Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$243.84
▼ $2.40 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:32 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$37.45B
Day Range
$238.50 - $249.45
52-Week Range
$98.44 - $258.35
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$179.65
Resistance
$258.35
TWLO is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+125.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 131.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.5% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (71/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 19, 2026
Then
70
$243.84
Now
70
$243.84
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
90
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
54
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Twilio Inc. has centered on its stock volatility and investor sentiment, with shares experiencing sharp price swings—including a 5.3% jump followed by a 3.12% decline—amid broader optimism around software stocks and pre-earnings anticipation. Analysts debate whether the stock is fairly valued or overpriced, given its strong 3-year return (255.8%) and mixed valuation metrics. The company’s expansion of its AI-driven customer engagement platform in Latin America also highlights its focus on AI-driven communication infrastructure.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Twilio Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
54
Technical
90
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+31%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TWLO’s market behavior suggests a **euphoric** state, driven by strong price momentum (+2.7% ROC), a 19% premium over its 200-day average, and near-perfect news sentiment (98/100). This disconnect between narrative (optimism) and fundamentals (EPS growth lagging) widens the gap (25 points), signaling potential overvaluation. The absence of panic or herd behavior implies confidence remains anchored in momentum rather than fundamentals. The key question: will traders sustain euphoria despite the growing narrative-reality divergence?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:28 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"accelerating growth... rising demand for AI communications infrastructure"
"sharp price moves... 5.3% jump followed by a 3.12% decline"
"stronger analyst optimism... expectations for higher profitability"
"stock could be 5% overvalued... expensive profile"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TWLO reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies prioritize risk, valuation, and market context. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on liquidity and resilience, suggesting the stock’s stability through volatility—something few others emphasize. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s low scores underscore his strict valuation discipline, dismissing it as too risky even for his enterprising investor framework. The middle ground—where Smith, Lynch, and Fisher land—reveals a stock with growth potential but already priced for it, leaving little margin for further upside. Marks’ cycle-based caution and Schwager’s lack of a clear technical setup further imply that while the stock may have appeal, its timing or fundamentals don’t align with the most disciplined or contrarian approaches.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 65
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 61
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 54
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 27
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
48.9%
Operating Margin
3.1%
Net Margin
0.7%
EBITDA Margin
7.0%
ROE
0.4%
ROA
0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.22
Cash
$682.34M
Total Debt
$992.29M
Current Ratio
4.03
Debt/Equity
0.13
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$48.95
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.94
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
TechCrunch · 18.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Twilio Inc. (TWLO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 70/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TWLO currently scores 70/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
TWLO's technical score is 90/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 131.8%; Net income growth: 130.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.5% of price; P/E: 1161.1; Operating margin: 3.1% — weak.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TWLO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viggiano Aidan | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 170 | -170 | $238.10 |
| Viggiano Aidan | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 304 | -304 | $234.95 |
| Viggiano Aidan | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 610 | -610 | $233.32 |
| Viggiano Aidan | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 310 | -310 | $234.30 |
| Stafman Andrew | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 500,000 | -500,000 | $247.08 |
| Stafman Andrew | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 120,000 | -500,000 | $247.08 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 487 | -487 | $249.17 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 357 | -357 | $250.83 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 628 | -628 | $252.55 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,504 | -1,504 | $251.74 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 190 | -190 | $253.56 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 334 | -334 | $254.78 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 30,906 | -487 | $249.17 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 30,549 | -357 | $250.83 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 28,227 | -190 | $253.56 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 29,045 | -1,504 | $251.74 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 27,893 | -334 | $254.78 |
| ROTTENBERG ERIKA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 28,417 | -628 | $252.55 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 4,434 | -4,434 | $211.26 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 2,300 | -2,300 | $210.08 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 2,891 | -2,891 | $212.36 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 1,060 | -1,060 | $213.25 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 2,773 | -2,773 | $206.99 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $208.48 |
| Shipchandler Khozema | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 218,888 | -2,773 | $206.99 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,491,813 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,308,336 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 72.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology