Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
38.27 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:36 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
37.78 ₪ - 38.54 ₪
52-Week Range
34.19 ₪ - 44.90 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
34.54 ₪
Resistance
39.84 ₪
GVYM.TA is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+4.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 4/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is below the 200-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
GVYM.TA demonstrates a robust technical foundation, with a score of 91 reflecting strong bullish signals. The stock’s price remains firmly above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, while the recent crossover of the 50-day SMA over the 200-day SMA signals a potential shift to an uptrend. Positive momentum is further supported by a rising MACD histogram and an RSI of 69.9, indicating healthy upward momentum without extreme overvaluation. However, the overall investor score of 76—driven primarily by technical strength—is tempered by a neutral news sentiment score of 50 and moderate risk metrics. The ATR of 2.8% suggests moderate volatility, while the Calmar ratio of 0.73 highlights a historically high return (18.0% annualized) but also a significant drawdown risk (24.5%).
The stock exhibits clear bullish momentum with price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a recent SMA crossover, positive MACD, and an RSI of 69.9—all indicators of strong upward technical strength.
Technical strength is critical for validating sustained price appreciation and reducing short-term volatility risk.
No explicit news data is provided, resulting in a neutral score of 50 with no evidence of positive or negative sentiment.
Lack of news context means external catalysts or headwinds cannot be assessed, leaving the stock’s trajectory dependent on technicals alone.
The ATR of 2.8% indicates moderate volatility, while the Calmar ratio of 0.73 reflects a historically high return (18.0% annualized) but also a substantial drawdown (24.5%), signaling potential downside risk.
High returns paired with significant drawdowns suggest volatility and potential downside risk, requiring careful risk management.
StockIQ conclusion
GVYM.TA presents a compelling technical profile with strong bullish signals, supported by sustained price action above key moving averages and positive momentum indicators. However, the lack of news context and moderate risk metrics—particularly the high drawdown risk—introduce uncertainty. Investors should monitor volume trends and potential overbought corrections while remaining aware of the stock’s historical volatility. The overall score reflects a balanced view of strength in technicals but with notable limitations in broader risk and sentiment assessment.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
49
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING GVYM.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
5
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
49
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by anchoring, as the stock’s position near resistance (1.8%) likely constrains trading activity. FOMO signals (momentum, volume) suggest some chasing, but the narrative gap (3-point divergence) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and fundamentals. Herding is muted, as the stock lags peers, implying selective participation rather than blind following. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor or retreat if momentum stalls?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:52 PM
What could change this?
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for GVYM.TA reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Charles Mackay’s high score (74) suggests no crowd-driven mania, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-zero (7) flags an overbought cycle—highlighting how behavioral and cyclical perspectives clash. Howard Marks (69) and Gerald Loeb (49) both acknowledge moderate risk but diverge: Marks sees it as reasonably priced, whereas Loeb’s caution hints at a more conservative risk tolerance. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen—all score at 50 with data limitations, underscoring that this stock lacks the concrete fundamentals or historical patterns needed for a definitive read. The contrast between Livermore’s neutral stance (61) and Schwager’s outright dismissal (27) further illustrates how trend-following discipline versus systematic discipline can lead to starkly different conclusions.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 90
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 52
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 24
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 5
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 5.8.2026 | 27.199 ₪ |
| 18.5.2026 | 27.203 ₪ |
| 17.5.2026 | 27.203 ₪ |
| 12.2.2026 | 27.211 ₪ |
| 11.2.2026 | 27.211 ₪ |
| 13.11.2025 | 31.755 ₪ |
| 12.11.2025 | 31.755 ₪ |
| 7.8.2025 | 38.563 ₪ |
| 6.8.2025 | 38.563 ₪ |
| 16.5.2025 | 31.177 ₪ |
| 15.5.2025 | 31.177 ₪ |
| 12.2.2025 | 29.509 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Gav Yam Land Corp Ltd (GVYM.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for GVYM.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
GVYM.TA's technical score is 49/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; RSI 55.2 — healthy positive momentum; +5.8% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — GVYM.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology