Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Aerospace & Defense · Aerospace & Defense · NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.
$364.64
▲ $9.01 (+2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$355.28 - $366.98
52-Week Range
$192.33 - $448.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.11.2026
Support
$349.71
Resistance
$448.85
+82.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 179.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $44.43 vs. price $364.64 (-87.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (70/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
35
Risk
62
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
72
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Based on the provided sources, there is **no recent English-language media coverage** specifically mentioning **Moog Inc.** in August 2026. The headlines focus on unrelated topics, such as crypto expansion, political announcements, economic trends, and corporate earnings, with no direct references to Moog’s operations, financials, or developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Moog Inc. News trend score: 80. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
72
Technical
35
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
69
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are anchored to a detached narrative (narrative gap: 23) where extreme valuation (+732% above DCF) and slight price strength (+1.6% above 200-day avg) fuel overconfidence (45) and euphoria (31). The disconnect between fundamentals (-3.1% vs. +0.1% EPS growth) and price action hints at selective optimism, while minimal support distance (3.0%) may reinforce anchoring. The key open question is whether traders will adjust expectations as valuation strains against reality. Low volume (0.93x avg) and muted volatility (0.77x ATR) reduce urgency, but the gap between narrative and reality (23) remains a potential pressure point.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:48 AM
What could change this?
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jack Schwager — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for MOG-A reflects a clash between cyclical, growth-oriented, and value-driven methodologies. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score and bullish cycle position contrast sharply with Benjamin Graham’s near-failure of defensive metrics, illustrating a split between those who prioritize market timing (like Nelson) and those who demand deep valuation moats (like Graham). Meanwhile, long-term buy-and-hold advocates like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Jack Schwager see potential in the stock’s fundamentals, while more cautious investors—such as Howard Marks and Peter Lynch—warn of overvaluation or lackluster growth. The middle ground, occupied by Fisher, Loeb, and Veblen, suggests the stock is solid but not exceptional, highlighting a consensus that it’s neither a slam dunk nor a red flag—just a moderate play.
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 89
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 67
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 63
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 60
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 35
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 23
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
27.4%
Operating Margin
11.6%
Net Margin
6.1%
EBITDA Margin
14.3%
ROE
11.8%
ROA
5.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.42
Cash
$62.01M
Total Debt
$945.69M
Current Ratio
2.12
Debt/Equity
0.47
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.300 |
| 12.5.2026 | $0.300 |
| 17.2.2026 | $0.300 |
| 8.12.2025 | $0.290 |
| 8.8.2025 | $0.290 |
| 9.5.2025 | $0.290 |
| 7.2.2025 | $0.290 |
| 21.11.2024 | $0.280 |
| 16.8.2024 | $0.280 |
| 9.5.2024 | $0.280 |
| 8.2.2024 | $0.280 |
| 21.11.2023 | $0.270 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$364.64
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$44.43
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-87.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.3% | $139.07M | $127.59M |
| 2 | 6.9% | $148.64M | $125.11M |
| 3 | 5.4% | $156.70M | $121.00M |
| 4 | 4.0% | $162.91M | $115.41M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $166.98M | $108.53M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$128.35M
Terminal Value
$2.63B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.71B
Enterprise Value
$2.31B
Net Debt
$883.67M
Equity Value
$1.43B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$62.11
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$33.79
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 13 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo Finance Video · 28.8.2026
CNW Group · 28.8.2026
PR Newswire · 28.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 28.8.2026
CNW Group · 28.8.2026
Yahoo Finance · 28.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 28.8.2026
CNW Group · 28.8.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 28.8.2026
CNW Group · 28.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 26.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 26.8.2026
Quartz · 26.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 26.8.2026
TheStreet · 26.8.2026
Yahoo Finance · 26.8.2026
Motley Fool · 26.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Moog Inc (MOG-A) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MOG-A currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MOG-A's estimated fair value is $44.43, which is 87.8% below the current price of $364.64. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MOG-A's technical score is 35/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 179.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.47.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $44.43 vs. price $364.64 (-87.8%); Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — MOG-A has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FISHBACK DONALD R | Gift | 11.9.2026 | 45 | -45 | — |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 185 | -185 | $414.28 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 247 | -247 | $416.49 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 483 | -483 | $417.39 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 20 | -20 | $418.11 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 413 | -413 | $412.48 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 242 | -242 | $413.56 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 275 | -275 | $415.21 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 510 | -510 | $411.00 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 225 | -225 | $409.81 |
| Scannell John | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $410.97 |
| FISHBACK DONALD R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| FISHBACK DONALD R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $71.65 |
| FISHBACK DONALD R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.7.2026 | 2,962 | -2,962 | $428.40 |
| Scannell John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | — |
| Scannell John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.6.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $71.65 |
| Scannell John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.6.2026 | 5,972 | -5,972 | $416.00 |
| Scannell John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.6.2026 | 46,358 | +10,000 | $71.65 |
| Scannell John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.6.2026 | 40,386 | -5,972 | $416.00 |
| Scannell John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | — |
| WILKINSON PAUL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| WILKINSON PAUL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.6.2026 | 584 | -584 | $430.54 |
| WILKINSON PAUL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $71.65 |
| WILKINSON PAUL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 8,644 | +1,000 | $71.65 |
| WILKINSON PAUL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.6.2026 | 8,060 | -584 | $430.54 |
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology