Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$24.69
▲ $2.41 (+10.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:07 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$22.75 - $24.75
52-Week Range
$16.43 - $45.92
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$18.22
Resistance
$27.52
-32.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/21 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 41.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -0.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
52
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
16
Risk
40
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
38
Institutional
67
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Galaxy Digital Inc.** is limited and indirect, as none of the provided sources explicitly mention the company. The headlines instead focus on unrelated topics—such as Arthur Hayes’ $2M Uniswap (UNI) purchase, American Bitcoin Corp.’s public anniversary, institutional crypto growth amid congressional inaction, Texas energy project approvals, and Bitcoin’s price surge. No direct news about Galaxy Digital’s operations, financials, or recent developments appears in these sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Galaxy Digital Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
86
Fundamentals
38
Technical
16
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-35%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant FOMO state reflects a market primed to chase gains, driven by strong momentum, positive sentiment, and technical overbought conditions. Overconfidence and euphoria scores suggest traders may be detached from fundamentals, while anchoring near resistance hints at potential near-term resistance. The large narrative gap (45 points) indicates a disconnect between market enthusiasm and underlying reality, raising the open question: *Will momentum sustain, or will traders pivot when fundamentals fail to justify the rally?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Crypto Stocks Jump After Bitcoin Rises 5%"
"Galaxy Digital's Helios II data center is expected to be classified within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Batch Zero Base Load classification"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with only Peter Lynch’s model showing any enthusiasm—though even he admits there’s insufficient growth data to justify a real investment. Meanwhile, the rest of the frameworks range from cautious to outright dismissive, with Fisher, Smith, and Livermore offering lukewarm approvals (scores in the low 50s) for its solid but unexceptional qualities, while the majority—including Graham, Marks, and Loeb—flag serious red flags. The contrast highlights a tension between growth potential (where Lynch and Fisher might see *some* merit) and risk aversion (where Graham, Nelson, and Housel see clear warning signs). Even the efficient-market proponents question whether the stock’s case is strong enough to beat passive indexing, underscoring a consensus that this isn’t a clear-cut opportunity for most historical investors.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 36
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 32
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 29
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 28
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 17
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 8
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-0.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-12.3%
ROA
-2.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$1.25B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.60
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$5.34
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.07
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 13 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Blockspace · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Blockspace · 9.9.2026
Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GLXY currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GLXY's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 41.8%; Current ratio: 1.60; Current ratio: 1.60.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -0.4% (negative); ATR: 7.9% of price; Calmar: -0.03 (3y annualized return -1.7% / max drawdown 60.7%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GLXY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedrich Matthew W. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 4,993 | -4,993 | $27.03 |
| Friedrich Matthew W. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 30,630 | -30,630 | $26.33 |
| Brown Erin Elizabeth | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,951 | -1,951 | $24.60 |
| Novogratz Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 4,683 | -4,683 | $24.60 |
| Ferraro Christopher C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | — |
| Ferraro Christopher C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $4.83 |
| DEASON DOUGLAS R | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 12,000 | +12,000 | $21.54 |
| DEASON DOUGLAS R | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 71,000 | +12,000 | $21.54 |
| Ferraro Christopher C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | — |
| BANDROWCZAK STEVEN JOHN | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 5,100 | +5,100 | $19.63 |
| Ferraro Christopher C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $4.83 |
| Ferraro Christopher C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 908,292 | +50,000 | $4.83 |
| Ferraro Christopher C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 950,000 | -50,000 | — |
| BANDROWCZAK STEVEN JOHN | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 39,186 | +5,100 | $19.63 |
| BANDROWCZAK STEVEN JOHN | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 34,086 | +34,086 | — |
| Koutsouras Bill | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 7,866 | +7,866 | — |
| DAFFEY MICHAEL D | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 7,866 | +7,866 | — |
| Rico Robert Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 710 | -710 | — |
| Paquette Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Rico Robert Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 9,095 | +9,095 | $11.77 |
| Rico Robert Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 9,095 | -9,095 | — |
| Rico Robert Daniel | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 9,095 | -9,095 | $19.66 |
| Rico Robert Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 18,784 | +18,784 | $9.63 |
| DEASON DOUGLAS R | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 7,866 | +7,866 | — |
| Rico Robert Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 710 | +710 | $4.83 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
30,189,757 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 28,336,500 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology