Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$50.30
▲ $2.35 (+4.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$12.47B
Day Range
$48.23 - $50.42
52-Week Range
$28.03 - $96.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$42.66
Resistance
$72.40
+72.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.33
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $10.73 vs. price $50.30 (-78.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
39
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Amkor Technology, Inc.** has primarily focused on its stock performance and investor interest, particularly as a potential value opportunity. The company was highlighted alongside other undervalued stocks with strong earnings growth expectations and attractive valuation metrics, including low EV-to-EBITDA ratios. Additionally, Amkor’s upcoming presentation at the **Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference** in September 2026 suggests ongoing investor engagement and market positioning in the semiconductor packaging and test sector. No substantive operational or financial details beyond stock analysis were prominently featured.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Amkor Technology, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
50
Technical
39
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-44%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+51
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (63) reflects a reluctance to crystallize losses amid a 26.5% drop over three months, despite muted volume. Overconfidence (45) and Euphoria (35) persist due to extreme valuation (+373% DCF), suggesting investors cling to upside potential despite weak momentum. The **narrative gap** (33) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations (70) and deteriorating fundamentals (37). The key question: Will traders exit to lock in gains or hold for a rebound, or will the gap widen as reality diverges further?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"PARR, AMKR, KSS, AVT and ECVT stand out with attractive EV-to-EBITDA ratios and strong earnings outlook"
"Zacks.com featured highlights include Par Pacific, Amkor Technology, Kohl's, Avnet and Ecovyst"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing strong potential while others flag significant risks. The highest-scoring approaches—Samuel Armstrong Nelson (88), Walter Bagehot (83), and Howard Marks’ cycle analysis (78)—highlight favorable technical positioning, liquidity strength, and an early-to-mid market cycle, suggesting a bullish outlook. Conversely, the lowest-rated frameworks—Philip Fisher (14), Jesse Livermore (17), and Peter Lynch (22)—reject the stock outright, citing lack of Fisher’s signature quality, a negative trend for Livermore, and failing Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price test. Meanwhile, mid-tier methodologies like Edgar Lawrence Smith (66) and Charles Mackay (65) offer mixed but cautiously optimistic views, while efficient-market proponents (41) and Graham’s strict criteria (29) dismiss it as overvalued or unsustainable. The divide reflects a tension between cyclical/liquidity optimism and fundamental skepticism about valuation or growth durability.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 83
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 66
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 41
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 33
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 29
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 27
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 14
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
14.0%
Operating Margin
6.9%
Net Margin
5.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.4%
ROA
4.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.51
Cash
$1.38B
Total Debt
$1.45B
Current Ratio
2.27
Debt/Equity
0.33
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.9.2026 | $0.084 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.084 |
| 2.6.2026 | $0.084 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.084 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.084 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.084 |
| 2.12.2025 | $0.084 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.083 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.083 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.083 |
| 4.6.2025 | $0.083 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.083 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$50.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$10.73
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-78.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.7% | $187.83M | $172.32M |
| 2 | -0.6% | $186.67M | $157.11M |
| 3 | 0.4% | $187.45M | $144.75M |
| 4 | 1.5% | $190.19M | $134.74M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $194.95M | $126.70M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$190.99M
Terminal Value
$3.07B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.00B
Enterprise Value
$2.73B
Net Debt
$66.90M
Equity Value
$2.67B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$18.08
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.29
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Stocktwits · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMKR currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMKR's estimated fair value is $10.73, which is 78.7% below the current price of $50.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMKR's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.33; Current ratio: 2.27; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $10.73 vs. price $50.30 (-78.7%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 6.0% of price.
Yes — AMKR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faust Megan | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $49.05 |
| ROGERS MARK N | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| ROGERS MARK N | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $59.78 |
| ROGERS MARK N | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $7.40 |
| Faust Megan | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $54.45 |
| ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $8.51 |
| ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $55.81 |
| Rutten Guillaume Marie Jean | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $54.50 |
| Rutten Guillaume Marie Jean | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $55.35 |
| CHURCHILL WINSTON J | Gift | 30.7.2026 | 100 | -100 | — |
| Engel Kevin K. | Open Market Sale | 30.7.2026 | 3,221 | -3,221 | $47.00 |
| Engel Kevin K. | Open Market Sale | 30.7.2026 | 9,666 | -3,221 | $47.00 |
| CHURCHILL WINSTON J | Gift | 30.7.2026 | 28,681 | -100 | — |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 250,000 | +250,000 | $9.48 |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 250,000 | -250,000 | — |
| KIM AGNES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 250,000 | +250,000 | $9.48 |
| KIM AGNES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | $9.86 |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 200,000 | -200,000 | — |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | $9.86 |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 261,645 | +200,000 | $9.86 |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 511,645 | +250,000 | $9.48 |
| KIM JAMES J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 0 | -250,000 | — |
| KIM AGNES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 10,937,355 | +200,000 | $9.86 |
| KIM AGNES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 11,187,355 | +250,000 | $9.48 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,385,236 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,926,978 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology