Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$23.97
▲ $0.04 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:54 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.72B
Day Range
$23.36 - $24.24
52-Week Range
$9.36 - $30.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$21.59
Resistance
$30.06
IMNM is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
+143.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 51.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$30.34 vs. price $23.97 (-226.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
29
Risk
48
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Immunome, Inc. has primarily centered on its upcoming investor conference presentation at the H.C. Wainwright 28th Annual Global Investment Conference, with analysts maintaining positive outlooks. Notable events include raised price targets from Wedbush ($35) and Truist ($38), alongside a missed earnings estimate in Q2 2026, reporting a loss of $0.65 per share. The company’s focus on developing targeted cancer therapies remains a recurring theme.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Immunome, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
32
Fundamentals
30
Technical
29
Valuation
38
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+28%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s detached euphoria (score 22) stands out, driven by a 19% premium above its 200-day average despite weak momentum (-4.4% ROC). This suggests investors may be ignoring fundamental or technical red flags, possibly due to narrative-driven optimism. The lack of dominant panic or FOMO (scores 5 and 7) implies neither urgency nor herd behavior is driving decisions. The key question: *Will this valuation gap persist, or will reality (e.g., earnings, macro shifts) force a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:11 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Truist Securities analyst maintains Immunome with a Buy and raises price target to $38"
"Wedbush raises price target on Immunome from $31 to $35"
"First patient dosed in Phase 1 trial evaluating IM-3050"
"Immunome Q2 EPS $(0.65) misses $(0.52) estimate by 25%"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing resilience and opportunity while others flag severe risks. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights its liquidity and credit strength, suggesting it could weather financial stress—an outlier among the crowd. Meanwhile, Samuel Nelson’s moderate optimism and Charles Mackay’s caution hint at speculative momentum, though even they acknowledge growing excitement. The middle tier—Livermore, Lynch, and Marks—cautions against overpaying, noting that while growth exists, the stock’s valuation may already reflect it, leaving little margin for error. On the other end, Fisher, Smith, and Housel dismiss it outright, with Fisher rejecting its quality and Housel warning of volatility that could deter patient investors. The contrast underscores a fundamental tension: is this a defensive haven (Bagehot) or a speculative gamble (Mackay) with no clear edge for disciplined, long-term strategies?
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 78
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 54
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 30
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 17
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-3228.8%
Net Margin
-3060.0%
EBITDA Margin
-3193.3%
ROE
-33.5%
ROA
-31.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.43
Cash
$653.48M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
14.69
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$23.97
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$30.34
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-226.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-190.57M | $-174.84M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-184.62M | $-155.39M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-182.31M | $-140.78M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-183.45M | $-129.96M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-188.04M | $-122.21M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-200.60M
Terminal Value
$-2.97B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.93B
Enterprise Value
$-2.65B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-2.65B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.26
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.26
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 11 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
Business Wire · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
Business Wire · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
Business Wire · 20.7.2026
Motley Fool · 12.7.2026
Zacks · 10.7.2026
MT Newswires · 8.7.2026
Business Wire · 8.7.2026
MT Newswires · 8.7.2026
Immunome, Inc. (IMNM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IMNM currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, IMNM's estimated fair value is -$30.34, which is 226.6% below the current price of $23.97. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
IMNM's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 51.4%; Net income growth: 27.5%; Current ratio: 14.69.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$30.34 vs. price $23.97 (-226.6%); Operating margin: -3228.8% (negative); Net margin: -3060.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for IMNM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 92,211 | -11,048 | $27.25 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 11,048 | -11,048 | $27.25 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 0 | -62,291 | $26.23 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 62,291 | -62,291 | $26.23 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 62,291 | -10,125 | $26.07 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 10,125 | -10,125 | $26.07 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 72,416 | -15,248 | $26.06 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 15,248 | -15,248 | $26.06 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 87,664 | -20,840 | $26.06 |
| Barchas Isaac | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 20,840 | -20,840 | $26.06 |
| Horn Kinney | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 90,616 | -90,616 | $25.09 |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 50,366 | -50,366 | — |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 50,366 | +50,366 | $12.92 |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 40,250 | +40,250 | $10.60 |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 40,250 | -40,250 | — |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 50,366 | +50,366 | $12.92 |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 90,616 | +40,250 | $10.60 |
| Horn Kinney | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 0 | -90,616 | $25.09 |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 78,542 | -50,366 | — |
| Horn Kinney | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 120,750 | -40,250 | — |
| Stoneman Sandra G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.7.2026 | 76,500 | +76,500 | — |
| Lechleider Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.7.2026 | 108,000 | +108,000 | — |
| Horn Kinney | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.7.2026 | 62,500 | +62,500 | — |
| Horn Kinney | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.7.2026 | 31,250 | +31,250 | — |
| Higgins Jack | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.7.2026 | 60,250 | +38,250 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,634,596 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 17,981,724 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology