Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$285.38
▼ $9.29 (-3.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:37 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.03B
Day Range
$283.36 - $292.96
52-Week Range
$283.36 - $527.37
Beta
—
Next Earnings
13.10.2026
Support
$283.36
Resistance
$401.89
WINA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-44.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $188.75 vs. price $285.38 (-33.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
58
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
6
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
67
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Winmark Corporation highlights its status as a **dividend-paying stock**, frequently mentioned alongside other "Dividend Champions" and "Contenders" for its consistent payouts. Analysts praise its **financial strength**, including high returns on invested capital (678% ROIC), strong cash flow, and low debt, though concerns persist about valuation and growth. The company reported **rising revenue but lower net income in Q2 2026**, alongside a declared quarterly dividend, while its stock performance has been stagnant since 2023 despite growing royalty income. Retail partnerships, like its collaboration with Plato’s Closet, also received brief attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Winmark Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 9 of the last 11 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
48
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
86
Fundamentals
67
Technical
6
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-29%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
WINA’s dominant anchoring (80) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.0% support level, despite a narrative-reality gap (25) where optimism (65) outpaces fundamentals (40). The extreme sentiment (100/100) and overvaluation (+65% above DCF) suggest euphoria (35) and overconfidence (45) persist, masking weak momentum (-10.2% ROC). Herding (64) may drive relative underperformance today, but the lack of panic (33) or FOMO (17) hints at cautious, anchor-bound behavior. The key question: will traders break support or hold near-term, or will sentiment collapse under further losses?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:37 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Winmark Corporation Announces Quarterly Cash Dividend"
"Winmark Corp passes the Caviar Cruise quality screen with a 678% ROIC, high margins, strong cash conversion, and low debt"
"Winmark - the Resale Company® and CCM Hockey Extend Resale Partnership for Three Additional Years"
"Winmark Fiscal Q2 Net Income Falls, Revenue Rises"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on each investor's documented principles, the model estimates that the very high scores from Nelson, Bagehot and Schwager stem from their emphasis on favorable cycle positioning, strong liquidity, and a disciplined risk‑reward setup, which paint the stock in a positive light. The mid‑range scores from Marks (cycle), Smith, Mackay, Fisher, Veblen, Loeb and Graham‑enterprising reflect a more tempered view, acknowledging decent fundamentals but noting only average quality, moderate risk, or limited margin of safety. The lower scores from Graham (defensive), Marks (risk/valuation), Malkiel & Bogle, Housel, Livermore and Lynch arise because their criteria stress deep value discounts, risk‑adjusted returns, market efficiency, volatility tolerance, and growth‑at‑reasonable‑price thresholds that this stock does not satisfy. Consequently, the debate spans a spectrum from strong endorsement to caution, driven by the differing weights each methodology places on cycle timing, liquidity, margin of safety, growth quality and volatility.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 96
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 86
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 68
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
96.4%
Operating Margin
63.4%
Net Margin
48.4%
EBITDA Margin
64.3%
ROE
-77.6%
ROA
167.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$11.73
Cash
$10.30M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.49
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.8.2026 | $1.020 |
| 13.5.2026 | $1.020 |
| 12.5.2026 | $1.020 |
| 11.2.2026 | $0.960 |
| 10.2.2026 | $0.960 |
| 12.11.2025 | $10.960 |
| 11.11.2025 | $10.960 |
| 13.8.2025 | $0.960 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.960 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.960 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.960 |
| 12.2.2025 | $0.900 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$285.38
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$188.75
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-33.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9% | $45.56M | $41.80M |
| 2 | 2.1% | $46.51M | $39.14M |
| 3 | 2.2% | $47.53M | $36.70M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $48.65M | $34.47M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $49.87M | $32.41M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$44.70M
Terminal Value
$786.41M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$511.11M
Enterprise Value
$695.64M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$695.64M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$14.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$15.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 11 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
ChartMill · 22.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 7.8.2026
Motley Fool · 20.7.2026
MT Newswires · 15.7.2026
Associated Press · 15.7.2026
Business Wire · 15.7.2026
Business Wire · 15.7.2026
PR Newswire · 14.7.2026
Business Wire · 24.6.2026
Winmark Corporation (WINA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WINA currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WINA's estimated fair value is $188.75, which is 33.9% below the current price of $285.38. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WINA's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 2.49; Gross margin: 96.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $188.75 vs. price $285.38 (-33.9%); Calmar: -0.20 (3y annualized return -8.8% / max drawdown 44.9%); Return on equity (ROE): -77.6% (negative).
Yes — WINA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 200 | -200 | $197.80 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $242.58 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 200 | +200 | $197.80 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 3,500 | +3,500 | $242.58 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 4,300 | +3,500 | $242.58 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 4,500 | +200 | $197.80 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 1,900 | -3,500 | $242.58 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 20 | -200 | $197.80 |
| Hake Lisa Schurke | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,712 | +1,712 | $378.57 |
| Hake Lisa Schurke | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 9,256 | +9,256 | $378.57 |
| HEFFES BRETT D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 4,620 | +4,620 | $378.57 |
| Credendino Keith | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| Gaudette Renae M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,984 | +1,984 | $378.57 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| Ishaug Anthony D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 2,420 | +2,420 | $378.57 |
| Hoppe Stephanie S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| SPRENGER GINA DECARO | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| Becker Amy C | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| SMITH PHILIP IRVING | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| Barbetta Lawrence A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| SMITH PHILIP IRVING | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| HEFFES BRETT D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 4,620 | +4,620 | $378.57 |
| Ishaug Anthony D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 2,420 | +2,420 | $378.57 |
| Tomlinson Percy C Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
| SPRENGER GINA DECARO | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 356 | +356 | $378.57 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
358,129 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 326,859 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology