus also includes the broader satellite industry’s spectrum battles, positioning AST as a key player in mobile broadband innovation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
62
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
38
Technical
40
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
62
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is overwhelmingly consistent with **loss aversion**, as the 33.4% drop over three months and elevated trading volume suggest traders are prioritizing damage control over speculative bets. The narrative gap (-18) further implies a disconnect between market sentiment (optimistic at 44) and reality (62), reinforcing caution. The absence of herd behavior or euphoria—despite positive sentiment—points to selective risk aversion rather than blind following. The key question is whether the current volume spike reflects last-ditch selling or a tactical rebalancing ahead of a potential bottom, given the lack of extreme volatility or panic signals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:14 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The satellite race everyone is watching plays out on launchpads, but the contest that determines who profits runs through a far less visible battlefield: the radio frequencies fighting to reach the phone in your pocket."
"Cisneros increased her indirect holdings to 2.4 million shares valued at $140.7 million, signaling continued confidence as the satellite-broadband company expands its network."
"AST SpaceMobile has significant upside potential."
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing stability and others warning of fragility. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology model and Walter Bagehot’s liquidity-focused framework—suggest it avoids speculative frenzy and could weather financial stress, while Peter Lynch and Howard Marks (cycle) lean cautiously optimistic, flagging it as mid-cycle without obvious overheating. Conversely, the lowest scores—from Morgan Housel’s volatility aversion and Jesse Livermore’s trend-following rules—paint a starker picture, dismissing it as either too unstable or counter-trend, while Graham’s defensive criteria and Fisher’s quality standards outright reject it as lacking fundamental strength. The split reflects a tension between resilience (liquidity, crowd calm) and structural weaknesses (growth opacity, volatility, or trend resistance), leaving no clear consensus.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 83
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 39
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 30
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 9
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-482.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-14.3%
ROA
-6.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$2.34B
Total Debt
$2.22B
Current Ratio
16.35
Debt/Equity
0.93
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$58.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$112.81
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-292.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-1.42B | $-1.30B |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-1.70B | $-1.43B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-1.93B | $-1.49B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-2.09B | $-1.48B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-2.14B | $-1.39B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.14B
Terminal Value
$-33.71B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-21.91B
Enterprise Value
$-28.99B
Net Debt
$-116.10M
Equity Value
$-28.88B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.35
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 4 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ASTS currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ASTS's estimated fair value is -$112.81, which is 292.8% below the current price of $58.52. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ASTS's technical score is 40/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Revenue growth (last year): 1505.2%; Calmar: 2.26 (3y annualized return 154.5% / max drawdown 68.4%).
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$112.81 vs. price $58.52 (-292.8%); Net margin: -482.2% (negative); ATR: 6.7% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ASTS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisneros Adriana | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 8,768 | +8,768 | $57.00 |
| Cisneros Adriana | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 670 | +670 | $58.87 |
| Cisneros Adriana | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 1,384 | +1,384 | $57.79 |
| Yao Huiwen | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 19.8.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | — |
| Yao Huiwen | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 19.8.2026 | 40,000 | +40,000 | $0.06 |
| Turco Christopher Edward | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 200,500 | +200,000 | — |
| Bernal Maya | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Turco Christopher Edward | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | — |
| Johnson Andrew Martin | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Avellan Abel Antonio | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Gupta Shanti B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Wisniewski Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Wisniewski Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 12,297 | -12,297 | $70.98 |
| Gupta Shanti B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 12,767 | -12,767 | $70.98 |
| Johnson Andrew Martin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 9,838 | -9,838 | $70.98 |
| Johnson Andrew Martin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 12,297 | -12,297 | $70.98 |
| Bernal Maya | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 2,919 | -2,919 | $70.98 |
| Wisniewski Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 9,838 | -9,838 | $70.98 |
| Avellan Abel Antonio | Other Transaction | 22.6.2026 | 2,500,000 | +2,500,000 | — |
| Avellan Abel Antonio | Other Transaction | 22.6.2026 | 2,500,000 | +2,500,000 | — |
| Torres Julio A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 2,124 | +2,124 | — |
| RUBIN RONALD L | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 2,124 | +2,124 | — |
| Cisneros Adriana | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 2,124 | +2,124 | — |
| RUBIN RONALD L | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 73,363 | +2,124 | — |
| SARNOFF RICHARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 80,363 | +2,124 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
64,140,398 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 56,847,259 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology