Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$28.12
▲ $1.74 (+6.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:03 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$8.20B
Day Range
$26.15 - $28.30
52-Week Range
$19.01 - $50.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
14.10.2026
Support
$22.93
Resistance
$33.04
APLD is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
+41.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 167.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -38.7% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $28.12
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 35 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
65
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
32
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage has centered on Applied Digital’s stock movement and valuation. After a 44% year‑to‑date rally, the shares slipped about 3% on September 10, despite no new company news. Analysts such as Jim Cramer highlighted Applied Digital as a profitable tech name worth watching, while comparison pieces noted its high valuation relative to peers like Super Micro despite ongoing losses. The company is also mentioned in broader AI‑infrastructure discussions and memory‑price outlooks.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Applied Digital Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
44
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
32
Technical
65
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-40%
Market Narrative
79
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+36
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
APLD’s dominant **Loss Aversion** reflects deep-rooted reluctance to accept further losses after a 27.3% drop over three months, despite a recent rebound. The narrative-reality gap (9 points) suggests investors may be clinging to outdated optimism, while technicals (RSI 53, negative ROC) hint at cautious buying. The key question: *Will the recent volume spike sustain, or will profit-taking resume?* FOMO and euphoria remain muted due to weak momentum and underperformance vs. peers.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"About $36 billion of 15-year contracted rent is on the books -- but almost none of it arrives until billions more in construction gets finished."
"Two of the market’s most aggressive AI infrastructure stories fell together on September 1 as the 10-year Treasury yield climbed to 4.79%. Applied Digital Corporation dropped about 4%."
"APLD's heavy capital needs, rising debt, delayed revenue ramp and dilution risks weigh on shares despite a $36B contracted AI pipeline."
"It still trades at 12.4 times sales against 3.2 for the S&P 500. Both are true at once, because the price has little to do with the business you can see today."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Bagehot’s documented principles, the model estimates the stock’s strong liquidity would let it survive a credit squeeze, while Lynch’s growth focus and Mackay’s crowd‑mania filter both see upside, leading Marks (cycle) to view it as early‑to‑mid cycle and not overextended. Fisher, Smith, Schwager, Marks (general) and Nelson, using criteria for exceptional quality, reasonable long‑term holds, clear edges and mid‑cycle signals, assign moderate scores that suggest the company is solid but not standout. Graham’s defensive and enterprising screens, as well as Loeb’s risk‑to‑capital metric, flag the price as insufficiently cheap and only moderately risky, producing lower marks. Finally, the efficient‑market view of Malkiel/Bogle, Livermore’s trend rule, Veblen’s critique of growth for its own sake, and Housel’s volatility concern all produce very low scores, indicating a weak case from those perspectives.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 60
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 21
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
35.1%
Operating Margin
-38.7%
Net Margin
-30.2%
EBITDA Margin
-27.7%
ROE
-10.7%
ROA
-1.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.91
Cash
$1.59B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.01
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$6.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.04
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 3 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
APLD currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
APLD's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 167.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 21.6%; Net income growth: 20.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -38.7% (negative); Net margin: -30.2% (negative); ATR: 6.7% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for APLD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nottenburg Richard N | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | $31.15 |
| Mohmand Mohammad Saidal LaVanway | Other Transaction | 4.8.2026 | 13,408 | +13,408 | — |
| Cummins Wes | Other Transaction | 4.8.2026 | 714,685 | -714,685 | — |
| Cummins Wes | Other Transaction | 4.8.2026 | 12,798 | -714,685 | — |
| Mohmand Mohammad Saidal LaVanway | Other Transaction | 4.8.2026 | 888,431 | +13,408 | — |
| Nottenburg Richard N | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 133,378 | -75,000 | $31.15 |
| Cummins Wes | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 1,600,000 | +1,600,000 | — |
| Zhang Jason Gechen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 236,100 | -236,100 | $27.39 |
| Laltrello Laura | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 260,640 | -260,640 | $27.39 |
| Mohmand Mohammad Saidal LaVanway | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 96,408 | -96,408 | $27.39 |
| Cummins Wes | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 629,600 | -629,600 | $27.39 |
| Laltrello Laura | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 600,000 | +600,000 | — |
| Mohmand Mohammad Saidal LaVanway | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 245,000 | +245,000 | — |
| Zhang Jason Gechen | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 600,000 | +600,000 | — |
| Cummins Wes | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 6,387,600 | +1,600,000 | — |
| Cummins Wes | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 5,758,000 | -629,600 | $27.39 |
| Mohmand Mohammad Saidal LaVanway | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 971,431 | +245,000 | — |
| Mohmand Mohammad Saidal LaVanway | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 875,023 | -96,408 | $27.39 |
| Zhang Jason Gechen | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,824,515 | +600,000 | — |
| Zhang Jason Gechen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 2,588,415 | -236,100 | $27.39 |
| Laltrello Laura | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 1,073,796 | +600,000 | — |
| Laltrello Laura | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 813,156 | -260,640 | $27.39 |
| Laltrello Laura | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.7.2026 | 43,440 | -43,440 | $33.50 |
| Laltrello Laura | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.7.2026 | 473,796 | -43,440 | $33.50 |
| Zhang Jason Gechen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 147,563 | -147,563 | $35.52 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
58,427,815 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 72,715,542 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology