Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$78.29
▼ $1.21 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:36 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$77.98 - $79.30
52-Week Range
$48.47 - $93.43
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$69.96
Resistance
$93.43
+16.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 68.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 4.85
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
36
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) has centered on its strong financial performance and strategic growth, particularly after its Q2 2026 earnings. Analysts highlight its first organic member growth in five years, driven by gains in housing, HVAC services, and renewals, alongside improvements in digital engagement and targeted marketing. While some analysts maintain a neutral stance with a $95 price target, others praise its potential as a "buy the bottom" stock, emphasizing its multi-brand strategy and expanding consumer and real estate channels.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Frontdoor, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
26
Fundamentals
69
Technical
36
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
FTDR’s psychology is dominated by **Euphoria**, where price momentum and extreme sentiment outweigh valuation disconnects. The 19.6% premium to the 200-day average, combined with perfect news sentiment, suggests traders are prioritizing trend over fundamentals—a classic euphoric bias. The key question is whether this detachment from DCF fair value (-5%) will persist or if a correction will reveal the gap. FOMO’s mild presence (13) hints at late-cycle participation, but the absence of panic or herding keeps the narrative speculative. The 20-point narrative gap (58 vs. 38) further implies traders are overestimating tailwinds.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:02 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Member growth returned for first time in five years"
"strong operational execution... improvements in digital engagement and targeted marketing"
"improving real estate-channel conditions... strong renewal rates"
"Member growth returned... driven by dynamic pricing"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Philip Fisher standing out as the most bullish—citing it as a 'solid' pick, though not exceptional by his standards. Meanwhile, the efficient-market camp and Charles Mackay see it as a speculative bet, with Mackay noting crowd excitement and Malkiel/Bogle questioning whether active selection adds value. At the other end, Benjamin Graham and his defensive criteria dismiss it outright, while Howard Marks and Peter Lynch warn of overvaluation or lack of growth justification. The middle ground is crowded: Veblen and Nelson see mixed signals, while Schwager and Loeb would avoid it entirely due to perceived risks or poor setups. This range reflects a stock that may appeal to growth-oriented investors but fails the rigorous screens of value or risk-averse strategists.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 66
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 30
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 28
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 23
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 22
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
55.3%
Operating Margin
16.2%
Net Margin
12.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
105.0%
ROA
11.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.48
Cash
$566.00M
Total Debt
$1.17B
Current Ratio
1.55
Debt/Equity
4.85
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$78.29
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$85.45
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+9.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.1% | $421.47M | $386.67M |
| 2 | 6.7% | $449.60M | $378.42M |
| 3 | 5.3% | $473.36M | $365.52M |
| 4 | 3.9% | $491.78M | $348.39M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $504.08M | $327.62M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$390.00M
Terminal Value
$7.95B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.17B
Enterprise Value
$6.97B
Net Debt
$607.00M
Equity Value
$6.37B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.41
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.24
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
StockStory · 15.8.2026
Yahoo · 15.8.2026
MarketBeat · 14.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
StockStory · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FTDR currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FTDR's estimated fair value is $85.45, which is 9.1% above the current price of $78.29. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FTDR's technical score is 36/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 68.8%; Return on equity (ROE): 105.0% — strong; Current ratio: 1.55.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 4.85; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FTDR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanks Sally J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 578 | -258 | $82.75 |
| Shanks Sally J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 836 | +836 | — |
| Shanks Sally J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 837 | -836 | — |
| Shanks Sally J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 836 | +836 | — |
| Shanks Sally J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 836 | -836 | — |
| Shanks Sally J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 258 | -258 | $82.75 |
| Collins Kathryn M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | — |
| Collins Kathryn M | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $88.98 |
| Collins Kathryn M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $26.42 |
| Iverson Evan | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 18,190 | -18,190 | $85.50 |
| Fiarman Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 13,000 | -13,000 | $85.11 |
| Fiarman Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 20,023 | -13,000 | $85.11 |
| Collins Kathryn M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 30,322 | +10,000 | $26.42 |
| Collins Kathryn M | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 20,322 | -10,000 | $88.98 |
| Collins Kathryn M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 12,299 | -10,000 | — |
| Iverson Evan | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 214 | -18,190 | $85.50 |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 4,309 | -4,309 | — |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 5,746 | -5,746 | — |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 1,928 | -1,928 | $74.79 |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 4,309 | +4,309 | — |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 2,571 | -2,571 | $74.79 |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 5,746 | +5,746 | — |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 17,153 | +5,746 | — |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 14,582 | -2,571 | $74.79 |
| Ganesh Balakrishnan A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 18,891 | +4,309 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,014,642 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,038,763 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology