Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$12.37
▼ $0.43 (-3.4%)
Market data updated: 10/09 10:04 PM
News analyzed: 10/09/2026
Day Range
$12.32 - $12.93
52-Week Range
$7.07 - $16.34
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$11.46
Resistance
$14.60
⚖️ THE TIE-BREAKER
A summary of the data on this page — not a recommendation to buy or sell. The site's operators may hold some of the stocks.
THE BOTTOM LINE · IN ONE SECOND
Mixed
4 of 10 sources for, 3 against
If right
+9.2%
to the target
If wrong
-9.8%
to the stop
Possible loss is 1.1x the possible gain
🏛️ Legendary investors
2 of 11 would buy
🏭 Industry weight
All the data behind it — below ↓
Not enough similar moments in this stock's history for reliable percentages — so no odds are shown.
🎯 Near target
$13.50+9.2%
🛡️ Support
$11.46-7.4%
🛑 Stop
$11.15-9.8%
💎 Fair value (DCF)
—
⚖️ The jury
10 independent data sources from the site — each one votes
🏛️ Legendary investors who would buy:Samuel Armstrong Nelson · Charles Mackay
🚫 who would pass:Burton Malkiel & John Bogle · Edgar Lawrence Smith · Gerald M. Loeb · Jesse Livermore · Morgan Housel
Against
The percentages are real frequencies: how many similar past moments were up or down a month later. Every jury vote is computed from the site's own data, no AI. Not a promise and not investment advice.
+60.2% (1Y)
Computed automatically from real price data (swing highs/lows, volume flow) as of 2026-10-09. The lines are also drawn on the chart above. Not investment advice.
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.7% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 4 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 4
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
19
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Telecom Argentina SA. News trend score: 92. Reason: 7 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s model standing out as the sole strong bullish signal (100), seeing it as oversold and near a cycle bottom. Meanwhile, the majority of frameworks—including Charles Mackay (76) and Howard Marks (59)—cautiously lean toward neutral or mixed views, either dismissing crowd behavior or flagging moderate risks. The fundamentalists like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch all score dead even (50), unable to form a concrete opinion due to insufficient data, highlighting a gap in traditional valuation or growth metrics. On the bearish end, Morgan Housel (0) and Jesse Livermore (12) paint a stark picture, warning of volatility and trend resistance, while Loeb (26) and the efficient-market camp (29) outright reject the stock as either risky or a poor alternative to passive investing. The contrast underscores a stock that’s either a speculative bet for cyclical traders or a red flag for those prioritizing stability or trend alignment.
An automatic analysis based on principles these investors published — not their opinion. They are not affiliated with StockIQ and did not review or endorse this content.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 79
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 29
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 297 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 8 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.11.2024 | $0.240 |
| 19.5.2023 | $0.245 |
| 24.6.2022 | $0.314 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 16 articles.
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
TMX Newsfile · 10.8.2026
Yahoo · 10.8.2026
Associated Press · 7.8.2026
PR Newswire · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 7.8.2026
The Fly · 24.6.2026
Zacks · 19.6.2026
Zacks · 16.6.2026
Zacks · 10.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Telecom Argentina SA (TEO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TEO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TEO's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.7% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — TEO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
As of 2026-10-09, at a price of $12.37, the nearest support is $11.46, the nearest resistance is $13.50, a stop below support sits at $11.15. The levels come from the stock's real swing highs and lows over the last two years and are recomputed daily. Not investment advice.
Based on real trading volume (Chaikin Money Flow and weekly On-Balance Volume): mixed money flow; over the longer term money has been flowing in for 12 months.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 4 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez Baruki Luis Alberto | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 188,500 | -188,500 | $2.78 |
| Gonzalez Baruki Luis Alberto | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 0 | -188,500 | $2.78 |
| Urricelqui Alejandro Alberto | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 38,890 | +38,890 | $13.43 |
| Urricelqui Alejandro Alberto | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 399,348 | +38,890 | $13.43 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
158,350 shares short as of 2026-09-30 · vs. 234,017 on 2026-09-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology
Recent media coverage of Telecom Argentina SA (TEO) highlights strong financial performance in Q2 2026, emphasizing record EBITDA margins—up 580 basis points—driven by the full integration of Telefónica Móviles Argentina (TMA) and robust operations in Paraguay. Analysts like JP Morgan raised their price target to $21, citing improved profitability, operational efficiency, and investments in fiber infrastructure. Cablevisión Holding, the controlling shareholder, also reported positive first-half results, underscoring TEO’s growth trajectory.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
26
Fundamentals
—
Technical
19
Valuation
—
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (71) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.5% support level, likely due to its proximity to recent price action. While euphoria and FOMO are suppressed by weak momentum and divergence from peers, elevated volatility (1.13x ATR) hints at cautious selling rather than panic. The narrow narrative gap (-1) suggests sentiment and reality are nearly aligned, but the key question remains: will traders break the 1.5% anchor or hold firm? The lack of herd behavior (score 0) implies independent decision-making, though momentum remains the primary constraint.
Updated: 10/02/2026, 06:02 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reports a 580 basis point expansion in consolidated EBITDA margin"
"driven by successful TMA integration"
"reported higher revenue, expanded profitability and improved leverage for the first half of 2026"
"continued investment in fiber"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.