Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
147.40 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:28 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
138.20 ₪ - 149.90 ₪
52-Week Range
73.63 ₪ - 177.10 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
110.20 ₪
Resistance
149.90 ₪
+90.0% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 12/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.51 (3y annualized return 88.7% / max drawdown 35.4%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The stock exhibits a **moderate overall score of 67**, reflecting a balanced mix of technical strength and notable risks. On the technical front, the stock demonstrates robust momentum with a positive MACD histogram and an ADX of 27.8, indicating a strong upward trend. However, the RSI (73.6) and %K (96.1) readings signal overbought conditions, while the price remaining below the 200-day average suggests potential short-term consolidation. Risk metrics are moderately favorable, with a Calmar ratio of 2.54—highlighting high returns relative to drawdowns—though the ATR (3.6%) suggests moderate volatility. News sentiment data is absent, leaving no additional context for valuation or external drivers, which weighs on the overall assessment. The interplay between strong technical momentum and overbought signals creates a nuanced picture, where upside potential is tempered by potential reversal pressures.
The stock shows strong momentum (positive MACD, ADX 27.8) but is overbought (RSI 73.6, %K 96.1) and sits below its 200-day average, indicating a potential short-term pullback risk despite positive short-term gains (+9.7% vs. index).
Technical indicators drive near-term price action, and overbought conditions often precede reversals, while the 200-day average acts as a key support/resistance level.
No news-related evidence is provided, meaning no recent positive or negative external catalysts (e.g., earnings, regulatory changes) are factored into the analysis.
News events can significantly alter investor sentiment and stock performance, making their absence a critical data gap for long-term assessment.
The stock exhibits a high-risk/reward profile, with a Calmar ratio of 2.54 (90% annualized return over 3 years) but a 35.4% max drawdown, balanced by moderate volatility (ATR 3.6%).
The Calmar ratio suggests resilience in drawdowns, but the 35.4% peak-to-trough decline indicates vulnerability to market downturns or sector-specific shocks.
StockIQ conclusion
This stock presents a **moderate-risk, momentum-driven opportunity** with compelling technical signals (ADX, MACD) but faces near-term overbought risks and a lack of fundamental context. The high Calmar ratio underscores resilience, yet the 200-day average and overbought conditions introduce caution. Without news or fundamental data, the analysis remains technically driven, leaving room for external factors to alter the outlook. Investors should monitor for confirmation of the uptrend or signs of overbought exhaustion before making decisions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
76
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
13d ago · $137.90
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 33 to 64 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
92
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING TASE.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
50
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
66
Fundamentals
—
Technical
92
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring bias (85) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.7% resistance gap, while FOMO (64) drives momentum-driven participation. Herding (51) and euphoria (31) coexist, but the narrative gap (18) suggests optimism may outpace fundamentals. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat to prior support? Elevated volume and RSI (74) could signal either continuation or exhaustion.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:08 AM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 78/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors seeing cautious opportunity while others flag outright red flags. Howard Marks and his market-cycle variant offer the most bullish perspectives—Marks scores it reasonably priced (75) due to perceived risk alignment, while his cycle-based approach still rates it mid-cycle (53), suggesting a neutral but not alarming stance. In contrast, the more skeptical voices—like Jesse Livermore (64) and Charles Mackay (62)—warn of indecision and speculative crowd behavior, respectively, hinting at potential instability. At the extreme ends, Morgan Housel (14) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (0) dismiss it outright, framing it as volatile or overbought, while the efficient-market camp (39) dismisses active selection entirely. Meanwhile, the lack of definitive data across Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen leaves their verdicts neutral, underscoring how this stock’s ambiguous fundamentals split even the most rigorous frameworks.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 78
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 2
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (11 bullish · 1 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.3.2025 | 55.564 ₪ |
| 11.3.2025 | 55.564 ₪ |
| 14.3.2024 | 45.003 ₪ |
| 13.3.2024 | 45.003 ₪ |
| 24.12.2023 | 250.000 ₪ |
| 23.12.2023 | 250.000 ₪ |
| 30.3.2022 | 22.198 ₪ |
| 29.3.2022 | 22.198 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd (TASE.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TASE.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TASE.TA's technical score is 92/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.51 (3y annualized return 88.7% / max drawdown 35.4%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.0% of price; %K 90.6 — overbought.
Yes — TASE.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology