Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$19.66
▼ $0.16 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$19.61 - $19.86
52-Week Range
$9.18 - $19.90
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$10.77
Resistance
$19.90
+15.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 51.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -147.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
47
Risk
56
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
38
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Accelerant Holdings focuses on its strong financial performance and acquisition news. The company reported strong second-quarter earnings and was spotlighted for
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Accelerant Holdings Class A Common. News trend score: 74. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
43
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
38
Technical
47
Valuation
50
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+51%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ARX’s psychology is dominated by **overconfidence** (100), where price momentum (+1.7%) starkly contradicts deteriorating fundamentals (-54.5% EPS growth). This suggests traders are ignoring deteriorating earnings, a classic anchoring bias (98) near resistance. The **euphoria** (60) and **FOMO** (32) signals further imply detached optimism, while the **narrative gap** (16) hints at a disconnect between market hype and reality. The key question: *Will traders eventually confront the fundamental divergence, or will momentum sustain overconfidence?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:02 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Accelerant Holdings shares surged 43% after strong Q2 earnings and a Thoma Bravo take-private deal at $20.25 per share"
"Accelerant Holdings shares surged 43% after strong Q2 earnings"
"After Golden Cross, Accelerant Holdings (ARX)'s technical outlook is bright"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-universal caution (like Veblen’s 8 or Nelson’s 11) to outright enthusiasm (Bagehot’s 100, though limited by data). Patient, long-term thinkers like Housel (80) and Smith (72) see steady compounding potential, while defensive investors like Loeb (66) and Graham (43) are more reserved, with the latter outright dismissing it for lacking defensive traits. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Livermore (59) and Fisher (57) are lukewarm, while market skeptics—from Mackay (27) to Marks (27) and Bogle (38)—warn of overvaluation or late-cycle risks. The contrast highlights a core tension: growth-oriented strategies see promise, but cyclical and valuation-focused models flag warning signs, suggesting the stock’s appeal depends entirely on the investor’s framework.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 94
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 76
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 66
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 37
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 8
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (4 bullish · 7 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-147.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-192.8%
ROA
-16.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$7.49
Cash
$1.72B
Total Debt
$121.30M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.17
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$3.67
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.06
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 10 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
MarketBeat · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 16.8.2026
Fintel · 14.8.2026
Fintel · 14.8.2026
Business Wire · 14.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Accelerant Holdings Class A Common (ARX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARX currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ARX's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 51.5%; ATR: 1.3% of price; Debt/equity: 0.17.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -147.4% (negative); Calmar: -0.33 (3y annualized return -22.8% / max drawdown 68.9%); Return on equity (ROE): -192.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ARX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 23 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meriwether Karen Sue | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 20,868 | -542 | $19.62 |
| Meriwether Karen Sue | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 542 | -542 | $19.62 |
| Hasley Nancy | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,341,834 | -20,489 | $19.56 |
| Hasley Nancy | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 20,489 | -20,489 | $19.56 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 6,369,290 | -89,219 | $12.41 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 89,219 | -89,219 | $12.41 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 6,458,509 | -63,616 | $12.07 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 27,591,939 | -80,000 | $12.09 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 63,616 | -63,616 | $12.07 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 80,000 | -80,000 | $12.09 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 80,000 | -80,000 | $12.06 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 27,671,939 | -80,000 | $12.06 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 6,522,125 | -104,647 | $14.56 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 104,647 | -104,647 | $14.56 |
| Sternberg Matthew David | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 596,482 | -17,568 | $14.64 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 6,626,772 | -110,467 | $14.63 |
| Sternberg Matthew David | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 17,568 | -17,568 | $14.64 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 15,223 | -15,223 | $14.45 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 80,000 | -80,000 | $14.63 |
| ONeill Francis James | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 110,467 | -110,467 | $14.63 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 27,767,162 | -80,000 | $14.63 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 27,751,939 | -15,223 | $14.45 |
| Sternberg Matthew David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.7.2026 | 614,050 | -3,910 | $13.77 |
| Sternberg Matthew David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.7.2026 | 3,910 | -3,910 | $13.77 |
| RADKE JEFFREY L | Open Market Sale | 20.7.2026 | 80,000 | -80,000 | $13.51 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,177,939 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,013,471 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
20.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 26.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology