Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$6.08
▼ $0.05 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:31 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$198.61M
Day Range
$5.93 - $6.18
52-Week Range
$4.16 - $8.69
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$5.63
Resistance
$8.01
ALTG is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-17.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$2.23 vs. price $6.08 (-136.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
34
Risk
40
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
44
Institutional
87
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Alta Equipment Group Inc. has centered primarily on its **Q2 2026 earnings performance**, highlighting **margin recovery and operational improvements** amid a favorable market backdrop. Analysts and investors examined key financial metrics, growth trends, and management commentary during the earnings call, with discussions focusing on profitability, demand drivers, and second-half outlook. The company’s financial health and investor sentiment were the dominant themes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alta Equipment Group Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 4 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
44
Technical
34
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-21%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+12
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ALTG is down 2.6% today, tracking closely with its peer group’s 2.3% decline, indicating herding is the dominant driver. Moderate panic‑selling indicators and flat momentum suggest underlying uncertainty. The key question is whether sentiment will shift and cause the stock to diverge from peer performance.
Updated: 09/10/2026, 12:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Improving backdrop drives margin recovery and optimism for second half"
"Alta (NYSE:ALTG) Misses Q2 CY2026 Sales Expectations"
"The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Alta’s Q2 Earnings Call"
"Alta Equipment Group Announces Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that investors like Charles Mackay and Samuel Armstrong Nelson give ALTGL high scores because they focus on crowd behavior and cycle positioning, seeing no obvious mania and a favorable, less‑overbought market stage. In contrast, more valuation‑oriented investors such as Benjamin Graham, Howard Marks and the efficient‑market perspective assign lower scores, highlighting mixed fundamentals, moderate risk, or weak evidence that the stock can beat an index. Mid‑range scores from Howard Marks (cycle), Jack Schwager and Gerald M. Loeb suggest a cautious but not outright negative view, reflecting their emphasis on risk‑adjusted returns and capital preservation. Growth‑focused thinkers like Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher and speculative traders such as Jesse Livermore give low scores, pointing to insufficient growth quality or a negative trend. Overall, the divergence stems from each methodology weighing different factors—sentiment, cycle timing, intrinsic value, risk, and momentum—leading to a split assessment of the stock.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 64
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 63
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 39
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 32
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.9%
Operating Margin
1.3%
Net Margin
-4.4%
EBITDA Margin
8.5%
ROE
912.5%
ROA
-6.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.55
Cash
$18.60M
Total Debt
$495.50M
Current Ratio
1.43
Debt/Equity
-56.31
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.5.2025 | $0.057 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.057 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.057 |
| 13.2.2025 | $0.057 |
| 15.11.2024 | $0.057 |
| 14.11.2024 | $0.057 |
| 15.8.2024 | $0.057 |
| 14.8.2024 | $0.057 |
| 14.5.2024 | $0.057 |
| 13.5.2024 | $0.057 |
| 14.2.2024 | $0.057 |
| 13.2.2024 | $0.057 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$6.08
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$2.23
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-136.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.7% | $25.17M | $23.09M |
| 2 | 4.9% | $26.41M | $22.23M |
| 3 | 4.1% | $27.50M | $21.23M |
| 4 | 3.3% | $28.41M | $20.12M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $29.12M | $18.92M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$23.80M
Terminal Value
$459.14M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$298.41M
Enterprise Value
$404.00M
Net Debt
$476.90M
Equity Value
$-72.90M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$0.27
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$4.11
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 10 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 17 articles.
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
MarketBeat · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Business Wire · 19.8.2026
StockStory · 15.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Moby · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Associated Press · 7.8.2026
StockStory · 6.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALTG currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ALTG's estimated fair value is -$2.23, which is 136.7% below the current price of $6.08. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ALTG's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 912.5% — strong; Debt/equity: -56.31.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$2.23 vs. price $6.08 (-136.7%); Net margin: -4.4% (negative); ATR: 5.9% of price.
Yes — ALTG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 13 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Katherine E | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 14,903 | +14,903 | — |
| Shribman Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 14,903 | +14,903 | — |
| WILSON COLIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 14,903 | +14,903 | — |
| STUDDERT ANDREW P | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 14,903 | +14,903 | — |
| Nair Sidhartha | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 14,903 | +14,903 | — |
| STUDDERT ANDREW P | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 131,716 | +14,903 | — |
| WILSON COLIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 43,937 | +14,903 | — |
| White Katherine E | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 82,204 | +14,903 | — |
| Nair Sidhartha | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 52,709 | +14,903 | — |
| Shribman Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 361,796 | +14,903 | — |
| Mill Road Capital III, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 3,798 | +3,798 | $5.95 |
| LYNCH THOMAS E | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 4,373,208 | +3,798 | $5.95 |
| Mill Road Capital III, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 12.3.2026 | 58,162 | +58,162 | $6.10 |
| LYNCH THOMAS E | Open Market Purchase | 12.3.2026 | 4,369,410 | +58,162 | $6.10 |
| Mill Road Capital III, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2026 | 18,040 | +18,040 | $6.36 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $6.37 |
| LYNCH THOMAS E | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2026 | 4,311,248 | +18,040 | $6.36 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2026 | 37,806 | +1,000 | $6.37 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 9.3.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $6.75 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 9.3.2026 | 36,806 | +1,000 | $6.75 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 5.3.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $7.00 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 5.3.2026 | 35,806 | +1,000 | $7.00 |
| Nair Sidhartha | Open Market Purchase | 3.3.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $7.13 |
| Greenawalt Ryan | Open Market Sale | 3.3.2026 | 27,986 | -27,986 | $7.05 |
| Colucci Anthony | Open Market Sale | 3.3.2026 | 8,137 | -8,137 | $7.05 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
597,636 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 527,577 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology