Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$174.22
▼ $10.51 (-5.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:33 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.21B
Day Range
$172.52 - $179.09
52-Week Range
$133.64 - $253.82
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$133.64
Resistance
$242.50
+6.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -2.9% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
American Resources Corporation (AMR) presents a complex profile, with its overall investor score of 56 and a 'MODERATE' rating reflecting a mix of technical strength and severe fundamental weaknesses. The technical category scores highly (83) due to positive momentum indicators—price above both 50-day and 200-day averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 69.6—suggesting short-term bullish sentiment. However, the fundamental category (34) is severely undermined by consistently negative margins (operating and net at -2.9%, ROE at -4.0%) and weak ROA (-2.7%), signaling deep operational inefficiencies or distress. Growth is equally dire (32), with catastrophic declines in revenue (-28.0%), EPS (-133.3%), and net income (-132.9%) over the last year, indicating a contractionary phase. Valuation (50) is skewed by a negative P/E (-47.5) and a high NAV per share ($115.41), which may reflect either a speculative premium or a distressed asset. News sentiment (74) is cautiously positive, driven by insider buying activity, particularly by Director Courtis, who has repeatedly purchased shares worth millions, potentially signaling confidence in the company’s turnaround or undervaluation. Quality (63) is partially mitigated by zero debt and stable operating margins, though these positives are overshadowed by the broader financial health issues. Risk (46) is elevated due to extreme volatility (77.5% max drawdown) and a low Calmar ratio (0.02), alongside the high ATR (5.0% of price), highlighting significant price instability and speculative risk.
The stock exhibits strong short-term momentum, with the price above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 69.6 indicating healthy upward momentum. The %K at 77.8 suggests neutral range positioning but aligns with positive sentiment.
Strong technicals often attract speculative buying, but they must align with fundamental stability to avoid a short-term rally followed by a correction.
All key profitability metrics are negative: operating margin (-2.9%), net margin (-2.9%), and ROE (-4.0%), while ROA is also weak at -2.7%. The current ratio (4.47) is strong, but this is the only positive indicator in an otherwise bleak financial picture.
Negative margins and ROE indicate the company is not generating value from its operations, raising concerns about sustainability and long-term viability.
The company has experienced catastrophic declines in revenue (-28.0%), EPS (-133.3%), and net income (-132.9%) over the last year, reflecting a severe contraction in business performance.
Such drastic declines are a red flag for investors, signaling either a structural issue, market contraction, or unsustainable business model.
The negative P/E ratio (-47.5) and high NAV per share ($115.41) suggest the stock is either priced for speculative potential or reflects a distressed asset with no earnings to justify valuation.
A negative P/E is unusual and typically indicates either a speculative play or a company with no near-term earnings potential, making traditional valuation metrics unreliable.
Recent news is dominated by insider buying activity, with Director Courtis repeatedly purchasing shares worth millions, alongside neutral filings from other insiders. This suggests some confidence in the company’s trajectory.
Insider buying can signal confidence in the company’s future, but it may also reflect a belief in a turnaround or undervaluation rather than current operational strength.
The company maintains zero debt and stable operating margins, which are positive indicators of financial discipline and operational stability. However, these are offset by the broader negative profitability metrics.
Zero debt is a strong quality indicator, but it is insufficient to compensate for the company’s overall financial distress and lack of profitability.
The stock exhibits extreme volatility, with a 77.5% max drawdown over three years and a low Calmar ratio (0.02), alongside an ATR of 5.0% of price. The current ratio (4.47) is strong, but the overall risk profile is elevated.
Such volatility and drawdowns indicate high speculative risk, and the lack of profitability or growth makes the company vulnerable to further downturns.
StockIQ conclusion
American Resources Corporation (AMR) exhibits a mixed but predominantly negative profile, with strong technicals and insider buying activity contrasting sharply with severe fundamental weaknesses. The company’s negative margins, catastrophic revenue declines, and extreme volatility highlight significant risks, while its zero debt and liquidity provide some stability. The speculative nature of the stock, driven by insider confidence and short-term momentum, may attract traders seeking high-risk, high-reward opportunities. However, without a clear path to profitability or growth, the company’s long-term prospects remain uncertain. Investors should approach AMR with caution, focusing on potential catalysts for a turnaround rather than relying on traditional valuation or growth metrics.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
9
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
31
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. has primarily focused on its coal-focused operations amid investor caution. Key themes include **insider buying activity**, with Director Courtis repeatedly purchasing millions in shares—totaling over $10 million in August alone—amid a **49% stock surge in the past year**, signaling confidence despite the company’s **$46.1 million net loss** and a $2.7 billion market cap. Analysts have debated whether this insider activity warrants broader investor interest or signals potential risks.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 18 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
31
Technical
9
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **split between FOMO and Euphoria**, both scoring 50, as positive momentum (+15.2% ROC) and extreme sentiment (86/100) drive buying despite weak fundamentals. Overconfidence (41) and confirmation bias (46) indicate traders may be ignoring deteriorating revenue (-0.3%) and stagnant margins, reinforcing narrative-driven optimism. The key question: *Will traders sustain euphoria despite widening narrative-reality gaps?* The absence of panic (5) or herding (0) suggests no immediate collective shift, but overconfidence could persist until momentum stalls or fundamentals deteriorate further.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Courtis now holds over 1 million shares directly as stock surges 49% over past year"
"Alpha Metallurgical Resources Insider Bought Shares Worth $1,144,927, According to a Recent SEC Filing"
"following a 52% one-year stock return"
"B. Riley Adjusts Price Target on Alpha Metallurgical Resources to $185 From $189, Maintains Neutral Rating"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for AMR reflects deep philosophical divides in investing. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on liquidity and resilience during crises, suggesting the stock’s stability in a credit squeeze—an approach rooted in financial robustness. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising investor frameworks both rate it positively, emphasizing its value and margin of safety, though the latter is less enthusiastic due to limited discount depth. In contrast, growth-oriented methodologies like Philip Fisher and Peter Lynch dismiss it outright, as their models prioritize high-quality, high-growth companies with clear competitive advantages—qualities AMR’s profile fails to meet. Even cyclical or market-timing strategies, such as Howard Marks’ late-cycle caution or Samuel Nelson’s overbought warning, flag concerns about timing or valuation, while efficiency-market skeptics like Malkiel and Bogle question whether the stock’s edge justifies active selection over passive indexing. The divide underscores whether AMR is a defensive value play (Graham, Bagehot) or a speculative or cyclical bet (Livermore, Marks) that may not align with disciplined growth or fundamental quality screens.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 91
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 65
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 65
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 261 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
9.6%
Operating Margin
-2.9%
Net Margin
-2.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-4.0%
ROA
-2.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$4.75
Cash
$365.97M
Total Debt
$3.86M
Current Ratio
4.47
Debt/Equity
0.01
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.11.2023 | $0.500 |
| 14.9.2023 | $0.500 |
| 14.6.2023 | $0.500 |
| 14.3.2023 | $0.440 |
| 14.12.2022 | $5.418 |
| 14.9.2022 | $0.392 |
| 14.6.2022 | $0.375 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$120.69
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$118.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 18 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Motley Fool · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Motley Fool · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Motley Fool · 25.8.2026
Motley Fool · 22.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMR currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AMR's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.01; Current ratio: 4.47.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -2.9% (negative); Net margin: -2.9% (negative); ATR: 6.5% of price.
Yes — AMR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 25 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 305 | +305 | $227.88 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 2,891 | +2,891 | $226.92 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 1,847 | +1,847 | $223.85 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 99 | +99 | $229.39 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 2,749 | +2,749 | $226.13 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 2,109 | +2,109 | $225.21 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,025,394 | +50 | $235.47 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,025,344 | +210 | $234.24 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,024,620 | +690 | $231.12 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,023,729 | +1,201 | $228.61 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,023,930 | +201 | $229.83 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,021,665 | +1,271 | $226.48 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,025,134 | +514 | $232.83 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,022,528 | +863 | $227.35 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 690 | +690 | $231.12 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 863 | +863 | $227.35 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 50 | +50 | $235.47 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,271 | +1,271 | $226.48 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 210 | +210 | $234.24 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 514 | +514 | $232.83 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 201 | +201 | $229.83 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,201 | +1,201 | $228.61 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 1,018,308 | +2,914 | $216.22 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 1,020,394 | +2,086 | $216.97 |
| Courtis Kenneth S. | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 2,086 | +2,086 | $216.97 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,320,196 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,676,578 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 72.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology