Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$24.75
▲ $0.32 (+1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:26 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.88B
Day Range
$24.11 - $24.75
52-Week Range
$17.17 - $26.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$22.36
Resistance
$26.48
+37.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 23.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Return on assets (ROA)
Return on assets (ROA): 3.7% — weak
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
71
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 16, 2026
Then
70
$24.67
Now
71
$24.75
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
90
Risk
64
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
57
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT) has centered on its stock valuation and financial performance. Analysts discuss whether its shares are undervalued, citing strong Q2 earnings—particularly underwriting profitability—and a recent 140% five-year return. Post-earnings reports, the stock briefly declined but remained under scrutiny for potential upside, with debates over its discount valuation and growth momentum. Investor focus remains on earnings trends and long-term valuation prospects.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SiriusPoint Ltd. Common. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 18 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
57
Technical
90
Valuation
55
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SPNT’s psychology is fragmented but dominated by **FOMO and Herding**, with FOMO fueled by momentum (+4.7% ROC), elevated volume (1.10x avg), and strong sentiment (80/100). Herding’s low score stems from the stock’s relative underperformance against peers, suggesting selective participation rather than blanket follow-the-crowd behavior. The narrative gap (62 vs. 40) hints at overestimation of tailwinds, while euphoria and overconfidence remain muted due to modest overvaluation and EPS lag. The key question: *Is the momentum self-sustaining, or will peer outperformance trigger reallocation?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:38 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"SiriusPoint (SPNT) Could Be 11% Undervalued As Earnings Refocus Attention"
"SiriusPoint Ltd (SPNT) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Underwriting Profitability"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between growth-focused and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch and Benjamin Graham’s high scores (99 and 97, respectively) suggest it’s a compelling opportunity for investors prioritizing either explosive growth or deep undervaluation—Lynch sees untapped upside, while Graham’s defensive take hints at a resilient, cash-rich business. Meanwhile, Fisher, Smith, and Housel (scores 73–71) lean toward a more measured, long-term hold, praising its fundamentals and compounding potential, though none call it exceptional. On the other end, the lowest scores (from Schwager, Nelson, and Livermore) flag red flags: cycle overreach, lack of trend clarity, or stretched valuations, aligning with methodologies that distrust speculative momentum or crowded trades. The contrast underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in its growth narrative (backed by Lynch and Veblen) or its speculative risks (rejected by Schwager and Marks’ late-cycle warning).
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 99
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 96
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 94
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 73
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 72
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 72
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 70
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 54
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 19
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$22.36
Range Bottom
$26.48
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
14.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
18.6%
ROA
3.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.80
Cash
$731.20M
Total Debt
$688.60M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.28
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$20.30
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$19.31
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 18 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 3.8.2026
MarketBeat · 1.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
ChartMill · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
SiriusPoint Ltd. Common (SPNT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 71/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SPNT currently scores 71/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SPNT's technical score is 90/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 23.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 250.0%; Net income growth: 129.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on assets (ROA): 3.7% — weak.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SPNT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Thomas C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 1,702 | -1,702 | $24.18 |
| McKinney James J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.5.2026 | 3,648 | -3,648 | $21.35 |
| McKinney James J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.5.2026 | 50,711 | -3,648 | $21.35 |
| Masojada Bronislaw Edmund | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Ludlow Sharon M | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Mahmud Mehdi | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Purtill Sabra R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Robart Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Cross Susan Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Hudson Martin Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Cross Susan Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 23,887 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Purtill Sabra R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 5,903 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Masojada Bronislaw Edmund | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 65,727 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Mahmud Mehdi | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 123,558 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Ludlow Sharon M | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 160,693 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Robart Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 97,303 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Hudson Martin Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 9,601 | +5,903 | $23.29 |
| Egan Scott | Other Transaction | 11.5.2026 | 16,582 | +16,582 | — |
| Egan Scott | Other Transaction | 11.5.2026 | 16,582 | -16,582 | — |
| Egan Scott | Other Transaction | 11.5.2026 | 117,213 | -16,582 | — |
| Egan Scott | Other Transaction | 11.5.2026 | 1,336,694 | +16,582 | — |
| Leonardo Thomas C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.4.2026 | 2,413 | -2,413 | $23.29 |
| Charles Patrick John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.4.2026 | 1,068 | -1,068 | $23.29 |
| Govrin David E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.4.2026 | 4,488 | -4,488 | $23.29 |
| McKinney James J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.4.2026 | 2,620 | -2,620 | $23.29 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,105,479 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,632,483 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 76.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology