Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$4.17
▼ $0.18 (-4.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$384.92M
Day Range
$4.16 - $4.32
52-Week Range
$2.81 - $4.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$3.84
Resistance
$4.56
ACCO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-0.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 141.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $4.42
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 12 to 38 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
41
Risk
48
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
47
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **ACCO Brands Corporation** has primarily centered on its **agreement to acquire Trust**, a gaming accessories firm specializing in computer and gaming peripherals for Europe and Latin America. The deal, expected to enhance ACCO’s portfolio with brands like Kensington and PowerA, aims to generate cost synergies of approximately **$5 million to $8 million within 18 months**. The acquisition reflects ACCO’s strategic shift toward expanding its tech peripherals offerings. No other significant company-specific developments were highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Acco Brands Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
26
Fundamentals
47
Technical
41
Valuation
55
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ACCO suggests a **narrative-driven confirmation bias** as the dominant psychological state, with traders selectively validating optimistic narratives despite weak revenue growth. FOMO and early euphoria coexist due to strong momentum and sentiment, but the narrative gap (30) indicates traders may be overemphasizing positive signals while ignoring fundamental stagnation. Overconfidence is muted but present, as price momentum outpaces EPS growth. The key open question is whether traders will continue validating the narrative or reassess fundamentals as the gap widens. Low volatility and absence of panic selling suggest complacency, not urgency.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ACCO Brands to Acquire Gaming Accessories Firm Trust; ... extends ACCO Brands’ Kensington, PowerA and EPOS technology peripherals portfolio"
"ACCO expects to realize cost synergies of ~$5M to $8M within 18 months after closing"
"SN Stock Up 8% After Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, 2026 Outlook Raised"
"Is Acco Brands (ACCO) Stock Outpacing Its Consumer Discretionary Peers This Year?"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark divide among methodologies, with Benjamin Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* approach standing out as the lone enthusiastic voice—scoring 83 and labeling it a ‘real candidate’ due to its statistical discount. Meanwhile, Graham’s more conservative framework (68) and Peter Lynch’s growth-focused lens (67) both flag it as ‘mixed,’ suggesting potential but not enough margin of safety or undervaluation. The split highlights a core tension: Graham’s disciplined valuation contrasts sharply with the near-universal caution from risk-averse or cycle-sensitive investors like Loeb (39), Marks (35), and Schwager (27), who see it as overpriced, volatile, or late-stage. Even Lynch’s ‘mixed’ verdict implies the market has already priced in its growth, leaving little room for the aggressive bets favored by Graham’s more speculative arm. The extreme lows from Fisher (9), Nelson (6), and Housel (21) further underscore how few methodologies find it compelling, framing it as either a speculative gamble or a speculative bubble—depending on the investor’s framework.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 85
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 68
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 67
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 22
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 19
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 9
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
32.8%
Operating Margin
6.1%
Net Margin
2.7%
EBITDA Margin
6.1%
ROE
6.2%
ROA
1.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.45
Cash
$64.40M
Total Debt
$836.80M
Current Ratio
1.61
Debt/Equity
1.26
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.075 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.075 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.075 |
| 20.3.2026 | $0.075 |
| 19.3.2026 | $0.075 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.075 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.075 |
| 22.8.2025 | $0.075 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.075 |
| 23.5.2025 | $0.075 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.075 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.075 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$7.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$5.43
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 12 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.8.2026
Business Wire · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
MarketBeat · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
Moby · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
Zacks · 30.7.2026
Associated Press · 30.7.2026
ChartMill · 30.7.2026
Business Wire · 30.7.2026
Yahoo · 30.7.2026
Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ACCO currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ACCO's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 141.5%; Net income growth: 140.6%; Current ratio: 1.61.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.18 (3y annualized return -10.1% / max drawdown 56.9%); Revenue growth (last year): -8.5%.
Yes — ACCO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simermeyer Elizabeth A | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 1,940.2 | +1,940.2 | — |
| Jotwani Pradeep | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 4,961.4 | +4,961.4 | — |
| Lombardi Ronald M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 3,292 | +3,292 | — |
| Keller Robert J | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 4,514.3 | +4,514.3 | — |
| RAJKOWSKI E MARK | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 5,127.2 | +5,127.2 | — |
| DVORAK KATHLEEN S | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 5,464 | +5,464 | — |
| BURTON JOSEPH B | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 2,538.9 | +2,538.9 | — |
| Monteagudo Graciela | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 4,149.8 | +4,149.8 | — |
| Monteagudo Graciela | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 4,487.3 | +4,487.3 | — |
| RAJKOWSKI E MARK | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 5,544.3 | +5,544.3 | — |
| Lombardi Ronald M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 3,559.8 | +3,559.8 | — |
| Jotwani Pradeep | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 5,365 | +5,365 | — |
| DVORAK KATHLEEN S | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 5,908.5 | +5,908.5 | — |
| BURTON JOSEPH B | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 2,745.5 | +2,745.5 | — |
| Keller Robert J | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 4,881.5 | +4,881.5 | — |
| Simermeyer Elizabeth A | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 2,098 | +2,098 | — |
| Keller Robert J | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 260,022 | +4,882 | — |
| DVORAK KATHLEEN S | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 314,723 | +5,909 | — |
| RAJKOWSKI E MARK | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 295,324 | +5,544 | — |
| Jotwani Pradeep | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 285,775 | +5,365 | — |
| Lombardi Ronald M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 189,621 | +3,560 | — |
| BURTON JOSEPH B | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 146,241 | +2,746 | — |
| Monteagudo Graciela | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 239,025 | +4,487 | — |
| Jones Angela Y | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 57,217 | -57,217 | $4.02 |
| Jones Angela Y | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 18,580 | -57,217 | $4.02 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,312,665 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,176,805 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology