Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Communication Services · ·
$209.70
▼ $0.21 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:47 PM
Fundamentals updated: 08/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$209.70 - $210.20
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$199.45
Resistance
$209.98
EA is a stock from the Communication Services sector — Telecom, media, and internet/social platforms — revenue from advertising and subscriptions.
+25.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 0.3% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $209.70
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 39 to 68 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
79
Risk
64
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
68
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING EA...
The provided sources do not mention Electronic Arts directly, focusing instead on unrelated companies like mining firms (Newmont, Agnico, AngloGold Ashanti), industrial equipment (Eaton), and unrelated market reports. As a result, there is no recent media coverage of Electronic Arts available in these headlines. No further details can be summarized.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Electronic Arts. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
60
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
97
Fundamentals
68
Technical
79
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme anchoring (95) dominates, with traders fixating on the 0.2% gap to resistance—ignoring overbought conditions (RSI 90) and modest momentum (+0.9% ROC). FOMO (39) and euphoria (38) coexist but are secondary, while herding (32) remains muted. The 25-point narrative gap (62 vs. 37) implies optimism may outpace fundamentals. The key question: will traders break from resistance or double down on recent highs?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:32 AM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits historical methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score of 99 suggests it aligns perfectly with his patient, compounding philosophy, while the vast majority—including Graham, Fisher, and even Marks—flag it as risky or overvalued. The contrast stems from Housel’s focus on long-term fundamentals and emotional resilience, which likely sees steady growth and stability, whereas value-oriented investors like Graham or Fisher prioritize deep discounts, defensive metrics, or quality growth signatures that this stock fails to meet. Meanwhile, cyclical or market-timing frameworks (e.g., Nelson, Marks’ late-cycle view) warn of overbought conditions or stretched valuations, while behavioral models (Veblen, Mackay) detect speculative tendencies. The divide highlights whether the stock’s strengths lie in its durability for patient holders (Housel) or its exposure to liquidity risks, crowded excitement, or inflated expectations (the rest).
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 99
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 81
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 45
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 43
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 29
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 23
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 22
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 21
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 20
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 8
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 3
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 241 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
79.0%
Operating Margin
15.4%
Net Margin
11.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
13.1%
ROA
6.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.55
Cash
$2.86B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.05
Debt/Equity
0.22
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 27.5.2026 | $0.190 |
| 26.5.2026 | $0.190 |
| 25.2.2026 | $0.190 |
| 24.2.2026 | $0.190 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.190 |
| 2.12.2025 | $0.190 |
| 27.8.2025 | $0.190 |
| 26.8.2025 | $0.190 |
| 28.5.2025 | $0.190 |
| 27.5.2025 | $0.190 |
| 26.2.2025 | $0.190 |
| 25.2.2025 | $0.190 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$26.95
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$26.17
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
CNW Group · 28.8.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 28.8.2026
Trefis · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.8.2026
Trefis · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 25.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Electronic Arts (EA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EA currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EA's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 0.3% of price; Debt/equity: 0.22; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -17.4%; Net income growth: -20.9%.
Yes — EA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canfield Stuart | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 51,307 | -51,307 | — |
| Canfield Stuart | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 52,947 | -52,947 | — |
| Canfield Stuart | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 60,309 | -60,309 | — |
| Canfield Stuart | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 14,119 | -14,119 | — |
| Canfield Stuart | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 7,756 | -7,756 | — |
| Canfield Stuart | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 27,598 | -27,598 | $210.00 |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 1,213 | -1,213 | — |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 1,213 | -1,213 | — |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 1,454 | -1,454 | — |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 5,415 | -5,415 | — |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 2,426 | -2,426 | — |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 1,454 | -1,454 | — |
| Kelly Eric Charles | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 8,739 | -8,739 | $210.00 |
| Miele Laura | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 66,183 | -66,183 | — |
| Miele Laura | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 64,134 | -64,134 | — |
| Miele Laura | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 60,309 | -60,309 | — |
| Miele Laura | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 17,648 | -17,648 | — |
| Miele Laura | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 9,695 | -9,695 | — |
| Miele Laura | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 71,013 | -71,013 | $210.00 |
| Schatz Jacob J. | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 40,924 | -40,924 | — |
| Schatz Jacob J. | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 32,066 | -32,066 | — |
| Schatz Jacob J. | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 33,091 | -33,091 | — |
| Schatz Jacob J. | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 13,236 | -13,236 | — |
| Schatz Jacob J. | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 7,271 | -7,271 | — |
| Schatz Jacob J. | Disposition to the Company | 4.8.2026 | 42,287 | -42,287 | $210.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,731,853 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 8,723,759 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology