Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$858.79
▲ $55.66 (+6.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$194.64B
Day Range
$807.31 - $872.00
52-Week Range
$209.00 - $1,145.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$698.99
Resistance
$1,013.99
STX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+296.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 34.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $308.05 vs. price $858.79 (-64.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $858.79
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $830.17
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
62
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
75
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING STX...
Recent media coverage of Seagate Technology highlights its strong performance driven by surging demand for storage infrastructure in AI data centers. The company’s stock has tripled in 2026, fueled by record backlogs, growing data center investments, and the expanding need for storage solutions to support AI workloads. Analysts note its potential for further gains amid a broader trend favoring memory and storage stocks over broader market declines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Seagate Technology. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
60
Fundamentals
75
Technical
62
Valuation
33
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+41
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant **overconfidence** bias, amplified by a **narrative gap** (79 vs. 42) where optimism far exceeds fundamentals. Euphoria is also present, driven by extreme valuation (+194% above DCF) and positive sentiment, while FOMO remains secondary due to modest volume. The key open question is whether this disconnect between price and intrinsic value will persist or correct, given the lack of panic or anchoring signals. The absence of herding or loss aversion implies confidence remains unshaken despite peer underperformance.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:23 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI-driven demand, record backlogs and data center growth are powering five growth stocks"
"Seagate Technology Hldgs (NASDAQ:STX) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 46.07%"
"investors rotating toward profitable storage infrastructure rather than making a random defensive trade"
"The incredible demand for storage in AI data centers suggests that Seagate's terrific rally is sustainable"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some legendary investors seeing transformative potential while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued bet. Philip Fisher’s near-perfect score suggests STX meets his rigorous criteria for exceptional company quality—likely due to strong fundamentals, management, or industry dominance. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen also see growth opportunities, though Lynch’s slightly lower score hints at a cautionary note about valuation lagging behind fundamentals. In contrast, the majority of methodologies—from Graham’s defensive framework to Howard Marks’ cycle analysis—warn of red flags, whether it’s overvaluation, late-cycle risks, or volatility that could erode patient capital. Even the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unconvincing relative to broader indices, while Mackay and Nelson’s warnings about crowd behavior or overbought cycles further polarize the debate.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 95
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 85
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 39
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 28
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 28
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 27
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 26
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 16
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 7
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
45.6%
Operating Margin
33.6%
Net Margin
26.1%
EBITDA Margin
35.8%
ROE
146.9%
ROA
31.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$14.54
Cash
$1.70B
Total Debt
$3.56B
Current Ratio
1.67
Debt/Equity
1.65
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.6.2026 | $0.740 |
| 23.6.2026 | $0.740 |
| 25.3.2026 | $0.740 |
| 24.3.2026 | $0.740 |
| 24.12.2025 | $0.740 |
| 23.12.2025 | $0.740 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.720 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.720 |
| 25.6.2025 | $0.720 |
| 24.6.2025 | $0.720 |
| 19.3.2025 | $0.720 |
| 18.3.2025 | $0.720 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$858.79
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$308.05
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-64.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
20.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.5% | $3.74B | $3.43B |
| 2 | 16.0% | $4.34B | $3.66B |
| 3 | 11.5% | $4.84B | $3.74B |
| 4 | 7.0% | $5.18B | $3.67B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $5.31B | $3.45B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$3.10B
Terminal Value
$83.78B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$54.45B
Enterprise Value
$72.40B
Net Debt
$1.86B
Equity Value
$70.54B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.46
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.13
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Seagate Technology (STX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
STX currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, STX's estimated fair value is $308.05, which is 64.1% below the current price of $858.79. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
STX's technical score is 62/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 34.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 105.3%; Free cash flow growth: 279.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $308.05 vs. price $858.79 (-64.1%); ATR: 6.1% of price; Debt/equity: 1.65.
Yes — STX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romano Gianluca | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 825.5 | -825.5 | $862.13 |
| MOSLEY WILLIAM D | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 1,315.75 | -1,315.75 | $862.14 |
| MOSLEY WILLIAM D | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 1,533.5 | -1,533.5 | $862.13 |
| Romano Gianluca | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 522.5 | -522.5 | $862.13 |
| Morris John Christopher | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 319.25 | -319.25 | $862.14 |
| Morris John Christopher | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 253 | -253 | $862.13 |
| Teh Ban Seng | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 663 | -663 | $860.09 |
| Morris John Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 631 | -631 | — |
| MOSLEY WILLIAM D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 2,415 | -2,415 | — |
| Romano Gianluca | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 1,515 | -1,515 | — |
| MOSLEY WILLIAM D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 2,815 | +2,815 | — |
| MOSLEY WILLIAM D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 2,815 | -2,815 | — |
| MOSLEY WILLIAM D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 2,415 | +2,415 | — |
| Romano Gianluca | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 1,515 | +1,515 | — |
| Romano Gianluca | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 959 | -959 | — |
| Romano Gianluca | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 959 | +959 | — |
| Morris John Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 500 | -500 | — |
| Chong Kian Fatt | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 202 | -202 | — |
| Chong Kian Fatt | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 379 | -379 | — |
| Morris John Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 500 | +500 | — |
| Morris John Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 631 | +631 | — |
| Teh Ban Seng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 600 | +600 | — |
| Teh Ban Seng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 600 | -600 | — |
| Teh Ban Seng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 663 | +663 | — |
| Teh Ban Seng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 663 | -663 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,482,797 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,047,106 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology