Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$118.52
▲ $1.42 (+1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/21 02:00 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$9.79B
Day Range
$117.85 - $119.07
52-Week Range
$76.01 - $137.62
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$111.86
Resistance
$134.66
ALSN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+31.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -6.7%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
14
Fundamental
75
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of Allison Transmission has highlighted its modest stock performance, with shares up 0.1% since the latest earnings report and lagging the broader market despite a 7.1
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 14. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
35
Fundamentals
75
Technical
23
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
24
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
-16
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests **herding** dominates, as ALSN’s outperformance today (+2.2%) relative to peers (+1.3%) aligns with crowd-driven alignment. Overconfidence (27) and anchoring (48) are secondary, reflecting a disconnect between momentum (+5.1% ROC) and fundamentals (negative EPS growth). The narrative gap (-5) hints at a slight misalignment between market perception and reality, but no panic or euphoria extremes are evident. The key question: Will herding sustain if momentum stalls or resistance holds?
Updated: 09/06/2026, 03:24 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Allison Transmission (ALSN) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"heavy transportation equipment stocks, starting with Allison Transmission (NYSE:ALSN)."
"David Graziosi, Chair at Allison Transmission (NYSE:ALSN) executed a significant exercise of company stock options... Allison Transmission Holdings Insider Sold Shares Worth $3,551,470"
"Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week August 23"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for ALSN split sharply between cautious optimism and outright skepticism, reflecting deep philosophical divides in investing. Charles Mackay and Walter Bagehot’s relatively high scores suggest a stock that avoids crowd-driven frenzy and maintains adequate liquidity, aligning with their focus on avoiding speculative bubbles and ensuring operational robustness. In contrast, the majority—including Graham, Lynch, and Nelson—reject the stock outright, with Graham’s low score highlighting its failure to meet defensive valuation thresholds, while Lynch and Nelson flag overvaluation or lack of growth potential. Meanwhile, Fisher’s and Veblen’s middling verdicts hint at a business that may lack the transformative quality Fisher sought or the clear profit translation Veblen demanded, bridging the gap between outright dismissal and cautious interest.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 93
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 69
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 16
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
48.6%
Operating Margin
29.2%
Net Margin
20.7%
EBITDA Margin
29.2%
ROE
33.4%
ROA
10.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.42
Cash
$1.50B
Total Debt
$2.89B
Current Ratio
4.85
Debt/Equity
1.55
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.290 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.290 |
| 17.5.2026 | $0.290 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.290 |
| 8.3.2026 | $0.290 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.270 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.270 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.270 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.270 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.270 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.270 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.270 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$118.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$107.82
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-9.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1% | $681.27M | $625.02M |
| 2 | 2.9% | $701.20M | $590.18M |
| 3 | 2.8% | $720.71M | $556.52M |
| 4 | 2.6% | $739.75M | $524.06M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $758.25M | $492.81M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$661.00M
Terminal Value
$11.96B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.77B
Enterprise Value
$10.56B
Net Debt
$1.40B
Equity Value
$9.16B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$21.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$11.79
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 8 neutral, 9 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 12.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
PR Newswire · 11.8.2026
Motley Fool · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALSN currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ALSN's estimated fair value is $107.82, which is 9.0% below the current price of $118.52. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ALSN's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 33.4% — strong; Current ratio: 4.85.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -6.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -11.8%; Net income growth: -14.8%.
Yes — ALSN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altmaier Judy L | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 50 | +50 | — |
| Ostojic Sasha | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| Christman Philip J | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| EVERITT DAVID C | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 64 | +64 | — |
| Graziosi David S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 131 | +131 | — |
| Shivram Krishna | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| Perna Gustave | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| Price Michael Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 38 | +38 | — |
| Mell Scott A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 28 | +28 | — |
| HAZNEDAR CAROLANN I | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 52 | +52 | — |
| Scroggins Eric C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 11 | +11 | — |
| BARBOUR D. SCOTT | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| Bohley G Frederick | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 35 | +35 | — |
| Graziosi David S. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 309,401 | -9,050 | $133.21 |
| Graziosi David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 331,551 | +26,708 | $38.11 |
| Graziosi David S. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 304,843 | -4,558 | $134.05 |
| Graziosi David S. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 318,451 | -13,100 | $132.44 |
| Graziosi David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 17,593 | -26,708 | — |
| Graziosi David S. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 4,558 | -4,558 | $134.05 |
| Graziosi David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 26,708 | -26,708 | — |
| Graziosi David S. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 9,050 | -9,050 | $133.21 |
| Graziosi David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 26,708 | +26,708 | $38.11 |
| Graziosi David S. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 13,100 | -13,100 | $132.44 |
| Scroggins Eric C. | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 16,604 | -1,050 | $125.00 |
| Scroggins Eric C. | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 1,050 | -1,050 | $125.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,772,809 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,628,341 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology