Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$5.49
▲ $0.09 (+1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/16 05:11 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$290.92M
Day Range
$5.38 - $5.50
52-Week Range
$5.27 - $8.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
ASLE is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-37.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 63.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$10.09 vs. price $5.49 (-283.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
47
Value
43
Momentum
13
Risk
54
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **AerSale Corporation (ASLE)** has centered on its **financial risks and operational challenges**, particularly in Q2 2026. Analysts highlight **cash-burning concerns**, **delays in asset monetization**, and **margin pressures**, leading to a **lowered price target** by RBC Capital. The company’s small-cap status and speculative nature have also drawn attention, with some outlets flagging it as **high-risk** despite its strong fundamentals being occasionally noted. Investor focus remains on its ability to execute monetization strategies amid market skepticism.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AerSale Corporation. News trend score: 26. Reason: 7 of the last 19 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
51
Technical
13
Valuation
43
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-17%
Market Narrative
29
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
-8
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ASLE is dominated by **loss aversion**, as the 8.9% three-month decline and modest trading volume suggest investors are cautious, possibly holding or reducing positions to avoid further losses. The lack of extreme momentum, volatility, or peer alignment rules out FOMO, panic, or herding. The narrative gap is minimal, indicating no major disconnect between market perception and fundamentals. The key open question is whether the stock will stabilize near support or if further downside could trigger deeper loss-avoidance-driven selling.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:31 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"3 Small-Cap Stocks We Find Risky — Investors looking for hidden gems should keep an eye on small-cap stocks because they’re frequently overlooked by Wall Street. Many opportunities exist in this part of the market, but it is also a high-risk, high-reward environment"
"ASLE Q2 Deep Dive: Asset Monetization Delays and Margin Pressures Dominate Results"
"RBC Capital analyst Ken Herbert maintains AerSale (NASDAQ:ASLE) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from $8 to $7"
"AerSale Q2 results showed sharply lower revenue and EBITDA, driven by absent flight equipment sales and underutilized MRO capacity"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors seeing strong potential while others flag significant concerns. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology analysis (96) and Peter Lynch’s growth-focused model (74)—suggest the stock may avoid speculative bubbles or offer undervalued upside, respectively. Meanwhile, Howard Marks’ risk-pricing framework (81) and Jack Schwager’s disciplined setup (66) lean cautiously optimistic, viewing it as a reasonable bet with favorable risk-reward dynamics. However, Fisher’s quality-growth standard (7) and Livermore’s trend-following rule (40) paint a starkly different picture, dismissing it as lacking the durability or momentum needed for their strategies. Even Graham’s traditional valuation (67) and the efficient-market skeptics (43) remain split, with one seeing mixed potential and the other questioning whether active selection adds value over passive indexing.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 91
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 82
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 75
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 67
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 66
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 65
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 40
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
31.5%
Operating Margin
4.7%
Net Margin
2.6%
EBITDA Margin
10.5%
ROE
2.0%
ROA
1.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.18
Cash
$4.38M
Total Debt
$112.33M
Current Ratio
3.71
Debt/Equity
0.26
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.49
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$10.09
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-283.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-27.60M | $-25.32M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-26.74M | $-22.50M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-26.40M | $-20.39M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-26.57M | $-18.82M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-27.23M | $-17.70M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-29.05M
Terminal Value
$-429.40M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-279.08M
Enterprise Value
$-383.80M
Net Debt
$107.95M
Equity Value
$-491.75M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8.71
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.13
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 9 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 15.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
StockStory · 13.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 7.8.2026
MarketBeat · 6.8.2026
StockStory · 6.8.2026
ChartMill · 6.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
AerSale Corporation (ASLE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 38/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ASLE currently scores 38/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ASLE's estimated fair value is -$10.09, which is 283.7% below the current price of $5.49. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ASLE's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 63.6%; Net income growth: 46.6%; Debt/equity: 0.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$10.09 vs. price $5.49 (-283.7%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.41 (3y annualized return -29.3% / max drawdown 72.0%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ASLE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tschirhart Benjamin Thomas | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 882 | -882 | $5.44 |
| Pizzi Enrique | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 15,164 | +15,164 | — |
| Garmendia Martin | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 29,246 | +29,246 | — |
| Finazzo Nicolas | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 545,156 | +545,156 | — |
| Tschirhart Benjamin Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 31,800 | +31,800 | — |
| Hechenberger Paul Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 29,246 | +29,246 | — |
| Hechenberger Paul Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 61,330 | +61,330 | — |
| Tschirhart Benjamin Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 15,164 | +15,164 | — |
| Wright Frederick Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 36,343 | +36,343 | — |
| Pizzi Enrique | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 31,800 | +31,800 | — |
| Finazzo Nicolas | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 259,965 | +259,965 | — |
| Jones Gary Edmund | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 68,144 | +68,144 | — |
| Jones Gary Edmund | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 32,495 | +32,495 | — |
| Wright Frederick Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 17,331 | +17,331 | — |
| Garmendia Martin | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 61,330 | +61,330 | — |
| Tschirhart Benjamin Thomas | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 77 | -77 | $6.56 |
| Tschirhart Benjamin Thomas | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 32,487 | -77 | $6.56 |
| Garmendia Martin | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 6,094 | -6,094 | $6.34 |
| Hechenberger Paul Andrew | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 1,586 | -1,586 | $6.34 |
| Tschirhart Benjamin Thomas | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 1,886 | -1,886 | $6.34 |
| Jones Gary Edmund | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 7,491 | -7,491 | $6.34 |
| Wright Frederick Craig | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 4,182 | -4,182 | $6.34 |
| Pizzi Enrique | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 3,122 | -3,122 | $6.34 |
| Wright Frederick Craig | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 213,531 | -4,182 | $6.34 |
| Hechenberger Paul Andrew | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 14,581 | -1,586 | $6.34 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,517,196 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,897,302 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology