Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$19.28
▼ $0.03 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:46 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.65B
Day Range
$19.20 - $19.42
52-Week Range
$18.61 - $23.03
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$19.19
Resistance
$23.03
-5.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.23 (3y annualized return 7.6% / max drawdown 32.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
43
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
10
Risk
42
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
46
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Acadia Realty Trust highlights its financial performance and market perception. Analyst upgrades from KeyBanc, including a price target of $25, have driven a stock rally, while Q2 earnings showed rising adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) despite lower revenue. The company’s steady dividend—recently affirmed at $0.20 per share—remains a focus, with some analysts suggesting the stock may trade below fair value. Additionally, a $75 million loan secured for a Queens shopping center renovation underscores ongoing development activity.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Acadia Realty Trust. News trend score: 74. Reason: 5 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
91
Fundamentals
46
Technical
10
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior—evidenced by the stock’s near-support position (1.0% distance)—suggests traders are fixated on a recent reference point, likely the recent low. Loss aversion (11) and mild panic selling (20) further imply caution, while FOMO remains minimal due to weak momentum (-4.2% ROC) and neutral RSI (34). The key question is whether the stock can break free from this anchor or if traders will hold near support, given the narrow narrative-reality gap (4 points).
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:28 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"KeyBanc Upgrades Acadia Realty Trust to Overweight From Sector Weight, Sets $25 Price Target"
"Acadia Realty Trust Announces $0.20 Per Share Quarterly Dividend"
"Acadia Realty Trust Q2 AFFO Rises, Revenue Falls; Lifts 2026 Guidance"
"Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) Stock Could Be Trading Below Fair Value"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some models seeing strong potential while others flag significant risks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both rate it near-perfectly, emphasizing favorable cycle positioning and the absence of crowd-driven mania—suggesting a contrarian or momentum-friendly opportunity. Meanwhile, growth-focused investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) also see upside, viewing it as a long-term or early-cycle play. However, more conservative voices like Benjamin Graham and Jesse Livermore dismiss it outright, with Graham calling it unsafe and Livermore warning against its trend direction. The middle ground—represented by Fisher, Housel, and Loeb—acknowledges moderate merit but lacks the exceptional quality or effortless holdability they typically seek. The contrast highlights a tension between cyclical/momentum-driven strategies and fundamental or defensive approaches, where the same stock is either a high-conviction bet or a red flag depending on the framework.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 51
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 50
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 42
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 39
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 33
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 264 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
12.0%
Net Margin
4.1%
EBITDA Margin
50.4%
ROE
0.8%
ROA
0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.10
Cash
$38.82M
Total Debt
$1.86B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.84
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.200 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.190 |
| 30.9.2024 | $0.190 |
| 28.6.2024 | $0.180 |
| 27.3.2024 | $0.180 |
| 28.12.2023 | $0.180 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.180 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$17.30
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 13 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.9.2026
CRE Daily · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
The Fly · 18.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 10.8.2026
Business Wire · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 29.7.2026
MT Newswires · 28.7.2026
Associated Press · 28.7.2026
Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AKR currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AKR's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Revenue growth (last year): 14.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.23 (3y annualized return 7.6% / max drawdown 32.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -47.4%; Net income growth: -22.0%.
Yes — AKR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thurber Lynn C | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 111,573 | +5,592 | $21.46 |
| Woodhouse Hope B | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 15,533 | +5,592 | $21.46 |
| Thurber Lynn C | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 105,981 | +5,178 | $21.46 |
| Denien Mark A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 51,760 | +5,436 | — |
| Spitz William T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 113,248 | +5,592 | $21.46 |
| Denien Mark A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 57,352 | +5,592 | — |
| Zoba David C | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 84,291 | +5,592 | — |
| McIntyre Kenneth A Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 34,793 | +5,592 | — |
| Wielansky Lee S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 74,024 | +6,990 | — |
| Spitz William T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,592 | +5,592 | $21.46 |
| McIntyre Kenneth A Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,592 | +5,592 | — |
| Thurber Lynn C | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,178 | +5,178 | $21.46 |
| Denien Mark A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,592 | +5,592 | — |
| Denien Mark A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,436 | +5,436 | — |
| Woodhouse Hope B | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,592 | +5,592 | $21.46 |
| Thurber Lynn C | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,592 | +5,592 | $21.46 |
| Wielansky Lee S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 6,990 | +6,990 | — |
| Zoba David C | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,592 | +5,592 | — |
| Livingston Reginald | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 9,426 | -25,000 | $22.12 |
| Livingston Reginald | Conversion of Derivative Security | 6.5.2026 | 117,863 | -25,000 | — |
| Livingston Reginald | Conversion of Derivative Security | 6.5.2026 | 34,726 | +25,000 | — |
| Livingston Reginald | Conversion of Derivative Security | 6.5.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | — |
| Livingston Reginald | Conversion of Derivative Security | 6.5.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | — |
| Livingston Reginald | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $22.12 |
| Blacksberg Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.2.2026 | 390,806 | +53,921 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,965,464 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 16,896,731 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology