Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$40.00
▼ $0.60 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:55 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$12.17B
Day Range
$39.85 - $40.49
52-Week Range
$35.92 - $47.29
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.10.2026
Support
$39.84
Resistance
$46.81
-10.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 31.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.37 (3y annualized return 12.1% / max drawdown 33.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
12
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ally Financial Inc. has centered on operational challenges and investor scrutiny, particularly after a **widespread digital outage** in early September that raised concerns about its reliability and undervaluation narrative. Analysts and investors are reassessing the company’s valuation, while its stock performance—down **3.5% since its last earnings report**—has drawn attention. Additionally, Ally’s participation in the **Barclays Global Financial Services Conference** and its positioning in the consumer finance sector amid peer comparisons were noted. The company’s broader market perception remains tied to stability and growth amid shifting investor dynamics.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ally Financial Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
92
Fundamentals
48
Technical
12
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ALLY suggests a **herding-driven momentum** phase, where traders align with peer performance rather than fundamentals. The narrative gap (+28) and overconfidence in price momentum over EPS growth indicate selective confirmation bias, while FOMO remains muted by moderate volume and RSI. The key open question is whether this peer-driven rally will sustain or if fundamentals (stagnant revenue) will eventually test the narrative. Low volatility and extreme positive sentiment currently dampen panic or loss aversion, reinforcing herd behavior.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:37 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ally’s widespread digital outage puts its undervalued narrative to the test"
"Ally completed a share repurchase tranche reducing share count while reporting higher net interest income and net income"
"Truist Securities lowers Ally Financial price target from $54 to $51 while maintaining a Buy rating"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Samuel Armstrong Nelson's documented principles, the model estimates the stock sits near an oversold cycle position, and Charles Mackay’s view similarly finds no crowd mania. Based on Jack Schwager and Peter Lynch’s documented criteria, the model estimates a disciplined, growth‑oriented setup where price has yet to catch up. Based on Benjamin Graham, Howard Marks, and Thorstein Veblen’s documented standards, the model estimates mixed signals about intrinsic value, valuation depth, and whether growth translates to profit. Finally, based on the criteria of Gerald Loeb, the efficient‑market advocates, Edgar Smith, and Philip Fisher, the model estimates heightened risk, insufficient stability, and a lack of the quality signature those investors require.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 75
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 74
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 59
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 55
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 30
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 12
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
10.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
5.5%
ROA
0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.39
Cash
$10.03B
Total Debt
$17.07B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.10
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.7.2026 | $0.300 |
| 30.7.2026 | $0.300 |
| 1.5.2026 | $0.300 |
| 30.4.2026 | $0.300 |
| 2.2.2026 | $0.300 |
| 1.2.2026 | $0.300 |
| 31.10.2025 | $0.300 |
| 30.10.2025 | $0.300 |
| 1.8.2025 | $0.300 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.300 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.300 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$49.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$48.90
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 11 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALLY currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ALLY's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 31.7%; Net income growth: 27.5%; NAV per share: $48.90.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.37 (3y annualized return 12.1% / max drawdown 33.1%); Revenue growth (last year): -3.3%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — ALLY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Stephanie N | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 88,927 | -5,000 | $44.23 |
| Richard Stephanie N | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $44.23 |
| Hutchinson Russell E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.7.2026 | 241,253 | -12,614 | $44.43 |
| Hutchinson Russell E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.7.2026 | 12,614 | -12,614 | $44.43 |
| Bright Gunther | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.7.2026 | 6,466 | +300 | $45.95 |
| GIBBONS THOMAS P | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.7.2026 | 26,062 | +1,034 | $45.95 |
| Reilly David | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.7.2026 | 36,770 | +708 | $45.95 |
| Bright Gunther | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.7.2026 | 300 | +300 | $45.95 |
| GIBBONS THOMAS P | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.7.2026 | 1,034 | +1,034 | $45.95 |
| Reilly David | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.7.2026 | 708 | +708 | $45.95 |
| GIBBONS THOMAS P | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 25,028 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| SHARPLES BRIAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 44,741 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| CARY WILLIAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 61,285 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| Fennebresque Kim S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 68,002 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| HOBBS FRANKLIN W IV | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 150,939 | +6,133 | $41.99 |
| Weber Tracey Drake | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 3,632 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| Clark Mayree C | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 100,318 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| Bright Gunther | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 6,166 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| Hutchinson Russell E. | Other Transaction | 15.5.2026 | 0 | -6 | $1,000.00 |
| Reilly David | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 36,062 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| GOLDBERG MICHELLE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,898 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| MERRILL ALLAN P | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 5,658 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| Richard Stephanie N | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 93,927 | -5,000 | $42.14 |
| Weber Tracey Drake | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 3,632 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
| GIBBONS THOMAS P | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 3,632 | +3,632 | $41.99 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,895,942 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 13,172,041 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology