Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$22.51
▼ $0.68 (-2.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:31 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$22.18 - $23.23
52-Week Range
$11.81 - $24.26
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$17.32
Resistance
$24.25
S is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+20.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 21.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $5.87 vs. price $22.51 (-73.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $22.61
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 66)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $22.61
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 45 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
90
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
31
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of SentinelOne centers on its aggressive rollout of AI‑powered cybersecurity tools, especially the expanded Wayfinder Frontier AI Services that integrate OpenAI’s Daybreak models (including GPT‑5.6‑Cyber). Analysts note the company’s August stock surge following new software extensions and partnerships, alongside its Q2 results—$291.98 million revenue, a $93.4 million loss, and an upgraded full‑year revenue outlook of $1.20‑$1.21 billion. The press also compares SentinelOne’s AI model to rivals like Cloudflare amid OpenAI’s $1 billion cyber initiative.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SentinelOne, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
56
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
31
Technical
90
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+50%
Market Narrative
86
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+45
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a dominant euphoria, reflected by a 43% premium above the 200‑day average, a 295% DCF valuation gap, and flawless news sentiment. Overconfidence is also evident, as price gains outpace a -0.5% EPS decline, indicating possible disconnect from fundamentals. Moderate FOMO signals some buying pressure, while anchoring remains limited, suggesting the rally is primarily sentiment‑driven. The key open question is whether upcoming earnings or a valuation correction will temper the current euphoria.
Updated: 09/18/2026, 11:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"SentinelOne expanded Wayfinder Frontier AI Services with new integrations of OpenAI Daybreak models to detect complex threats and automate risk assessments (Yahoo #6)."
"OpenAI’s $1B cyber push backs Cloudflare and SentinelOne, with Daybreak models now integrated into SentinelOne’s Wayfinder (Yahoo #9)."
"SentinelOne raised full-year revenue guidance to $1.20–$1.21B after Q2 revenue of $291.98M (Yahoo #5)."
"Cybersecurity stocks shift focus from revenue growth to profit efficiency as margin discipline drives market reactions (ChartMill #10)."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 71/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some seeing strong potential while others flag significant red flags. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock may be near a cyclical low, aligning with his contrarian, oversold-focused approach. Meanwhile, long-term buy-and-hold advocates like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Philip Fisher still find merit, though Fisher’s lower score implies it lacks the exceptional quality he prized. On the other end, value-focused investors like Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant dismiss it outright, citing valuation concerns and weak defensive metrics. Even moderate strategies like Morgan Housel and Peter Lynch see it as holdable but not effortless, while market efficiency skeptics like Jesse Livermore and Howard Marks warn of late-cycle risks or negative trends. The contrast highlights how cyclical, growth-oriented, and value-driven investors can reach wildly different conclusions from the same data.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 71
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 65
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 44
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 38
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 27
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 26
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 23
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 12
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 6
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
74.1%
Operating Margin
-32.1%
Net Margin
-45.0%
EBITDA Margin
-26.6%
ROE
-31.4%
ROA
-18.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.37
Cash
$169.63M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.39
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$22.51
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$5.87
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-73.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $94.88M | $87.04M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $113.26M | $95.33M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $128.83M | $99.48M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $139.30M | $98.69M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $142.79M | $92.80M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$75.90M
Terminal Value
$2.25B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.46B
Enterprise Value
$1.94B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.94B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$4.35
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.20
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Trefis · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
The Fly · 17.9.2026
The Fly · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 17.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 17.9.2026
SentinelOne, Inc. (S) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
S currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, S's estimated fair value is $5.87, which is 73.9% below the current price of $22.51. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
S's technical score is 90/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 21.9%; Free cash flow growth: 138.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $5.87 vs. price $22.51 (-73.9%); Operating margin: -32.1% (negative); Net margin: -45.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for S.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weingarten Tomer | Conversion of Derivative Security | 11.9.2026 | 57,941 | +57,941 | — |
| Weingarten Tomer | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 114,890 | -114,890 | $19.89 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Conversion of Derivative Security | 11.9.2026 | 57,941 | -57,941 | — |
| TOMASELLO ROBIN | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 13,311 | -13,311 | $19.95 |
| Conder Keenan Michael | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 8,312 | -8,312 | $19.79 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 38,759 | -38,759 | $19.79 |
| Parekh Sonalee Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 21,664 | -21,664 | $19.44 |
| TOMASELLO ROBIN | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 7,235 | -7,235 | $19.44 |
| TOMASELLO ROBIN | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 14,205 | -14,205 | $19.79 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 53,811 | -53,811 | $20.08 |
| TOMASELLO ROBIN | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 5,467 | -5,467 | $20.08 |
| PADGETT BARRY L. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 9,778 | -9,778 | $20.09 |
| Pinczuk Ana G. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 6,230 | -6,230 | $20.09 |
| Conder Keenan Michael | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 26,374 | -26,374 | $20.08 |
| PADGETT BARRY L. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 977,430 | -9,778 | $20.09 |
| Conder Keenan Michael | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 956,358 | -26,374 | $20.08 |
| TOMASELLO ROBIN | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 439,863 | -5,467 | $20.08 |
| Pinczuk Ana G. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 737,716 | -6,230 | $20.09 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 1,840,586 | -53,811 | $20.08 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Conversion of Derivative Security | 31.7.2026 | 57,941 | -57,941 | — |
| Weingarten Tomer | Open Market Sale | 31.7.2026 | 57,941 | -57,941 | $18.75 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Conversion of Derivative Security | 31.7.2026 | 57,941 | +57,941 | — |
| Weingarten Tomer | Conversion of Derivative Security | 31.7.2026 | 1,952,338 | +57,941 | — |
| Weingarten Tomer | Open Market Sale | 31.7.2026 | 1,894,397 | -57,941 | $18.75 |
| Weingarten Tomer | Conversion of Derivative Security | 31.7.2026 | 3,479,094 | -57,941 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
18,233,384 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 18,878,488 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 37.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology