Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
45.48 ₪
▼ 0.19 ₪ (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/18 05:45 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
44.76 ₪ - 45.95 ₪
52-Week Range
32.74 ₪ - 61.58 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+23.8% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 6/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is below the 200-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
MRIN.TA’s **investorScore of 68** reflects a balanced yet cautiously optimistic technical profile, tempered by modest news sentiment and moderate risk exposure. The stock demonstrates strong technical momentum, with its price firmly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 63.9—indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the %K value at 100.0 suggests the stock is overbought, which could signal potential short-term volatility or a pullback. The lack of explicit news data (score of 50) means external factors are either neutral or not yet reflected in the stock’s valuation. Risk metrics reveal volatility (ATR: 3.9%) and a historically high return (78.2% annualized) buttressed by a significant drawdown (45.2%), suggesting the stock carries moderate risk-reward trade-offs. Overall, the score leans toward stability with room for caution due to overbought conditions and limited news-driven catalysts.
The stock exhibits strong uptrend signals, with price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, positive MACD momentum, and an RSI of 63.9—though it is currently overbought (%K 100.0).
Technical strength suggests bullish momentum, but overbought conditions may limit near-term upside or trigger corrections.
No explicit news or sentiment data is available to assess external influences on the stock’s valuation.
Lack of news data means the stock’s performance is driven purely by technicals and fundamentals, which may limit broader market-driven catalysts.
The stock shows moderate volatility (ATR: 3.9%) and a high annualized return (78.2%) but with a substantial drawdown (45.2%), indicating a volatile risk-reward profile.
High drawdowns and volatility suggest the stock may experience significant price swings, requiring careful risk management.
StockIQ conclusion
MRIN.TA presents a mixed outlook with strong technical indicators supporting an uptrend, but concerns include overbought conditions, modest relative underperformance, and elevated historical volatility. The absence of news-driven catalysts means the stock’s trajectory remains dependent on fundamentals and technical strength. While the risk-reward profile is intriguing, investors should monitor for overbought corrections and external developments that could alter the current momentum.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
12d ago · $44.51
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 30 to 55 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
63
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING MRIN.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
24
Fundamentals
—
Technical
63
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+5
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here suggests **FOMO** is dominant, fueled by strong momentum (+13.6% ROC) and elevated volume (1.61x average). The RSI (64) and Bollinger %B (1.06) indicate overbought conditions, while neutral sentiment (50/100) prevents panic. Herding is modest but present, as the stock’s outperformance today (+3.3%) contrasts with peers. The key question: *Will traders sustain momentum or pivot if RSI nears overbought extremes?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 07:17 PM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies that rely on technical or cyclical signals and those that demand deep fundamental or valuation scrutiny. Jesse Livermore and Charles Mackay both lean positive, with Livermore’s score (73) highlighting a favorable price trend and Mackay’s (71) ruling out obvious crowd-driven mania—suggesting momentum or relative calm in the market’s perception. Meanwhile, Howard Marks (68) sees manageable risk, while the remaining investors—particularly Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen—all hit a wall due to insufficient data, leaving their verdicts effectively neutral. On the cautionary end, Gerald Loeb (37) and Morgan Housel (3) flag red flags, with Loeb’s risk aversion and Housel’s volatility concerns contrasting sharply with the more optimistic technical readings. The split underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in its price action or whether its lack of transparent fundamentals makes it a speculative gamble.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 31
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 17
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 14
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 253 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
37.60 ₪
Range Bottom
47.21 ₪
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | 54.750 ₪ |
| 8.6.2026 | 69.055 ₪ |
| 7.6.2026 | 69.055 ₪ |
| 9.4.2026 | 27.283 ₪ |
| 8.4.2026 | 27.283 ₪ |
| 10.12.2025 | 54.674 ₪ |
| 9.12.2025 | 54.674 ₪ |
| 27.8.2025 | 54.680 ₪ |
| 26.8.2025 | 54.680 ₪ |
| 11.6.2025 | 36.526 ₪ |
| 10.6.2025 | 36.526 ₪ |
| 8.4.2025 | 26.622 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for More Investment House Ltd (MRIN.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for MRIN.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
MRIN.TA's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; RSI 56.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 200-day average; -2.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — MRIN.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology