Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
405.00 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:14 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
403.30 ₪ - 410.50 ₪
52-Week Range
360.00 ₪ - 479.00 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
385.50 ₪
Resistance
438.30 ₪
MLSR.TA is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+9.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
CMF (money flow)
CMF 20 days: 0.30
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
MLSR.TA’s **investorScore of 63** reflects a mixed technical backdrop with moderate risk and limited news-driven momentum. The stock demonstrates clear bullish technical signals—price levels remain firmly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, and rising volume supports the uptrend, all of which suggest sustained upward momentum. However, the RSI (73.5) and %K (91.5) readings indicate the stock is nearing overbought territory, signaling potential short-term exhaustion. Risk metrics, while not extreme, reveal a Calmar ratio of 1.27 (indicating moderate volatility relative to returns) and a 17.5% historical drawdown, which underscores the need for caution. The lack of news-driven evidence further weighs on the score, as there are no recent material developments to substantiate the technical strength. Overall, the stock’s moderate rating stems from a balance of bullish technicals offset by overbought conditions and limited external catalysts.
The stock exhibits strong bullish momentum with price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and rising volume, but RSI and %K readings indicate overbought conditions.
These technical signals are critical for assessing short-term trend strength and potential reversal risks.
There are no recent news-driven data points or material events to analyze for this stock.
News sentiment often drives market reactions and validates or invalidates technical trends.
The ATR is 2.4% of price, and the Calmar ratio (1.27) reflects moderate volatility with a 17.5% historical drawdown, suggesting controlled but not negligible risk.
Risk metrics help gauge the stock’s resilience to downturns and its long-term sustainability.
StockIQ conclusion
MLSR.TA presents a **moderate** profile driven by robust technical indicators, including sustained price momentum and rising volume, but its score is tempered by overbought conditions and a lack of news-driven support. While the stock’s risk metrics are manageable, the absence of external validation and relative underperformance against the index introduce caution. Investors should monitor whether the technical strength persists or if overbought conditions lead to a correction.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
31
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
19
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING MLSR.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
19
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
38
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (79) reflects traders fixating on the 1.0% resistance gap, likely setting a mental threshold for entry or exit. FOMO (45) and herding (46) signals suggest some chasing activity, but the narrow narrative gap (3) implies limited overconfidence or euphoria. The key question is whether the stock can sustain momentum past resistance or if traders will abandon positions if it fails. Low panic (2) and neutral sentiment (50/100) suggest no extreme distress, but anchoring could trigger abrupt shifts if the level is breached.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:54 PM
What could change this?
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with stark contrasts between cautious optimism and outright skepticism. The highest-scoring approaches—Edgar Lawrence Smith (100) and Charles Mackay (70)—suggest it could fit niche criteria, either due to Smith’s focus on dividend potential (despite data gaps) or Mackay’s absence of crowd-driven mania. Meanwhile, risk-aware investors like Howard Marks (69) and Gerald Loeb (54) see it as moderately tolerable, though not a slam dunk, while Jesse Livermore’s neutral stance (62) reflects his reluctance to bet on unclear trends. At the other end, the lowest scorers—Nelson (0) and Schwager (32)—flag red flags, with Nelson warning of overbought conditions and Schwager’s disciplined wizards dismissing it outright. The middle ground, from Graham to Lynch, is dominated by ‘not enough data’ verdicts, illustrating how fundamental gaps leave even core methodologies unable to form a definitive view.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 37
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
385.50 ₪
Range Bottom
438.30 ₪
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | 188.675 ₪ |
| 29.5.2026 | 188.678 ₪ |
| 28.5.2026 | 188.678 ₪ |
| 25.3.2026 | 188.710 ₪ |
| 24.3.2026 | 188.710 ₪ |
| 2.12.2025 | 188.838 ₪ |
| 1.12.2025 | 188.838 ₪ |
| 21.8.2025 | 188.854 ₪ |
| 20.8.2025 | 188.854 ₪ |
| 28.5.2025 | 189.138 ₪ |
| 27.5.2025 | 189.138 ₪ |
| 18.3.2025 | 189.140 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Melisron Ltd (MLSR.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for MLSR.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
MLSR.TA's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: CMF 20 days: 0.30.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — MLSR.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology