Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$6.12
▼ $0.07 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:29 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$6.05B
Day Range
$6.05 - $6.41
52-Week Range
$5.93 - $19.98
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$5.93
Resistance
$9.07
JOBY is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-58.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 39183.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$17.41 vs. price $6.12 (-384.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
34
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
21
Risk
40
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Joby Aviation has centered on its financial struggles and strategic shifts ahead of commercialization. The company’s stock has declined sharply—down 16.5% since its last earnings report and nearly 50% over a year—despite raising its full-year revenue outlook. A $500 million defense contract is expected to nearly double revenue starting in 2027, but investors remain cautious as the company prepares for its first paying passenger flights. Market focus also includes broader industry dynamics, with Joby’s stock dropping alongside competitors amid near-term commercialization expectations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Joby Aviation, Inc.. News trend score: 32. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 5 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
87
Psychology
74
Fundamentals
30
Technical
21
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-39%
Market Narrative
27
Fundamental Reality
87
Narrative Gap
-60
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (53) reflects a market behavior where traders cling to positions despite a prolonged drawdown (-22.8% in three months), likely due to reluctance to realize losses. The muted volume (0.99x avg) and proximity to support (3.4%) further indicate caution rather than aggressive selling. Meanwhile, **Anchoring** (33) suggests traders may treat the current level as a psychological floor, while **Panic Selling** (23) remains subdued due to low volatility (0.76x ATR). The key open question is whether the narrative gap (-45) between reality (87) and narrative (42) will force a re-evaluation of risk—could a break below support trigger a shift from loss aversion to panic?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:33 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Joby Aviation is burning over $200 million a quarter. Here's how long the cash actually lasts."
"A $500 million defense deal stands to roughly double the air taxi company's revenue base -- starting in 2027."
"The market is repricing the bill that comes before the first paying passenger in one of its own aircraft."
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for JOBY reflects deep methodological contrasts between investors prioritizing resilience, momentum, and structural advantages versus those focused on valuation discipline, risk aversion, or market efficiency. Bagehot and Nelson’s high scores highlight liquidity and cyclical positioning as strengths, suggesting they’d see stability and timing as key advantages—even if the stock isn’t cheap. In contrast, Graham, Loeb, and Housel’s low scores stem from strict defensive criteria, risk thresholds, or patience for volatility, dismissing it as either overvalued or prone to panic-driven exits. Meanwhile, Fisher and Lynch’s middling scores point to a lack of the transformative growth or undervaluation they demand, while Livermore’s extreme caution aligns with a bearish trend interpretation. The split underscores how some methodologies favor speculative resilience (e.g., cycle positioning) while others demand ironclad fundamentals or contrarian patience.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 48
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 29
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-1346.9%
Net Margin
-1740.5%
EBITDA Margin
-1271.8%
ROE
-66.0%
ROA
-51.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.13
Cash
$240.81M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
24.09
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$6.12
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$17.41
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-384.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-704.76M | $-646.57M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-841.31M | $-708.12M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-956.99M | $-738.97M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-1.03B | $-733.04M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.06B | $-689.33M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-563.81M
Terminal Value
$-16.73B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-10.87B
Enterprise Value
$-14.39B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-14.39B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.71
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 7 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Business Wire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.9.2026
Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 34/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
JOBY currently scores 34/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, JOBY's estimated fair value is -$17.41, which is 384.5% below the current price of $6.12. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
JOBY's technical score is 21/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 39183.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 24.09.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$17.41 vs. price $6.12 (-384.5%); Operating margin: -1346.9% (negative); Net margin: -1740.5% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for JOBY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evans Aicha | Gift | 4.9.2026 | 24,606 | -24,606 | — |
| Evans Aicha | Gift | 4.9.2026 | 24,606 | +24,606 | — |
| Brumana Rodrigo | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 8,898 | -8,898 | $6.89 |
| Brumana Rodrigo | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 37,831 | -37,831 | $6.77 |
| Sciarra Paul Cahill | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 62,500 | -62,500 | $6.68 |
| Brumana Rodrigo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 73,421 | -73,421 | — |
| Brumana Rodrigo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 73,421 | +73,421 | — |
| Bowles Gregory | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 191,986 | -4,575 | $7.23 |
| Bowles Gregory | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 4,575 | -4,575 | $7.23 |
| Bowles Gregory | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 196,561 | -3,531 | $7.34 |
| Bowles Gregory | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 3,531 | -3,531 | $7.34 |
| Bowles Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 200,092 | +11,156 | — |
| Bowles Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 22,312 | -11,156 | — |
| Bowles Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 11,156 | -11,156 | — |
| Bowles Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 11,156 | +11,156 | — |
| Bevirt JoeBen | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 596,667 | -596,667 | $7.87 |
| Sciarra Paul Cahill | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 62,500 | -62,500 | $7.96 |
| Sciarra Paul Cahill | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 55,765,557 | -62,500 | $7.96 |
| Bevirt JoeBen | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 596,666 | -596,666 | $7.75 |
| Bevirt JoeBen | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 58,410,711 | -596,666 | $7.75 |
| DeHoff Kate | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 14,240 | -14,240 | $7.73 |
| DeHoff Kate | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 180,179 | -14,240 | $7.73 |
| Allison Eric | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 27,932 | -27,932 | $7.53 |
| DeHoff Kate | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 8,381 | -8,381 | $7.53 |
| DeHoff Kate | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 194,419 | -8,381 | $7.53 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
113,291,836 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 108,255,624 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology