Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$70.35
▼ $0.73 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 06:06 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$69.96 - $71.14
52-Week Range
$69.96 - $92.40
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$69.96
Resistance
$86.94
-15.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 27.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.19 (3y annualized return 5.0% / max drawdown 26.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
55
Value
60
Momentum
6
Risk
54
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
64
Institutional
14
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Assured Guaranty Ltd.** has primarily focused on its financial performance and investor sentiment. Analysts highlighted its strong **Q2 earnings**, noting record results, while some reports questioned its stock valuation amid broader market skepticism. The company’s **dividend status** was also emphasized, with updates on its dividend payments and ratings. Additionally, **credit rating affirmations** (e.g., from AM Best) underscored its financial stability, though broader industry comparisons occasionally flagged concerns about its stock performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Assured Guaranty Ltd.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
64
Technical
6
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-8%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the near-term support level (0.9% above), likely due to its proximity. The narrative gap (9 points) hints at a disconnect between perceived and actual fundamentals, but the lack of panic or euphoria signals disciplined positioning. Key uncertainty remains: whether the stock’s proximity to support will trigger defensive anchoring or breakout attempts. Low FOMO (score 3) and neutral sentiment (62/100) imply limited urgency, while herding and overconfidence are absent, reinforcing a cautious, anchor-dependent mindset.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:59 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Keefe, Bruyette & Woods analyst lowers Assured Guaranty price target to $97"
"3 Insurance Stocks We’re Skeptical Of"
"stocks featured in this article tumbled to its lowest point in 12 months"
"Assured Guaranty’s record-setting quarter"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into three distinct camps: the overwhelmingly bullish, the cautiously optimistic, and the outright skeptical. The top-tier investors—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Smith—all score it a perfect 100, framing it as a rare, high-quality opportunity that aligns with their core principles of value, growth, or long-term compounding. Even Nelson and Mackay, with scores in the high 90s, see it as a favorable cycle position or free from speculative mania, reinforcing the idea of a well-timed, low-risk buy. Meanwhile, the middle tier—including Schwager, Marks (both versions), and the efficient-market theorists—still view it as a disciplined, statistically justified play, though with slightly more caution about risk or market efficiency. The divergence emerges with Loeb, who flags moderate risk, and Veblen, who questions whether growth will translate to profits, hinting at a more nuanced or skeptical interpretation. Finally, Livermore’s low score and outright negative verdict stand out as an outlier, dismissing the stock entirely due to a lack of clear trend direction, illustrating how even high-quality signals can clash with a trader’s preference for decisive market momentum.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 98
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 97
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 88
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 76
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 73
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
57.2%
Net Margin
55.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.9%
ROA
4.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.39
Cash
$419.00M
Total Debt
$1.70B
Current Ratio
4.44
Debt/Equity
0.30
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.380 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.380 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.380 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.380 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.380 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.340 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.340 |
| 5.3.2025 | $0.340 |
| 4.3.2025 | $0.340 |
| 22.11.2024 | $0.310 |
| 21.11.2024 | $0.310 |
| 21.8.2024 | $0.310 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$125.33
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$101.52
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Business Wire · 19.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 15.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Business Wire · 12.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 7.8.2026
Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGO currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AGO's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 27.3%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 49.3%; Net income growth: 33.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.19 (3y annualized return 5.0% / max drawdown 26.3%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — AGO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FREDERICO DOMINIC | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 23,331 | -23,331 | — |
| ASSURED GUARANTY LTD | Open Market Purchase | 22.7.2026 | 209,387.822 | +209,387.822 | $24.83 |
| Rosenblum Benjamin G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 1,156 | -1,156 | $81.39 |
| Rosenblum Benjamin G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 61,448 | -1,156 | $81.39 |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 18.6.2026 | 2,588 | -2,588 | — |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 18.6.2026 | 153,111 | -2,588 | — |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 17.6.2026 | 24,159 | -24,159 | — |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 17.6.2026 | 155,699 | -24,159 | — |
| Radtke Lorin | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 1,047 | -1,047 | $74.32 |
| Radtke Lorin | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 9,307 | -1,047 | $74.32 |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 28.5.2026 | 74 | -74 | — |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 28.5.2026 | 179,858 | -74 | — |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 21.5.2026 | 427 | -427 | — |
| BORGES FRANCISCO L | Gift | 21.5.2026 | 179,932 | -427 | — |
| Bailenson Robert | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 32,353 | -32,353 | $78.82 |
| Bailenson Robert | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 17,647 | -17,647 | $78.24 |
| Bailenson Robert | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 288,604 | -17,647 | $78.24 |
| Bailenson Robert | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 256,251 | -32,353 | $78.82 |
| Kreczko Alan J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 3,936 | +3,936 | — |
| Rosenblum Benjamin G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 637 | -637 | $80.86 |
| Chow Ling | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 5,970 | +5,970 | — |
| Horn Holly | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 2,755 | +2,755 | — |
| FREDERICO DOMINIC | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 33,980 | +33,980 | — |
| Donnarumma Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 3,490 | +3,490 | — |
| Bailenson Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 7,806 | +7,806 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,260,343 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,899,223 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology