Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Construction · ·
56.97 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:32 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
56.85 ₪ - 58.69 ₪
52-Week Range
50.80 ₪ - 84.50 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
50.80 ₪
Resistance
66.59 ₪
-12.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
CMF (money flow)
CMF 20 days: 0.21
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 4.0% / max drawdown 33.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Ashgad Holding’s (ASHG.TA) overall investor score of 60 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile, tempered by a neutral news environment. The technical category scores 67, driven by positive momentum indicators such as the MACD histogram and RSI (63.1), alongside a strong uptrend confirmed by the price exceeding the 50-day average and ADX (33.3). However, the stock’s position below the 200-day average and overbought %K (93.4) introduce short-term caution, while declining volume suggests potential weakening institutional or retail interest. The risk category scores 42, heavily influenced by a high max drawdown (33.0%) relative to its 3-year annualized return (7.5%), yielding a Calmar ratio of 0.23—indicating volatility sensitivity. The news category remains unscored due to a lack of available evidence, leaving market sentiment and external factors unquantified in this analysis.
The stock exhibits strong short-term momentum (MACD positive, RSI 63.1) and an uptrend (price above 50-day average, ADX 33.3), but is overbought (%K 93.4) and below its 200-day average, with declining volume.
Short-term strength may attract traders, but overbought conditions and volume trends could signal a near-term pullback or consolidation.
No quantifiable news or sentiment data is available to assess external factors influencing the stock.
Lack of news context means potential catalysts—positive or negative—are unaccounted for in this analysis.
The stock demonstrates high volatility (Calmar 0.23) with a 33.0% max drawdown over 3 years, despite a 7.5% annualized return, indicating sensitivity to market downturns.
Investors should weigh the risk of significant drawdowns against the modest long-term return, especially in volatile market conditions.
StockIQ conclusion
Ashgad Holding (ASHG.TA) presents a nuanced profile with technical indicators suggesting short-term strength but tempered by structural risks and unquantified news factors. The stock’s position above its 50-day average and positive momentum metrics indicate potential for continued gains, but overbought conditions, high volatility, and declining volume introduce caution. Investors should monitor volume trends and external developments closely, as these could meaningfully alter the risk-reward balance.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
33
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
17d ago · $60.46
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 2 to 33 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
24
Risk
42
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING ASHG.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
56
Fundamentals
—
Technical
24
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
36
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant FOMO state reflects a momentum-driven rally (13.1% ROC) with technical signals near overbought (RSI 63, %B 0.96), suggesting traders chase gains despite mixed sentiment (neutral 50/100). Loss aversion (40) persists due to the -9.2% 3-month decline, creating a tension between urgency and caution. Herding (13) hints at relative underperformance, while euphoria (13) is muted by the stock’s distance below its 200-day average. The key question: will momentum sustain or trigger profit-taking as traders reconcile FOMO with lingering loss aversion?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:14 AM
What could change this?
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark divide between methodologies, with some frameworks seeing potential while others flag it as risky or volatile. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests no obvious crowd-driven mania, aligning with his focus on avoiding speculative bubbles, whereas Howard Marks’ slightly lower but still positive score indicates a balanced risk assessment—though his market-cycle variant dips into neutral territory, hinting at mid-cycle caution. Meanwhile, the majority of investors—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen—can’t form a definitive opinion due to insufficient data, leaving their models neutral. On the other end, the lowest scores from Housel, Nelson, and Loeb paint a picture of volatility and overvaluation risks, reflecting their emphasis on patience, cycle timing, and capital preservation. The contrast between Marks’ measured optimism and Loeb’s outright warning underscores whether this stock is a calculated bet or a speculative gamble.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 86
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 27
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 6.4.2026 | 89.663 ₪ |
| 5.4.2026 | 89.663 ₪ |
| 2.4.2025 | 71.766 ₪ |
| 1.4.2025 | 71.766 ₪ |
| 30.3.2023 | 197.576 ₪ |
| 29.3.2023 | 197.576 ₪ |
| 6.9.2022 | 118.548 ₪ |
| 5.9.2022 | 118.548 ₪ |
| 5.4.2022 | 197.580 ₪ |
| 4.4.2022 | 197.580 ₪ |
| 6.12.2021 | 99.013 ₪ |
| 5.12.2021 | 99.013 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Ashtrom Group Ltd (ASHG.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ASHG.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ASHG.TA's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: CMF 20 days: 0.21.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 4.0% / max drawdown 33.0%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — ASHG.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology