Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Materials · ·
$238.23
▼ $0.99 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 09:54 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$34.15B
Day Range
$235.20 - $243.64
52-Week Range
$134.87 - $288.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
STLD is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+70.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 2233.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $21.46 vs. price $238.23 (-91.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
50
Risk
62
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
59
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING STLD...
Recent media coverage of Steel Dynamics (STLD) has primarily focused on its stock performance amid broader market fluctuations, highlighting a slight dip in share price by around 1.6% in early September. Analysts also noted the company’s strong dividend fundamentals, including consistent growth and a low payout ratio, positioning it favorably for sustainable returns. Additionally, the broader steel sector faced volatility due to escalating U.S.-Canada trade tensions, impacting related stocks and ETFs. No company-specific operational or strategic updates were prominently featured.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Steel Dynamics. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
59
Technical
50
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
73
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
STLD’s psychology is dominated by overconfidence (52), as price momentum outpaces fundamentals and valuation is extreme. The narrative-reality gap (45) suggests traders may be ignoring risks. Herding and loss aversion (44) hint at lingering caution, but euphoria (35) and FOMO (17) indicate selective optimism. The key question: is the disconnect between price and fundamentals sustainable, or will it trigger a re-evaluation?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 06:16 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Steel Dynamics (STLD) stock rallied after a proposed 50% tariff on Canadian steel and vehicles was announced."
"Steel Dynamics (STLD) closed at $242.06, indicating a -1.61% shift from the previous trading day."
"Steel Dynamics (STLD) passes the Best Dividend screen with solid dividend growth, a low 18% payout ratio, and healthy fundamentals."
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Walter Bagehot’s documented principles, the model estimates strong liquidity and the ability to survive a credit squeeze, which is why his score is the highest at 79. By contrast, Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria and Peter Lynch’s growth‑at‑a‑reasonable‑price bar flag the stock as unattractive, resulting in the lowest scores of 27 and 23 respectively. The moderate scores from Gerald Loeb, Edgar Lawrence Smith, Jesse Livermore, Morgan Housel and Charles Mackay (around 55‑60) reflect a view of reasonable risk but no clear trend or compelling upside. Overall, the divergence stems from liquidity‑focused frameworks rating the stock positively while value‑ and quality‑oriented methodologies rate it poorly, producing a split assessment of STLD.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 79
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 59
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 51
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 39
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 23
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$218.02
Range Bottom
$273.36
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
13.2%
Operating Margin
8.1%
Net Margin
6.5%
EBITDA Margin
11.2%
ROE
13.2%
ROA
7.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.02
Cash
$769.88M
Total Debt
$4.21B
Current Ratio
3.06
Debt/Equity
0.47
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.530 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.530 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.530 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.530 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.500 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$238.23
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$21.46
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-91.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $476.43M | $437.09M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $461.55M | $388.47M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $455.78M | $351.94M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $458.62M | $324.90M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $470.09M | $305.53M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$501.51M
Terminal Value
$7.41B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.82B
Enterprise Value
$6.63B
Net Debt
$3.44B
Equity Value
$3.18B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$60.36
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$54.91
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Barchart · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Steel Dynamics (STLD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
STLD currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, STLD's estimated fair value is $21.46, which is 91.0% below the current price of $238.23. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
STLD's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 2233.8%; Debt/equity: 0.47; Current ratio: 3.06.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $21.46 vs. price $238.23 (-91.0%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -18.8%.
Yes — STLD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamann Jennifer L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 72 | +72 | — |
| MILLETT MARK D | Gift | 28.7.2026 | 300 | -300 | — |
| MILLETT MARK D | Gift | 28.7.2026 | 3,016,401 | -300 | — |
| BARGABOS SHEREE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 43 | +43 | — |
| DOLAN TRACI M | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 102 | +102 | — |
| Cornew Kenneth W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 2 | +2 | — |
| Hamann Jennifer L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 18 | +18 | — |
| Seaman Bradley S | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 109 | +109 | — |
| Sierra Luis Manuel | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 7 | +7 | — |
| BARGABOS SHEREE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 27,105 | +43 | — |
| Cornew Kenneth W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 32,013 | +2 | — |
| DOLAN TRACI M | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 58,970 | +102 | — |
| Hamann Jennifer L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 5,304 | +18 | — |
| Seaman Bradley S | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 51,600 | +109 | — |
| Sierra Luis Manuel | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 11,523 | +7 | — |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 322 | -322 | $269.93 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 4,401 | -4,401 | $269.22 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 4,177 | -4,177 | $268.42 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $267.35 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 111,737 | -1,100 | $267.35 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 107,560 | -4,177 | $268.42 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 103,159 | -4,401 | $269.22 |
| Anderson James Stanley | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 102,837 | -322 | $269.93 |
| Sierra Luis Manuel | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 712 | +712 | — |
| BARGABOS SHEREE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 712 | +712 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,809,629 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,056,934 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology