Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$5.72
▲ $0.03 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 07:24 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.15B
Day Range
$5.65 - $5.85
52-Week Range
$4.93 - $15.49
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$5.40
Resistance
$7.94
PCT is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-58.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 30.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$18.98 vs. price $5.72 (-431.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
34
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
No data available
Value
38
Momentum
16
Risk
40
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
30
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of PureCycle Technologies has centered on its **Q2 2026 financial underperformance**, where the company reported **missed earnings estimates**—both adjusted EPS ($0.33 vs. $0.29 expected) and revenue ($4.512M vs. $6.104M forecast)—alongside a **59% increase in quarterly losses**. Despite progress in commercial partnerships, like the launch of the **SnapPack Square EVO container line** with IPL Schoeller, analysts like Cantor Fitzgerald maintained an **Overweight rating** but lowered their price target to $12. Market reaction saw a **10% stock decline** post-results.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about PureCycle Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 26. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 2 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
49
Fundamentals
30
Technical
16
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-34%
Market Narrative
24
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for PCT strongly suggests **loss aversion dominance**, as the stock’s steep 3-month drop (-48.9%) and subdued trading volume (0.75x average) align with investors clinging to positions to avoid further losses. The narrative gap (-27) further implies a disconnect between market sentiment (pessimistic) and potential reality, reinforcing reluctance to sell. While panic selling (32) is present, it’s overshadowed by the extreme aversion to losses. The key open question is whether the subdued volume reflects genuine caution or merely a lack of liquidity to fuel further declines.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:23 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported quarterly losses of $(0.33) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.29) by 13.79 percent"
"Cantor Fitzgerald lowers price target from $14 to $12"
"stock falls 10% after hours despite strong growth and commercial milestones"
"IPL Schoeller & PureCycle Launch Off-the-Shelf Container Line, SnapPack Square EVO, Ahead of State Sustainability Mandates"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark divide among methodologies, with some models seeing potential while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued bet. On one end, Peter Lynch and Charles Mackay both score it near-perfectly—Lynch lacks sufficient growth data to form a definitive opinion, while Mackay sees no signs of speculative mania, suggesting a calm, rational market environment. Meanwhile, Howard Marks (both cycle and general) and Samuel Nelson lean favorably, viewing it as early-to-mid cycle with room to run, though Marks’ general approach remains cautiously optimistic. In contrast, the value-oriented camp—Graham (defensive and enterprising), Loeb, and Malkiel/Bogle—piles on red flags, with Graham dismissing it outright for lacking defensive traits and Malkiel/Bogle dismissing it as a poor fit for passive indexing. Fisher and Livermore are the most dismissive, with Fisher rejecting its lack of quality/growth and Livermore’s trend-following rule working against it. The middle ground, represented by Veblen, Schwager, and Bagehot, offers mixed signals—Bagehot praises its liquidity, but Veblen and Schwager remain unsure about its profitability potential, while Housel warns of volatility that could unsettle patient investors.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 36
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 30
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 18
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 16
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-2171.6%
Net Margin
-2185.1%
EBITDA Margin
-2171.6%
ROE
-397.9%
ROA
-19.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.08
Cash
$156.69M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.26
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.72
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$18.98
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-431.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-201.95M | $-185.27M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-218.35M | $-183.78M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-232.00M | $-179.15M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-242.15M | $-171.55M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-248.20M | $-161.32M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-183.59M
Terminal Value
$-3.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-2.54B
Enterprise Value
$-3.42B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-3.42B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.25
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.25
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 2 positive, 12 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 13.9.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 8.8.2026
Moby · 7.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
ChartMill · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 24.7.2026
Yahoo · 24.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 23.7.2026
Yahoo · 23.7.2026
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 34/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PCT currently scores 34/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PCT's estimated fair value is -$18.98, which is 431.8% below the current price of $5.72. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PCT's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 30.9%; Net income growth: 36.9%; Current ratio: 2.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$18.98 vs. price $5.72 (-431.8%); Operating margin: -2171.6% (negative); Net margin: -2185.1% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for PCT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Musa Fernando | Open Market Purchase | 4.9.2026 | 15,479 | +15,479 | $6.38 |
| Kalter Brad | O | 24.8.2026 | 133,327 | -50,000 | — |
| Kalter Brad | O | 24.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | — |
| Olson Dustin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 11,149 | -11,149 | $6.87 |
| Olson Dustin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 1,309,960 | -11,149 | $6.87 |
| SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLC | Disposition to the Company | 15.6.2026 | 0 | +0 | $1,050.00 |
| Carpenter Donald | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.5.2026 | 3,017 | -3,017 | $11.86 |
| Olson Dustin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.5.2026 | 2,141 | -2,141 | $11.86 |
| Olson Dustin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.5.2026 | 1,321,109 | -2,141 | $11.86 |
| Carpenter Donald | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.5.2026 | 96,564 | -3,017 | $11.86 |
| SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLC | Open Market Purchase | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| Jirapongphan Siri | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| BOUCK STEVEN F | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| Mars Valerie Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| Burnell Tanya | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| Coombs Daniel M | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| Musa Fernando | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| Jacoby Allen | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 16,622 | +16,622 | — |
| BOUCK STEVEN F | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 101,788 | +16,622 | — |
| Coombs Daniel M | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 156,843 | +16,622 | — |
| Musa Fernando | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 160,504 | +16,622 | — |
| Burnell Tanya | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 106,422 | +16,622 | — |
| Jacoby Allen | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 96,088 | +16,622 | — |
| SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLC | Open Market Purchase | 12.5.2026 | 34,113,545 | +16,622 | — |
| Jirapongphan Siri | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 21,171 | +16,622 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
55,536,978 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 57,025,807 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology