Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$68.48
▼ $1.11 (-1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/22 01:36 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$2.33B
Day Range
$68.31 - $69.67
52-Week Range
$37.69 - $82.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$63.37
Resistance
$81.49
ANDE is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+77.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$36.89 vs. price $68.48 (-153.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
44
Risk
42
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
41
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **The Andersons, Inc.** (ANDE) has highlighted its strong second-quarter 2026 financial performance, driven primarily by surging earnings in its renewables and fertilizer sectors. The company reported record net income of $57 million ($1.65 per share) and adjusted net income of $74 million ($2.15 per share), marking significant year-over-year growth. Analysts, including BMO Capital, have raised price targets and maintained an "Outperform" rating, citing robust profitability and favorable valuation. Additionally, the company declared a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of 2026.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about The Andersons, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
41
Technical
44
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+21
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ANDE suggests a dominant **confirmation bias**, where investors prioritize a positive narrative (narrative score 68) over stagnant fundamentals (reality score 38). The 30-point gap fuels selective attention to bullish signals, while modest momentum and elevated sentiment align with FOMO and euphoria. Overconfidence emerges as price outpaces revenue growth, but no clear panic or anchoring disrupts the narrative-driven focus. The key question: Will traders remain anchored to the narrative despite zero revenue growth, or will reality scores converge with narrative expectations?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"net income attributable to the company climbing to $57 million [...] from just $7.9 million [...] a year earlier"
"Q2 Earnings Beat Puts Fair Value Back In Focus"
"raises the price target from $75 to $90"
"The Andersons, Inc. Declares Cash Dividend for Fourth Quarter 2026"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between cautious skepticism and guarded optimism, reflecting deep philosophical divides in investing. Charles Mackay’s near-moderate score suggests he’d see early signs of speculative fervor, while the rest of the crowd—from Graham’s strict valuation tests to Fisher’s quality demands—either dismisses the stock outright or finds it lacking in key fundamentals. The middle-ground thinkers like Schwager and the Efficient Market proponents acknowledge neither a clear bull nor bear case, but even their scores hover below 60, signaling hesitation. Meanwhile, the most bearish voices—Veblen, Nelson, and Housel—warn of overvaluation, volatility, or cyclical exhaustion, framing the stock as either a speculative bubble or a poor fit for patient, risk-averse investors. The contrast underscores whether ANDE is a speculative play (Mackay) or fundamentally flawed (Fisher, Veblen), with most methodologies landing in the ‘not worth the risk’ camp.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 54
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 34
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 30
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
6.5%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
0.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.7%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$98.28M
Total Debt
$623.39M
Current Ratio
1.41
Debt/Equity
0.50
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.200 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.200 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.200 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.195 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.195 |
| 1.7.2025 | $0.195 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.195 |
| 1.4.2025 | $0.195 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.195 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$68.48
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$36.89
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-153.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-53.32M | $-48.92M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-51.65M | $-43.47M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-51.01M | $-39.39M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-51.33M | $-36.36M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-52.61M | $-34.19M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-56.13M
Terminal Value
$-829.60M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-539.18M
Enterprise Value
$-741.51M
Net Debt
$525.11M
Equity Value
$-1.27B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$36.25
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$30.68
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Exec Edge · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
PR Newswire · 20.8.2026
Motley Fool · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
MarketBeat · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
Moby · 4.8.2026
MT Newswires · 3.8.2026
Associated Press · 3.8.2026
ChartMill · 3.8.2026
PR Newswire · 3.8.2026
The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ANDE currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ANDE's estimated fair value is -$36.89, which is 153.9% below the current price of $68.48. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ANDE's technical score is 44/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; CMF 20 days: 0.06.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$36.89 vs. price $68.48 (-153.9%); Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 10.1% / max drawdown 47.8%); Revenue growth (last year): -2.2%.
Yes — ANDE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zibbel Sarah | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.9.2026 | 602 | -602 | $64.87 |
| Zibbel Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 1,944 | -1,944 | — |
| Zibbel Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 1,944 | +1,944 | — |
| Zibbel Sarah | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 69.675 | +69.675 | — |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 514 | +37 | — |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 37 | +37 | — |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 283 | +283 | — |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 477 | +283 | — |
| Douglas Gary A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 8.282 | +8.282 | — |
| Hershberger Pamela S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 8.282 | +8.282 | — |
| Hershberger Pamela S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 8.774 | +8.774 | — |
| Hershberger Pamela S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 6.068 | +6.068 | — |
| Bowe Patrick E. | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 3,534 | -3,534 | $80.53 |
| Douglas Gary A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 6.068 | +6.068 | — |
| Bowe Patrick E. | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 74,875 | -3,534 | $80.53 |
| Hershberger Pamela S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 3,232 | +8 | — |
| Hershberger Pamela S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 3,424 | +9 | — |
| Hershberger Pamela S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 2,368 | +6 | — |
| Douglas Gary A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 3,232 | +8 | — |
| Douglas Gary A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 2,368 | +6 | — |
| Douglas Gary A. | Other Transaction | 21.7.2026 | 31.976 | +31.976 | $77.82 |
| Douglas Gary A. | Other Transaction | 21.7.2026 | 12,474 | +32 | $77.82 |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.6.2026 | 194 | +194 | — |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.6.2026 | 194 | +194 | — |
| Heppner David R | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 1,651 | +1,651 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,323,597 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 923,643 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology