Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$69.07
▼ $1.50 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$8.83B
Day Range
$68.76 - $70.07
52-Week Range
$56.33 - $124.23
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$68.48
Resistance
$80.98
WLK is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-18.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 2.24
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$76.89 vs. price $69.07 (-211.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
29
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
48
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
27
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Westlake Corporation (WLK) has centered on its stock performance and valuation amid a prolonged decline. Over the past three years, WLK shares have dropped roughly 39%, prompting investor scrutiny of whether the drop aligns with its business fundamentals or reflects overreaction. Analysts note mixed signals: recent momentum shows slight improvement (up 2.1% year-to-date), but earnings quality and operational risks—including housing market weakness and global pressures—remain concerns. The company’s growth in high-performance materials (HIP) and acquisitions are highlighted as positives, though valuation remains debated as neither clearly cheap nor expensive.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Westlake Corporation. News trend score: 44. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 6 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
34
Psychology
83
Fundamentals
27
Technical
13
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
34
Fundamental Reality
34
Narrative Gap
+0
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
WLK’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (48) reflects a market wary of further downside after a 14.2% drop, with subdued volume (0.86x avg) signaling caution. **Confirmation Bias** (14) persists due to a +11 narrative gap despite deteriorating fundamentals, suggesting selective attention to positive narratives. **Herding** (37) is present but muted, as WLK underperformed peers (-0.1% vs -1.1% avg) without extreme divergence. The key question: Will traders exit to lock in gains or hold for recovery, or will deteriorating fundamentals force a deeper reassessment? The absence of panic or euphoria suggests a stalemate between risk aversion and selective optimism.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:38 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week September 6 — Explore this week’s dividend updates for Dividend Champions, Contenders & Challengers"
"Westlake stock has delivered a steep decline over the past three years, yet its current valuation checks point to pricing that looks broadly in line with fundamentals"
"This has prompted investors to reassess whether that drop properly reflects its business profile, earnings quality, and current valuation"
"Westlake Corporation announced today the dual listing of its common stock on the NYSE Texas, the newly launched fully electronic equities exchange headquartered in Dallas, Texas"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Charles Mackay’s documented principles, the model estimates that the stock shows no crowd mania, aligning with the high scores from Samuel Nelson, Howard Marks (cycle), and both Graham approaches, which all view the current cycle position and deep discount as attractive. In contrast, methodologies that emphasize growth quality, long‑term earnings stability, or market efficiency—such as Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, Thorstein Veblen, and the efficient‑market view—assign low scores, indicating the stock fails their growth‑at‑reasonable‑price or quality criteria. Mid‑range scores from Howard Marks, Walter Bagehot, Jack Schwager, and Gerald Loeb reflect more mixed assessments, noting reasonable risk but no clear edge. Overall, the divergence stems from whether the investor prioritizes valuation and cycle timing versus growth quality and market‑wide risk considerations.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 91
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 84
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 81
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 68
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 29
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
7.3%
Operating Margin
-14.1%
Net Margin
-13.5%
EBITDA Margin
-3.6%
ROE
-17.2%
ROA
-7.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$11.70
Cash
$2.72B
Total Debt
$5.58B
Current Ratio
2.24
Debt/Equity
0.64
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | $0.533 |
| 27.5.2026 | $0.530 |
| 26.5.2026 | $0.530 |
| 3.3.2026 | $0.530 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.530 |
| 25.11.2025 | $0.530 |
| 24.11.2025 | $0.530 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.530 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.530 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.525 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.525 |
| 4.3.2025 | $0.525 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$69.07
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$76.89
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-211.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-503.50M | $-461.93M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-487.77M | $-410.54M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-481.67M | $-371.94M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-484.68M | $-343.36M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-496.80M | $-322.88M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-530.00M
Terminal Value
$-7.83B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-5.09B
Enterprise Value
$-7.00B
Net Debt
$2.86B
Equity Value
$-9.86B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$68.55
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$52.51
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 7 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
The Fly · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Westlake Corporation (WLK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 29/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WLK currently scores 29/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WLK's estimated fair value is -$76.89, which is 211.3% below the current price of $69.07. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WLK's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 2.24; Current ratio: 2.24.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$76.89 vs. price $69.07 (-211.3%); Operating margin: -14.1% (negative); Net margin: -13.5% (negative).
Yes — WLK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darby Tommy | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 1,791 | +1,791 | — |
| NORTHCUTT R BRUCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Sheets Jeffrey Wayne | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Patel Bhavesh V. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Sabat Carolyn Chao | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Lubel Kimberly S | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Chao Catherine T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Chao David Tsung-Hung | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Graff Michael J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| CREGG ROGER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 2,184 | +2,184 | — |
| Chao Albert | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 674,264 | -7,489 | $79.70 |
| Chao Albert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 681,753 | +38,873 | $61.87 |
| Chao Albert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 38,873 | -38,873 | — |
| Chao Albert | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 642,880 | -31,384 | $80.42 |
| Chao Albert | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 7,489 | -7,489 | $79.70 |
| Chao Albert | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 31,384 | -31,384 | $80.42 |
| Chao Albert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 38,873 | -38,873 | — |
| Chao Albert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 38,873 | +38,873 | $61.87 |
| Graff Michael J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.8.2026 | 23,310 | +2,168 | — |
| CREGG ROGER A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.8.2026 | 2,168 | -2,168 | — |
| Chao Catherine T. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.8.2026 | 7,748 | +2,168 | — |
| CREGG ROGER A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.8.2026 | 3,507 | +2,168 | — |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.8.2026 | 11,824 | +2,168 | — |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.8.2026 | 2,168 | -2,168 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,677,941 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,833,608 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology