Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$38.10
▼ $2.01 (-5.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$37.90 - $39.88
52-Week Range
$29.44 - $69.07
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$37.88
Resistance
$69.07
+2.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/23 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 21.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.8% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
57
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
10
Risk
42
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Clear Secure, Inc. (NYSE: YOU) has recently seen media focus on its strong financial performance and strategic partnerships. The company reported robust second-quarter results, with rising revenue, margins, and cash flow, though growth projections suggest a slight slowdown. Insider selling activity—including a vice president’s sale of over 9,000 shares—highlighted investor sentiment amid a 24% one-year stock return. Notably, Clear Secure partnered with CrowdStrike to integrate its identity verification platform (CLEAR1) into CrowdStrike’s Falcon security system, enhancing threat detection through human identity assurance. Analysts also praised Clear Secure’s pricing power and retention strength.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Clear Secure, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
88
Fundamentals
65
Technical
10
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-26%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior—evidenced by the stock’s proximity to support—suggests traders are fixating on a near-term price level, potentially suppressing volatility. The narrative gap (25 points) hints at a disconnect where extreme sentiment (100/100) doesn’t fully align with the stock’s underperformance relative to its 200-day average. Loss aversion (48) and muted panic (10) indicate cautious holding despite recent declines, while overconfidence (4) hints at selective optimism. The key question remains whether the anchoring level holds or if traders will eventually reassess the stock’s valuation beyond this threshold.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Clear Secure (YOU) reported second-quarter results that hit almost every mark investors watch: revenue, bookings, margins, and cash flow all moved in the right direction."
"CrowdStrike and CLEAR announced a strategic partnership integrating CLEAR’s secure identity platform with CrowdStrike’s Falcon platform."
"A Clear Secure Vice President sold over 9,000 company shares after a 24% one-year return."
"Clear Secure stock has delivered strong gains, yet the market may still be pricing it below fundamentals."
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Nelson's cycle‑position score of 100 and Smith's 87, the model estimates the stock sits in an oversold part of the market and looks like a long‑term hold. Marks‑cycle (79), Mackay (76) and Lynch (71) also see a favorable position, emphasizing early‑mid cycle timing and growth not yet reflected in price. Fisher (65), Schwager (53), Marks (50) and Housel (45) are more muted, reflecting concerns about overall quality, edge and possibly high expectations. The lowest scores from Veblen (36), the efficient‑market view (35), Livermore (24), Loeb (21), Graham‑enterprising (21), Bagehot (16) and Graham (0) highlight worries about speculative growth, limited data, liquidity and capital risk, leading those methodologies to advise caution or avoidance.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 87
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 71
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 21
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 16
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
20.7%
Net Margin
12.1%
EBITDA Margin
24.5%
ROE
61.4%
ROA
8.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$85.73M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.01
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.9.2026 | $0.150 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 9.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.350 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.350 |
| 10.12.2025 | $0.125 |
| 9.12.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.9.2025 | $0.125 |
| 9.9.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.125 |
| 9.6.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.395 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Motley Fool · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 5.9.2026
Motley Fool · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
PR Newswire · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Clear Secure, Inc. (YOU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
YOU currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
YOU's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 21.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 61.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.8% of price; Net income growth: -35.7%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — YOU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLaughlin Kyle | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 4,499 | -4,499 | $44.47 |
| Liu Dennis W. | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 2,104 | -2,104 | $44.47 |
| Barkin Michael Z | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 11,444 | -11,444 | $45.00 |
| Liu Dennis W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 10,969 | -10,969 | — |
| Liu Dennis W. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 3,955 | -3,955 | $42.97 |
| McLaughlin Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 4,693 | -4,693 | $42.97 |
| Liu Dennis W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 10,969 | +10,969 | — |
| McLaughlin Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 9,192 | -9,192 | — |
| McLaughlin Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 9,192 | +9,192 | — |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Disposition to the Company | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | -323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | +323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Disposition to the Company | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | -323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | -323,904 | — |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | +323,904 | — |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | -323,904 | — |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Disposition to the Company | 6.8.2026 | 17,806,342 | -323,904 | — |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 17,806,342 | -323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Disposition to the Company | 6.8.2026 | 17,806,342 | -323,904 | — |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 323,904 | +323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 151,787 | +323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 17,806,342 | -323,904 | — |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 6,006 | -6,006 | $67.67 |
| Alclear Investments, LLC | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 71,487 | -71,487 | $61.11 |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $68.45 |
| Seidman Becker Caryn | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 6,006 | -6,006 | $67.67 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,749,580 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,864,997 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology