Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
79.93 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:26 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
79.81 ₪ - 81.97 ₪
52-Week Range
61.07 ₪ - 84.98 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
69.14 ₪
Resistance
81.97 ₪
+25.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Polimeri Europa S.p.A. (POLI.TA) exhibits a **strong overall investor score of 73**, driven primarily by robust technical performance and moderate risk metrics, though news sentiment remains neutral. The technical category scores an impressive **85**, reflecting a clear upward trend with the stock trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 68.8—indicators of healthy momentum. However, the %K value at 92.0 signals overbought conditions, which could suggest near-term consolidation. Risk metrics are relatively favorable, with a **Calmar ratio of 1.87** (indicating resilience to drawdowns) and a modest **average true range (ATR) of 1.8%**, though the 3-year annualized return of 37.5% with a 20.0% max drawdown highlights volatility. The lack of news data (score: 50) means external factors are not influencing the score, leaving the analysis reliant on technicals and risk alone.
The stock demonstrates strong bullish momentum, with prices above both short-term (50-day) and long-term (200-day) moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 68.8—all signs of upward momentum. However, the %K value at 92.0 indicates overbought conditions, which may limit further short-term gains.
Technical strength suggests sustained buying pressure, but overbought signals could trigger a pullback or correction.
No available news data exists to evaluate sentiment, market reactions, or external catalysts for POLI.TA.
Lack of news data means the analysis cannot account for company-specific or macroeconomic developments that may impact the stock.
The ATR of 1.8% indicates relatively stable volatility, while the Calmar ratio of 1.87 suggests strong risk-adjusted returns despite a 20.0% historical drawdown. The 3-year annualized return of 37.5% reflects high growth potential but also underscores sensitivity to market downturns.
The risk profile balances high returns with moderate volatility, but drawdowns remain a key consideration for investors.
StockIQ conclusion
Polimeri Europa (POLI.TA) presents a **balanced profile** with strong technical indicators supporting upward momentum, though overbought conditions and lack of news data introduce uncertainty. The risk-adjusted performance is favorable, but historical drawdowns and external risks remain unquantified. Investors should monitor technical corrections and await news-driven catalysts to assess long-term potential.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
67
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $79.93
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $79.93
Evidence: 11 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $81.07
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $81.07
Evidence: 11 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 16, 2026
Then
72
$80.74
Now
67
$79.93
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
76
Risk
58
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING POLI.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
76
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+18%
Market Narrative
46
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-4
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (79) reflects traders fixating on the 1.1% gap below resistance, a common bias when price nears psychological levels. Herding (45) suggests some alignment with peers, though FOMO (30) remains muted due to neutral RSI and modest volume. The narrow narrative gap (-1) implies no major disconnect between sentiment and fundamentals. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat if momentum stalls?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:09 PM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 34/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies that favor patient, qualitative assessments and those that demand clear quantitative edges or market timing precision. The highest-scoring approaches—like **Morgan Housel’s (75) and Charles Mackay’s (73)**—lean toward a cautious, long-term view, praising its steady growth potential or lack of speculative frenzy, while **Howard Marks (70) and Gerald Loeb (66)** see it as a reasonable risk-reward bet without obvious cycle pitfalls. In contrast, **Jesse Livermore (60) and Nelson (6)** reject it outright: Livermore’s absence of a defined trend and Nelson’s overbought cycle warning highlight starkly different risk tolerances. Meanwhile, the mid-tier scores (50s) reflect either insufficient data for rigorous analysis (Graham, Fisher, Lynch) or outright dismissal by disciplined traders (Schwager, Efficient-Market theorists), underscoring how this stock’s ambiguity splits traditional value hunters from those who prioritize trend clarity or market efficiency.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 82
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 68
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 34
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.8.2026 | 76.102 ₪ |
| 25.5.2026 | 64.898 ₪ |
| 24.5.2026 | 64.898 ₪ |
| 16.3.2026 | 75.497 ₪ |
| 15.3.2026 | 75.497 ₪ |
| 30.11.2025 | 83.809 ₪ |
| 29.11.2025 | 83.809 ₪ |
| 21.8.2025 | 96.594 ₪ |
| 20.8.2025 | 96.594 ₪ |
| 27.5.2025 | 54.563 ₪ |
| 26.5.2025 | 54.563 ₪ |
| 11.3.2025 | 28.092 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Bank Hapoalim B.M. (POLI.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for POLI.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
POLI.TA's technical score is 76/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; ATR: 1.5% of price; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — POLI.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology