Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$153.92
▲ $21.67 (+16.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:09 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$136.43 - $154.02
52-Week Range
$81.81 - $365.21
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$89.21
Resistance
$154.02
-55.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.19
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$25.12 vs. price $153.92 (-116.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $153.92
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 41 to 66 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $153.92
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 17 to 66 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
16d ago · $144.82
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 65)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
47
Value
43
Momentum
89
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
39
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Strategy Inc highlights its shifting financial strategies and Bitcoin-related activities. The company announced a $250 million Bitcoin-themed sneaker drop, doubled its $2 billion stock buyback, and briefly resumed Bitcoin purchases before abruptly halting them. CEO comments clarified past "never sell" statements as marketing, while Strategy pivoted to buying $176 million in its preferred stock, raising questions about its Bitcoin treasury focus and stock performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Strategy Inc. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
59
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
22
Investors appear highly excited (59), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (22).
Psychology
99
Fundamentals
39
Technical
89
Valuation
43
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+37%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
22
Narrative Gap
+66
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
MSTR’s psychology suggests traders are overconfident, prioritizing momentum (+22.9% ROC) over fundamentals (EPS growth -1.5%). The narrative gap (55) and confirmation bias (55) imply investors are selectively validating positive narratives while ignoring deteriorating margins. FOMO (54) and euphoria (38) further indicate a risk-taking mindset, though panic (7) and anchoring (2) remain subdued. The key question: *Will traders sustain overconfidence despite widening reality gaps?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Strategy buys $176M STRC in sudden pivot from bitcoin"
"Strategy doubles STRC buyback to $2 billion as Bitcoin treasury grows"
"Strategy CEO says 'never sell' was just a marketing slogan"
"Strategy Didn’t Touch Bitcoin Last Week After Making First Purchase Since June"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two starkly contrasting camps: the value and trend-following investors see it as a compelling opportunity, while the growth, market efficiency, and behavioral analysts view it with skepticism. Benjamin Graham and Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect scores reflect their focus on fundamentals, liquidity, and defensive metrics, suggesting MSTR meets their strict criteria for stability and undervaluation. Meanwhile, Jesse Livermore’s positive trend signal aligns with its strong price action, reinforcing a momentum-driven case. However, the growth-oriented and market-efficiency schools—like Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, and the Efficient Market Hypothesis—reject it outright, citing either lack of growth justification or the inefficiency of active selection. Even Howard Marks, despite acknowledging the business quality, warns of inflated expectations, while behavioral analysts like Morgan Housel and Samuel Nelson flag volatility and speculative crowding as red flags. The divide underscores whether the stock’s strength lies in its fundamentals or its speculative momentum.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 83
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 83
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 41
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 32
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 10
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
68.7%
Operating Margin
-1140.8%
Net Margin
-806.3%
EBITDA Margin
-1135.5%
ROE
-8.7%
ROA
-6.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$15.23
Cash
$2.30B
Total Debt
$8.19B
Current Ratio
5.62
Debt/Equity
0.19
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$153.92
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$25.12
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-116.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.4% | $-74.39M | $-68.24M |
| 2 | -0.4% | $-74.06M | $-62.34M |
| 3 | 0.5% | $-74.47M | $-57.50M |
| 4 | 1.5% | $-75.60M | $-53.56M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-77.49M | $-50.36M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-75.45M
Terminal Value
$-1.22B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-794.18M
Enterprise Value
$-1.09B
Net Debt
$5.89B
Equity Value
$-6.97B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$158.91
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$158.91
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Strategy Inc (MSTR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MSTR currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MSTR's estimated fair value is -$25.12, which is 116.3% below the current price of $153.92. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MSTR's technical score is 89/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.19; Current ratio: 5.62; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$25.12 vs. price $153.92 (-116.3%); Operating margin: -1140.8% (negative); Net margin: -806.3% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MSTR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chow Thomas C. | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 106 | -106 | $138.75 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 30,256 | +1,850 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 26,750 | -1,850 | — |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 28,406 | -925 | $131.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 29,331 | -925 | $129.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 1,850 | -1,850 | — |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | $129.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | $131.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 1,850 | +1,850 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 28,600 | -2,775 | — |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 29,331 | +925 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 28,406 | -925 | $124.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 2,775 | -2,775 | — |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 925 | +925 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | $125.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | $124.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | $127.00 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 925 | +925 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 925 | +925 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 29,331 | +925 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 31,375 | -925 | — |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 28,406 | -925 | $122.34 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | — |
| Patten Jarrod M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 925 | +925 | $18.24 |
| Patten Jarrod M | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 925 | -925 | $122.34 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
32,622,124 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 32,480,941 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 33.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology