Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$34.86
▼ $0.73 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 06:04 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$10.72B
Day Range
$34.81 - $35.67
52-Week Range
$29.10 - $45.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$32.58
Resistance
$40.21
+9.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 22.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.55
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
23
Risk
40
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
54
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Antero Resources Corporation highlights its valuation as a potential bargain, emphasizing strong long-term stock performance—up **147.4% over five years**—while noting its current undervaluation relative to earnings. Analysts, including Goldman Sachs, maintain a **Buy rating** with an upgraded price target to **$48**, citing robust cash generation from its upstream and midstream operations. The focus remains on whether the stock offers further upside despite market fluctuations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Antero Resources Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
54
Technical
23
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+5
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 1.1% gap below resistance, treating it as a near-term threshold rather than a potential breakout. While FOMO and euphoria signals exist—evidenced by momentum, overbought RSI, and extreme sentiment—the lack of panic or herding implies a cautious, disciplined approach. The narrative gap (28 points) hints at a disconnect where optimism exceeds tangible reality, possibly reinforcing anchoring. The key question: *Will traders treat resistance as a ceiling or a near-term pivot?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Antero Resources has returned 147.4% over the past 5 years"
"current valuation checks still suggest the stock screens on the cheap side"
"Goldman Sachs raises price target to $48; Raymond James raises to $55"
"Seven energy stocks rallied as crude topped $90 on US strikes in Iran"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-oriented methodologies. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score suggests it’s a high-growth candidate where the price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, aligning with his 'buy the company, not the stock' philosophy. Meanwhile, investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith, Philip Fisher, and Morgan Housel—who prioritize fundamentals, quality, and patient holding—also see strong merit, though Fisher’s slightly lower score hints at reservations about exceptional quality. In contrast, value-driven and cycle-sensitive frameworks like Benjamin Graham’s, Howard Marks’ market-cycle approach, and Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s overbought assessment paint a far more cautious picture, flagging risks like stretched valuations or late-cycle positioning. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in speculative upside or whether its growth is already priced in, with even moderate-risk frameworks like Gerald Loeb and Walter Bagehot warning of liquidity or structural concerns.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 71
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 68
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 59
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 32
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 21
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 19
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
70.9%
Operating Margin
16.6%
Net Margin
12.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.4%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.05
Cash
$210.00M
Total Debt
$1.40B
Current Ratio
0.55
Debt/Equity
0.19
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$24.48
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$22.72
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Antero Resources Corporation (AR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AR currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AR's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 22.0%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1027.8%; Net income growth: 619.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.55; Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 10.4% / max drawdown 33.2%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Munoz Jeffrey S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
| Tyree Thomas B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
| Sutil Vicky | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
| Keenan W Howard JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
| Mutschler Jacqueline C | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
| Schroer Brenda R | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
| Hardesty Benjamin A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 2,181 | +2,181 | — |
| Tyree Thomas B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 104,458 | +1,617 | — |
| Keenan W Howard JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 372,938 | +1,617 | — |
| Munoz Jeffrey S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 10,604 | +1,617 | — |
| Sutil Vicky | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 104,458 | +1,617 | — |
| Mutschler Jacqueline C | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 69,991 | +1,617 | — |
| Schroer Brenda R | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 38,661 | +1,617 | — |
| Hardesty Benjamin A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 154,336 | +2,181 | — |
| Kennedy Michael N. | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 15,086 | -15,086 | $39.61 |
| Kennedy Michael N. | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 170,740 | -170,740 | $39.31 |
| Schultz Yvette K | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 549 | -549 | $39.76 |
| Schultz Yvette K | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 38,941 | -38,941 | $39.26 |
| Kennedy Michael N. | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 1,100,278 | -170,740 | $39.31 |
| Kennedy Michael N. | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 1,085,192 | -15,086 | $39.61 |
| Schultz Yvette K | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 278,214 | -38,941 | $39.26 |
| Schultz Yvette K | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 277,665 | -549 | $39.76 |
| Schroer Brenda R | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 1,418 | +1,418 | — |
| Tyree Thomas B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 1,418 | +1,418 | — |
| Mutschler Jacqueline C | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 1,418 | +1,418 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,175,546 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 13,194,214 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology