Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$16.45
▼ $0.00 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:07 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$90.55M
Day Range
$16.45 - $16.49
52-Week Range
$12.00 - $16.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$15.76
Resistance
$16.99
+29.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $32.80 vs. price $16.45 (+99.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -7.5%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
6d ago · $16.99
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 0 to 27 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
55
Value
62
Momentum
45
Risk
64
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
55
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of First US Bancshares, Inc. has highlighted its strong financial performance and shareholder-friendly initiatives. The company announced a cash dividend of $0.07 per share in August 2026, while its second-quarter earnings saw a dramatic 933% year-over-year increase in EPS ($0.31) alongside a modest revenue rise to $10.818 million. Earlier, it had also declared a dividend in May 2026, reflecting consistent efforts to return value to investors amid robust earnings growth.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about First US Bancshares, Inc.. News trend score: 26. Reason: 4 of the last 5 articles are negative, versus 0 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
55
Technical
45
Valuation
62
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
22
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
-17
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant psychological state here is **anchoring**, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (3.1%) suggests traders may be fixated on past highs despite muted momentum and peer underperformance. The narrative gap (-17) further implies a disconnect between market perception (lower reality score) and potential reality, reinforcing anchoring as traders may cling to outdated reference points. Low FOMO, panic, or herding scores indicate a detached, non-emotional environment. The key question: *Will traders break free from resistance anchoring, or will they hold near 3.1% below it?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:03 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"declared a cash dividend of $0.07 per share"
"EPS $0.31 Up From $0.03 YoY, 933.33% increase"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that value‑oriented investors such as Morgan Housel (94), Charles Mackay (90) and Benjamin Graham’s defensive framework (88) view the stock favorably, emphasizing its quiet, non‑speculative character. Howard Marks (83) and Gerald Loeb (79) also see a reasonably priced risk profile, though Marks’ market‑cycle lens drops to 58, suggesting some cyclical uncertainty. In contrast, growth‑focused criteria from Peter Lynch (20), Jack Schwager (20) and Thorstein Veblen (31) flag the company as lacking the exceptional quality or sensible growth motivation they require. Bagehot’s perfect score is offset by a lack of balance‑sheet data, and the efficient‑market view (44) notes limited evidence for out‑performing an index, explaining the overall divergence among the methodologies.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 95
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 88
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 83
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 80
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 78
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 52
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 31
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$15.76
Range Bottom
$16.99
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
525.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
5.7%
ROA
0.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.03
Cash
$73.55M
Total Debt
$10.95M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.10
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.070 |
| 12.6.2026 | $0.070 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.070 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.070 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.070 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.070 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.070 |
| 12.9.2025 | $0.070 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.070 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.070 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.070 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.070 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$16.45
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$32.80
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+99.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.3% | $9.06M | $8.31M |
| 2 | 0.4% | $9.10M | $7.66M |
| 3 | 1.1% | $9.20M | $7.10M |
| 4 | 1.8% | $9.36M | $6.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $9.60M | $6.24M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$9.08M
Terminal Value
$151.37M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$98.38M
Enterprise Value
$134.32M
Net Debt
$-62.60M
Equity Value
$196.93M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$17.60
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.36
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 5 articles.
PR Newswire · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
PR Newswire · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
PR Newswire · 20.5.2026
First US Bancshares, Inc. (FUSB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FUSB currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FUSB's estimated fair value is $32.80, which is 99.4% above the current price of $16.45. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FUSB's technical score is 45/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $32.80 vs. price $16.45 (+99.4%); Free cash flow growth: 60.5%; ATR: 1.4% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -7.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -24.8%; Net income growth: -26.7%.
Yes — FUSB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 14 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 11.9.2026 | 238 | +238 | $16.45 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 10.9.2026 | 669 | +669 | $16.46 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 9.9.2026 | 877 | +877 | $16.47 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 284 | +284 | $16.47 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 4.9.2026 | 113 | +113 | $16.45 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 3.9.2026 | 412 | +412 | $16.40 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 288 | +288 | $16.40 |
| FIELD Robert C | Open Market Purchase | 1.9.2026 | 3,300 | +3,300 | $16.39 |
| Pierce Staci | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 245 | +245 | $16.51 |
| Pierce Staci | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 10,850 | +245 | $16.51 |
| Pierce Staci | Open Market Purchase | 4.8.2026 | 619 | +619 | $16.48 |
| Pierce Staci | Open Market Purchase | 4.8.2026 | 10,605 | +619 | $16.48 |
| Pierce Staci | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 136 | +136 | $16.53 |
| Pierce Staci | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 9,986 | +136 | $16.53 |
| Dozier Beverly J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 2,550 | +2,550 | $11.71 |
| Mabowitz Eric H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.7.2026 | 2,813 | -2,813 | $16.95 |
| Elley Thomas S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 6,300 | +6,300 | $11.71 |
| Dozier Beverly J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 2,550 | +2,550 | $10.01 |
| Elley Thomas S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 6,300 | -6,300 | — |
| Mabowitz Eric H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 3,600 | -3,600 | — |
| Dozier Beverly J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.7.2026 | 1,867 | -1,867 | $16.95 |
| Mabowitz Eric H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.7.2026 | 2,132 | -2,132 | $16.95 |
| Mabowitz Eric H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Dozier Beverly J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.7.2026 | 2,034 | -2,034 | $16.95 |
| Dozier Beverly J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $14.11 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,278 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,944 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
14.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology