Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$76.28
▼ $0.19 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:12 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$75.88 - $76.90
52-Week Range
$48.21 - $86.92
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$75.73
Resistance
$86.92
XYZ is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-1.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 56.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.29 (3y annualized return 15.3% / max drawdown 53.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
9d ago · $79.40
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 4 to -23 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
33
Risk
48
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING XYZ...
Recent media coverage of Block, Inc. has centered on its **application to establish Builders Bank & Trust**, a national trust bank charter filed with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), signaling its expansion into traditional banking. The company’s push into financial services—highlighting growth in its Cash App’s banking activities and merchant gross payment volume—has been a key focus, alongside broader market comparisons and Cathie Wood’s unrelated investment shifts away from Block’s competitors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Block, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 7 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
86
Fundamentals
57
Technical
33
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for XYZ suggests a dominant **herding** dynamic, where relative underperformance (-3.2% vs. peers) may signal lagging momentum rather than extreme bias. The narrative gap (6 points) hints at a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but no clear panic or euphoria dominates. Overconfidence is mild, as price trades above DCF despite lagging EPS growth. The key open question: *Is this underperformance structural or temporary?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Block Applies for National Trust Bank Charter From OCC"
"Cash App segment is becoming a major driver of the growth story for Block Inc."
"Block is delivering accelerating top line growth and substantial margin expansion post-restructuring"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for XYZ reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests the stock lacks crowd-driven mania, aligning with his focus on avoiding speculative bubbles, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Walter Bagehot see it as a cyclically favorable or liquidity-backed opportunity—prioritizing resilience and timing. Conversely, Fisher, Graham, and Lynch dismiss it outright, either for lacking growth quality, statistical cheapness, or reasonable valuation, emphasizing fundamentals and long-term stability. Meanwhile, Livermore and Schwager’s low scores stem from opposing the prevailing trend or finding no clear technical setup, highlighting their contrarian and disciplined approaches. The middle-ground methodologies—Marks, Housel, and Loeb—cautiously acknowledge moderate risk or holdability, balancing cyclical positioning with risk tolerance, while the lowest scorers like Veblen and the Efficient Market camp either see it as speculative or unworthy of active selection.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 89
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 73
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 31
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 22
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 21
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$75.73
Range Bottom
$86.92
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
42.8%
Operating Margin
7.1%
Net Margin
5.4%
EBITDA Margin
8.6%
ROE
5.9%
ROA
3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.13
Cash
$6.56B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.20
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$76.28
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$75.51
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-1.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
11.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.8% | $2.71B | $2.49B |
| 2 | 9.5% | $2.97B | $2.50B |
| 3 | 7.1% | $3.18B | $2.45B |
| 4 | 4.8% | $3.33B | $2.36B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $3.42B | $2.22B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.42B
Terminal Value
$53.86B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$35.01B
Enterprise Value
$47.03B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$47.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$35.65
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 5 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Forkast News · 12.9.2026
Block, Inc. (XYZ) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
XYZ currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, XYZ's estimated fair value is $75.51, which is 1.0% below the current price of $76.28. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
XYZ's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 56.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 2.20.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.29 (3y annualized return 15.3% / max drawdown 53.0%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -53.9%; Net income growth: -54.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for XYZ.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $78.39 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $79.27 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $82.18 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $82.51 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $83.57 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $77.30 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $80.04 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $82.58 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $85.12 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $84.00 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,470,672 | -6,000 | $84.00 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $82.00 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 1,476,672 | -6,000 | $82.00 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $81.81 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 1,482,672 | -6,000 | $81.81 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $81.48 |
| Ahuja Amrita | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 4,636 | -4,636 | $81.91 |
| Ahuja Amrita | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 4,875 | -4,875 | $82.92 |
| Grassadonia Brian | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 4,343 | -4,343 | $82.90 |
| Jennings Owen Britton | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 1,317 | -1,317 | $81.48 |
| Grassadonia Brian | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 3,830 | -3,830 | $81.88 |
| Eisen Anthony Mathew | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 1,488,672 | -6,000 | $81.48 |
| Jennings Owen Britton | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 460,128 | -1,317 | $81.48 |
| Ahuja Amrita | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 423,262 | -4,875 | $82.92 |
| Grassadonia Brian | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 513,981 | -4,343 | $82.90 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,846,262 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 14,511,033 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology