Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Construction · ·
26.22 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:06 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
25.79 ₪ - 26.79 ₪
52-Week Range
19.19 ₪ - 31.08 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
21.34 ₪
Resistance
27.40 ₪
+37.1% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 6/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
INRM.TA demonstrates a robust technical profile, scoring **82** in this category due to its clear upward momentum. The stock sits comfortably above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling sustained bullish momentum, while the positive MACD histogram reinforces this trend. However, the RSI (70.3) and %K (87.9) readings indicate overbought conditions, which may suggest near-term consolidation or a pullback. The **news** category scores **50**, reflecting a neutral stance with no available recent sentiment or fundamental data to influence the analysis. Risk metrics are moderately balanced: the ATR (3.3%) suggests manageable volatility, but the Calmar ratio (1.21) highlights a historically high drawdown (27.8%) relative to its 3-year annualized return (33.5%), indicating potential volatility risk despite strong returns.
The stock exhibits strong bullish momentum with prices above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an ADX of 36.9, but RSI and %K readings indicate overbought conditions.
Technical strength signals sustained upward momentum, but overbought indicators may signal potential short-term correction or consolidation.
No available news or fundamental data points are provided to assess sentiment or external influences on the stock.
Lack of news data means the analysis relies solely on technical and risk metrics, limiting broader context.
The ATR (3.3%) suggests moderate volatility, but the Calmar ratio (1.21) reflects a high drawdown risk (27.8%) relative to its 33.5% annualized return over three years.
While volatility is controlled, the risk-reward balance is skewed by past drawdowns, indicating potential downside exposure.
StockIQ conclusion
INRM.TA presents a **STRONG** technical profile with clear upward momentum, supported by positive momentum indicators and relative outperformance. However, overbought conditions and historical drawdown risk temper optimism, while the lack of news or fundamental data introduces uncertainty. The stock’s strength lies in its directional clarity, but investors should monitor overbought signals and volatility metrics for potential shifts. Without additional context, the analysis remains technically driven, with risk mitigated by moderate volatility but tempered by past drawdowns.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202658
This Week
70
7D Ago
↓ -12
Weakening
Technical
63
7D Ago: 82
↓ -19
News
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
58 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
70
$26.32
Now
58
$26.22
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
63
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING INRM.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
8
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
63
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-7
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a blend of **FOMO-driven chasing** (strong momentum, overbought RSI) and **herding** (minor underperformance vs. peers), while **anchoring** to resistance keeps participants fixated on short-term levels. The narrative-reality gap (16) hints at potential misalignment between optimism and fundamentals, though no clear panic or euphoria dominates. The key question: *Will momentum sustain despite modest sentiment, or will anchoring near resistance trigger profit-taking?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:38 PM
What could change this?
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 35/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each methodology, the model estimates that the high score from Edgar Lawrence Smith (100) reflects a lack of dividend and growth data rather than a strong endorsement, while Charles Mackay’s 80 indicates his crowd‑sentiment lens sees no obvious mania. Howard Marks’ moderate 66 suggests his risk‑adjusted, cycle‑aware view finds the price reasonably priced, whereas the classic value‑oriented investors such as Graham, Fisher, Lynch and Bagehot all sit at the midpoint (50) because they lack sufficient balance‑sheet, growth or valuation inputs to form a decisive read. The efficient‑market perspective of Malkiel & Bogle (49) and Nelson (49) similarly deem the evidence for out‑performing an index weak, and Loeb (48) and Livermore (47) flag modest risk and no clear trend. Finally, the more behavior‑focused lenses of Housel (36) and Schwager (35) highlight volatility and an absent setup, recommending a cautious stance. Together, the spread of scores illustrates how data gaps and differing analytic emphases produce a spectrum of moderate to neutral conclusions rather than a unified bullish or bearish call.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 49
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 254 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | 14.403 ₪ |
| 15.6.2026 | 12.786 ₪ |
| 14.6.2026 | 12.786 ₪ |
| 27.3.2026 | 14.870 ₪ |
| 26.3.2026 | 14.870 ₪ |
| 10.12.2025 | 13.418 ₪ |
| 9.12.2025 | 13.418 ₪ |
| 28.8.2025 | 12.887 ₪ |
| 27.8.2025 | 12.887 ₪ |
| 29.5.2025 | 11.284 ₪ |
| 28.5.2025 | 11.284 ₪ |
| 6.4.2025 | 9.424 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Inrom Construction Industries Ltd (INRM.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for INRM.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
INRM.TA's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 59.4 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; ROC 12 days: -0.9%.
Yes — INRM.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology