Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$61.82
▼ $0.40 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:43 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$134.83B
Day Range
$61.54 - $61.99
52-Week Range
$54.75 - $74.98
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$59.90
Resistance
$67.45
UL is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-10.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 2/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.5% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.11 (3y annualized return 2.8% / max drawdown 26.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Unilever (UL) demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 83, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by moderate risk factors. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 88, reflecting a clear bullish trend with the stock price consistently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and a healthy RSI of 52.8. These metrics collectively signal sustained upward momentum and reduced short-term volatility risk. News sentiment also aligns positively, with recent market chatter highlighting broader sector strength (e.g., European equities ADRs) and minimal negative impact from neutral news about regulatory scrutiny involving competitors. However, the risk category scores only 50, primarily due to a relatively high ATR (1.4% of price) and a moderate drawdown risk (26.2% over three years), which suggests potential volatility and downside exposure that could impact near-term stability. The overall score reflects a balanced outlook where technical strength and positive news outweigh but do not fully offset inherent volatility risks.
The stock price is firmly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 52.8 indicating healthy upward momentum and reduced overbought conditions. The %K at 65.5 remains neutral, avoiding extreme overbought or oversold territory.
Strong technicals suggest sustained bullish momentum and lower short-term volatility risk, reinforcing investor confidence in the stock’s near-term stability.
Recent news sentiment is predominantly positive, with sector-wide gains in European ADRs and neutral coverage of regulatory scrutiny involving competitors (Pepsi/Coca-Cola) that does not directly impact UL. No overtly negative news items are present.
Positive news sentiment supports broader market confidence in consumer staples, while neutral news avoids introducing material downside risks to UL’s valuation.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility (ATR: 1.4% of price) and a historical drawdown risk of 26.2% over three years, alongside a low Sharpe ratio (0.17) indicating limited risk-adjusted returns. These factors highlight potential downside exposure.
Higher volatility and drawdown risk could introduce near-term instability, particularly in adverse market conditions, despite the stock’s current technical strength.
StockIQ conclusion
Unilever’s investor score of 83 reflects a strong technical foundation and positive news environment, but its risk profile remains moderate due to volatility and historical drawdown risks. The stock’s current positioning above key moving averages and healthy momentum indicators suggests resilience, though investors should monitor volatility trends and broader sector developments. While the data indicates a balanced outlook, inherent risks and external factors could influence future performance.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
35
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
11d ago · $63.54
Evidence: 5 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
12d ago · $64.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
12d ago · $64.20
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
13d ago · $64.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
13d ago · $64.20
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $64.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
14d ago · $64.20
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
15d ago · $64.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $64.20
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
16d ago · $64.45
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
16d ago · $64.45
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 27, 2026
Then
78
$64.96
Now
35
$61.82
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Unilever PLC’s American Depositary Shares has been limited and indirect, primarily tied to broader market trends. Most headlines focus on unrelated consumer goods companies, such as Reckitt Benckiser and PepsiCo, with no direct Unilever-specific news. The few mentions involve general European ADR market movements or unrelated legal/relabeling schemes in India. No substantive Unilever developments are highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Unilever PLC American Depositary Shares (each representing One Ordinary Share). News trend score: 56. Reason: 4 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests UL is experiencing heightened optimism, as indicated by strong FOMO and Euphoria scores driven by modest price gains, above‑average volume, a price level 7.6% above its 200‑day average, and very positive news sentiment. The low Panic Selling and zero Herding scores imply limited immediate sell pressure or crowd‑following. Evidence points to an optimism bias, while the narrative gap (13 points) indicates the prevailing story may outpace measured reality. An open question remains whether sustaining news sentiment will maintain this optimism or if peer outperformance could shift sentiment.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 07:56 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"European equities traded in the US as American depositary receipts were edging higher"
"Unilever ... Faces A Fair Value Debate, Is The Stock Fully Priced?"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some frameworks seeing it as a patient investor’s potential goldmine while others flag it as overhyped or risky. Morgan Housel’s high score and positive verdict highlight its appeal as a quiet, long-term compounder—aligning with his emphasis on steady growth and patience. Meanwhile, Charles Mackay and Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s moderate scores suggest early signs of crowd enthusiasm or cyclical oversold conditions, respectively, hinting at potential but not certainty. At the other end, the majority of value-focused investors—like Graham, Fisher, and Bagehot—struggle with insufficient data, leaving their verdicts inconclusive, while Howard Marks and the efficient-market camp warn of inflated expectations or weak evidence for outperformance. Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager’s low scores further dampen the outlook, with Livermore’s trend-following rule and Schwager’s disciplined wizards’ caution signaling a lack of clear momentum or setup.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 97
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 83
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$59.90
Range Bottom
$67.45
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.8.2026 | $0.531 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.545 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.545 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.555 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.555 |
| 7.11.2025 | $0.592 |
| 6.11.2025 | $0.592 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.589 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.589 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.586 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.586 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.526 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 13 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Just Drinks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Unilever PLC American Depositary Shares (each representing One Ordinary Share) (UL) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for UL specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
UL's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.5% of price; +3.9% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.11 (3y annualized return 2.8% / max drawdown 26.2%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — UL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,148,912 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,240,641 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology