Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Miscellaneous · ·
$8.53
▼ $0.20 (-2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:00 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.05B
Day Range
$8.36 - $8.81
52-Week Range
$8.19 - $22.44
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$8.19
Resistance
$13.35
-47.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 45.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -4.3% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
58
Value
60
Momentum
32
Risk
34
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Sunrun Inc. (RUN) has primarily focused on its involvement in California’s **SHARE virtual power plant (VPP) initiative**, a collaborative project with PG&E, Google, Tesla, and other energy firms. The VPP aims to integrate 21,000 home energy devices—like batteries and smart appliances—to improve grid reliability and manage peak demand. While Sunrun’s direct financial or operational updates are sparse in these headlines, its participation highlights its role in advancing residential energy solutions and grid innovation. Most attention centers on broader industry trends rather than Sunrun-specific developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Sunrun Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
48
Technical
32
Valuation
60
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-37%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant loss aversion—driven by a 22.5% three-month decline—suggests investors are prioritizing risk mitigation over potential upside. The narrative gap (62 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect where optimism (e.g., high sentiment) clashes with observable underperformance. Herding is present but limited, as RUN’s outperformance today contrasts with peer stagnation. Key uncertainty remains: whether volume spikes or a break below key support will either reinforce loss aversion or trigger a shift toward caution or opportunism.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:24 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"PG&E, together with Rewiring America, Google, Carrier Global Corporation, **Tesla, Sunrun**, Renew Home, Demand [...]"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors seeing it as a high-potential opportunity while others flag it as risky or overvalued. Benjamin Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* and Peter Lynch both rate it near the top, emphasizing its statistical undervaluation and growth potential, respectively—suggesting a strong case for long-term investors willing to tolerate volatility. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher and Charles Mackay also endorse it, praising its quality and lack of speculative mania, reinforcing its appeal to value and quality-focused strategists. However, the contrast is stark with Morgan Housel and Gerald Loeb, who dismiss it outright, warning of excessive volatility and unacceptable risk—aligning with a contrarian or defensive stance. Even Howard Marks splits his views, seeing it as mid-cycle but questioning whether market expectations have already priced in its potential, while Livermore and Bagehot flag liquidity and trend risks, respectively. The divide underscores whether the stock’s fundamentals justify its perceived risk or if it’s a speculative bet with limited upside.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 90
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 83
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 79
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 69
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 28
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 22
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-4.3%
Net Margin
15.2%
EBITDA Margin
-3.0%
ROE
14.4%
ROA
2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.96
Cash
$1.24B
Total Debt
$14.70B
Current Ratio
1.66
Debt/Equity
4.69
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$11.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Trefis · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
POWER Magazine · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Sunrun Inc. (RUN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RUN currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
RUN's technical score is 32/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 45.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 113.3%; Net income growth: 115.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -4.3% (negative); ATR: 5.7% of price; Calmar: -0.22 (3y annualized return -16.0% / max drawdown 73.7%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RUN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurich Lynn Michelle | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $9.96 |
| Jurich Lynn Michelle | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 367,405 | -50,000 | $9.96 |
| Barak Maria | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 3,278 | -3,278 | $12.17 |
| Barak Maria | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 90,033 | -3,278 | $12.17 |
| STEELE JEANNA | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 9,897 | -9,897 | $13.19 |
| Abajian Danny | Gift | 6.7.2026 | 17,052 | +17,052 | — |
| Abajian Danny | Gift | 6.7.2026 | 17,052 | -17,052 | — |
| Powell Mary | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 23,985 | -23,985 | $13.19 |
| Abajian Danny | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 16,495 | -16,495 | $13.19 |
| Barak Maria | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 1,747 | -1,747 | $13.17 |
| Dickson Paul S. | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 15,613 | -15,613 | $13.18 |
| Dickson Paul S. | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 839,539 | -15,613 | $13.18 |
| Powell Mary | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 1,111,535 | -23,985 | $13.19 |
| STEELE JEANNA | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 461,715 | -9,897 | $13.19 |
| Abajian Danny | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 420,318 | -16,495 | $13.19 |
| Abajian Danny | Gift | 6.7.2026 | 403,266 | -17,052 | — |
| Abajian Danny | Gift | 6.7.2026 | 374,105 | +17,052 | — |
| Barak Maria | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 93,311 | -1,747 | $13.17 |
| Jurich Lynn Michelle | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $13.61 |
| Jurich Lynn Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 8,314 | +8,314 | — |
| Fenster Edward Harris | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 8,314 | +8,314 | — |
| Jurich Lynn Michelle | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 409,091 | -50,000 | $13.61 |
| Fenster Edward Harris | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 1,567,779 | +8,314 | — |
| Jurich Lynn Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 417,405 | +8,314 | — |
| Lontoh Sonita | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $12.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
68,503,543 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 64,700,228 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 32.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology