Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
459.20 ₪
▲ 8.50 ₪ (+1.9%)
Market data updated: 09/16 06:37 PM
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
448.00 ₪ - 461.90 ₪
52-Week Range
157.60 ₪ - 714.00 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
MGOR.TA is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+199.2% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 4/12 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.39 (3y annualized return 88.0% / max drawdown 36.9%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.3% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
MGOR.TA’s overall investor score of **58** reflects a mixed technical and fundamental profile, where short-term momentum and trend strength partially offset structural concerns. The stock exhibits a **strong uptrend**—confirmed by its position above the 50-day moving average, positive MACD histogram, and ADX reading of 26.3—suggesting disciplined buying pressure. However, its **RSI (72.5) and %K (93.6) readings** indicate overbought conditions, while the **3-month underperformance (-12.4% vs. index)** and **subpar 200-day average alignment** introduce caution. The **Calmar ratio (2.58)**—though impressive—highlights volatility (36.9% max drawdown), and the **ATR (4.0% of price)** underscores persistent price swings. News sentiment remains neutral (score: 50), leaving the narrative open to external catalysts.
The stock shows **short-term strength** (above 50-day SMA, positive MACD, ADX 26.3) but **overbought signals** (RSI 72.5, %K 93.6) and **medium-term weakness** (below 200-day SMA).
Short-term momentum is validated, but overbought conditions and lagging 200-day alignment may signal a near-term pullback or consolidation.
No recent news data is provided, resulting in a neutral score of 50 with no directional evidence.
Lack of news context means the stock’s trajectory depends entirely on technical and fundamental factors, leaving room for surprise.
The **Calmar ratio (2.58)** suggests high returns but **volatility risk** (36.9% max drawdown), while the **ATR (4.0%)** indicates frequent price fluctuations.
Investors must weigh the potential for outsized gains against the likelihood of sharp drawdowns and volatility.
StockIQ conclusion
MGOR.TA presents a **contrarian opportunity with mixed signals**: short-term technicals are robust, but overbought conditions, medium-term weakness, and volatility risks create uncertainty. The stock’s high Calmar ratio and trend strength appeal to momentum investors, but the lack of news context and persistent underperformance demand caution. Without external catalysts or a shift in technical alignment, the current profile remains speculative, favoring selective, high-conviction participation.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
11d ago · $511.00
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 14 to 48 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
40
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING MGOR.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
5
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
72
Fundamentals
—
Technical
40
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-6
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here suggests a **FOMO-driven rally**—momentum, volume, and overbought conditions align with speculative buying, while the 3-month underperformance hints at loss aversion still lurking. The narrative gap (8 points) implies traders may be overestimating the stock’s upside relative to fundamentals. Key tension: Is this momentum self-sustaining or will loss-averse sellers re-enter if momentum stalls? The absence of herding or panic signals stability, but the RSI’s extreme position raises caution.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 11:32 AM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that early‑to‑mid cycle and crowd‑sentiment metrics (Mackay, Marks‑cycle, Marks) give relatively high scores, indicating no obvious overvaluation or mania, while the lack of dividend, balance‑sheet, and growth data forces value‑oriented thinkers like Graham, Fisher, and Lynch into a neutral 50‑point placeholder. In contrast, trend‑following and risk‑focused frameworks (Livermore, Schwager, Loeb) assign markedly lower scores, reflecting their concern over a negative price trend and perceived capital risk. The efficient‑market viewpoint (Malkiel/Bogle) also rates the case as weak, suggesting a passive index would be preferable. Finally, Housel’s volatility‑centric lens yields a zero, highlighting that the stock’s price swings could erode patient investors’ resolve.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 87
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 83
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 253 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.8.2026 | 131.072 ₪ |
| 1.6.2026 | 104.872 ₪ |
| 31.5.2026 | 104.872 ₪ |
| 10.3.2026 | 190.668 ₪ |
| 9.3.2026 | 190.668 ₪ |
| 13.8.2025 | 163.700 ₪ |
| 12.8.2025 | 163.700 ₪ |
| 12.3.2025 | 191.193 ₪ |
| 11.3.2025 | 191.193 ₪ |
| 22.8.2024 | 136.602 ₪ |
| 21.8.2024 | 136.602 ₪ |
| 1.4.2024 | 136.602 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Mega Or Holdings Ltd (MGOR.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for MGOR.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
MGOR.TA's technical score is 40/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.39 (3y annualized return 88.0% / max drawdown 36.9%); MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; ROC 12 days: 0.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.3% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — MGOR.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology