Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$251.53
▲ $1.06 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:34 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$5.24B
Day Range
$247.30 - $252.15
52-Week Range
$109.61 - $304.58
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$188.51
Resistance
$304.58
MTRN is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+106.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1178.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.7% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
8d ago · $250.34
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
72
Risk
48
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
42
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Materion Corporation (MTRN)** has centered on its stock performance and market positioning within the basic materials sector, particularly in relation to supply chain dynamics. Analysts at Jefferies initiated coverage with a **Buy rating and a $314 price target**, citing growing demand for critical minerals due to electrification, AI, and defense investments—though they also noted supply bottlenecks. Meanwhile, a **board member sold shares worth over $470K**, reflecting insider activity amid fluctuating market sentiment. Comparisons to peers like Aperam (APEMY) highlight sector-wide performance trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Materion Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
42
Technical
72
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a dominant narrative-reality disconnect (gap: 31) where euphoria (score: 35) aligns with strong momentum, positive sentiment, and a 14.5% premium over the 200-day average. FOMO (score: 30) is secondary, driven by moderate volume and RSI neutrality, but not extreme. The key open question is whether this disconnect reflects overvaluation or justified optimism—evidence shows price momentum slightly trailing EPS growth, hinting at potential caution. The absence of panic or herding implies confidence remains anchored in fundamentals despite speculative tailwinds.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:50 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Jefferies initiated coverage arguing that electrification, AI and rising defense and space investment are creating durable demand, but also supply bottlenecks across critical minerals."
"EMILY LIGGETT, Board Member at Materion, sold 1,012 shares of Materion worth $235K."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value/cycle-aware methodologies. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith, both bullish on high-growth potential, see it as a long-term candidate—Lynch even suggests the price hasn’t fully reflected its upside, while Smith endorses a ‘buy-and-hold for a decade’ approach. Meanwhile, Walter Bagehot and Samuel Armstrong Nelson highlight liquidity and cyclical positioning as strengths, with Nelson noting it’s closer to oversold territory. However, value-oriented investors like Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher dismiss it outright, with Graham calling it ‘defensive’ and Fisher finding no signature of quality/growth. The middle ground—Howard Marks, Jack Schwager, and the efficient-market camp—cautions against overpaying, with Marks warning of inflated expectations and Schwager’s wizards advising against entry. The contrast reveals a tension between optimism about growth and skepticism about valuation or volatility, with only a few methodologies finding enough merit to justify a bullish stance.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 83
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 71
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 36
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 29
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
17.3%
Operating Margin
6.2%
Net Margin
4.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.9%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.61
Cash
$13.68M
Total Debt
$458.79M
Current Ratio
3.11
Debt/Equity
0.50
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.145 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.145 |
| 27.5.2026 | $0.145 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.140 |
| 18.2.2026 | $0.140 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.140 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.140 |
| 22.8.2025 | $0.140 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.140 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.140 |
| 28.5.2025 | $0.140 |
| 20.2.2025 | $0.135 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$45.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$40.39
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Fintel · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Investing.com · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
Materion Corporation (MTRN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MTRN currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
MTRN's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1178.6%; Net income growth: 1170.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.7% of price; -10.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index; P/E: 66.2.
Yes — MTRN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vijayvargiya Jugal K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 11 | +11 | — |
| LIGGETT EMILY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 0.75 | +0.75 | — |
| Chemnitz Gregory R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 2 | +2 | — |
| PHILLIPPY ROBERT J | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 7.082 | +7.082 | — |
| Fashinpaur Melissa A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | — |
| Prevost Patrick M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 9.652 | +9.652 | — |
| SHULAR CRAIG S | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 31.14 | +31.14 | — |
| KHILNANI VINOD M | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 11.784 | +11.784 | — |
| Chadwick Shelly Marie | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| LIGGETT EMILY M | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,012 | -1,012 | $232.42 |
| KHILNANI VINOD M | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $235.16 |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 0 | -28,832 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 28,832 | +28,832 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 28,832 | -28,832 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 28,832 | +28,832 | — |
| LIGGETT EMILY M | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 4,173 | -1,609 | — |
| LIGGETT EMILY M | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 1,609 | -1,609 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 28,832 | -28,832 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 28,832 | +28,832 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 28,832 | +28,832 | — |
| Toth Robert B | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 0 | -28,832 | — |
| Vijayvargiya Jugal K. | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 287 | -287 | $288.29 |
| Chadwick Shelly Marie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 3,267 | -3,267 | $293.40 |
| Vijayvargiya Jugal K. | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 286 | -286 | $295.17 |
| Chadwick Shelly Marie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 2,800 | -2,800 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
619,190 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 572,557 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology