Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.63
▲ $0.09 (+2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$603.11M
Day Range
$3.51 - $3.71
52-Week Range
$1.70 - $4.12
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$2.43
Resistance
$3.90
DDD is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+47.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 109.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$7.33 vs. price $3.63 (-301.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $3.63
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.63
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 43 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
75
Risk
46
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **3D Systems Corporation** has centered on its strategic shifts and partnerships to drive growth in additive manufacturing (AM). Analysts highlight its leaner cost structure and upward price targets, while the company’s collaboration with the **Savannah River National Laboratory**—through a **CRADA agreement**—aims to advance 3D printing for advanced energy and national security applications, including nuclear systems. Stock performance has fluctuated, with a recent dip since earnings, and insider selling noted. Additionally, market reports project strong growth in **3D-printed medical implants**, particularly polypropylene-based solutions, by 2035.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about 3D Systems Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
44
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
69
Technical
75
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
73
Fundamental Reality
44
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Confirmation Bias** (score 47) reflects a disconnect between rosy narratives (75) and weaker fundamentals (39), particularly stagnant revenue (-0.1%) despite modest margin improvement. While **FOMO** (34) and **Euphoria** (43) drive buying pressure—evidenced by momentum, volume, and extreme sentiment—**Overconfidence** (22) emerges from price outpacing earnings growth. The key question: will traders double down on narratives or reassess fundamentals when momentum stalls? The absence of panic or herding suggests complacency, not urgency.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 11:29 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Signs research agreement with Savannah River National Laboratory to advance 3D printing for advanced energy and national security applications"
"Global 3D printed implant polypropylenes market size projected to reach USD 2.92 billion by 2035 at a 9.2% CAGR"
"Defense/CapEx recovery and dental demand rebound driving momentum"
"Analysts back leaner cost base after fair value rise"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score (90) standing out as an outlier, praising its liquidity and resilience in a credit crunch—a stark contrast to Philip Fisher’s near-rejection (9), which dismisses it for lacking the signature quality and growth Fisher demanded. Growth-focused investors like Peter Lynch (74) see upside potential, arguing the price hasn’t yet reflected its growth, while value-oriented approaches like Benjamin Graham’s (67) and his Enterprising Investor variant (42) remain lukewarm, citing mixed or insufficient valuation signals. Meanwhile, cyclical and market-timing frameworks—such as Nelson (29), Marks’ late-cycle warning (26), and Housel’s volatility concern (26)—flag overbought conditions or timing risks, while behavioral economists like Mackay (40) and Livermore (61) question whether the stock’s momentum is driven by rational fundamentals or speculative fervor. The split reflects a tension between liquidity/credit strength (Bagehot) and either growth potential (Lynch) or deep skepticism about valuation, quality, or timing (Fisher, Marks, Housel).
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 82
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 68
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 68
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 63
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 23
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 10
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 8
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
33.9%
Operating Margin
13.4%
Net Margin
7.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.4%
ROA
5.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.23
Cash
$95.64M
Total Debt
$90.34M
Current Ratio
2.87
Debt/Equity
0.42
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.63
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$7.33
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-301.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-92.88M | $-85.21M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-89.98M | $-75.74M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-88.86M | $-68.61M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-89.41M | $-63.34M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-91.65M | $-59.56M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-97.77M
Terminal Value
$-1.45B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-939.28M
Enterprise Value
$-1.29B
Net Debt
$-5.30M
Equity Value
$-1.29B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.65
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Motley Fool · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
3D Systems Corporation (DDD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DDD currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DDD's estimated fair value is -$7.33, which is 301.9% below the current price of $3.63. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DDD's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 109.8%; Net income growth: 111.7%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$7.33 vs. price $3.63 (-301.9%); ATR: 5.7% of price; Calmar: -0.12 (3y annualized return -9.8% / max drawdown 79.8%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DDD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAVES JEFFREY A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 39,959 | -39,959 | $3.38 |
| Nordstrom Phyllis B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 39,517 | -39,517 | $3.38 |
| HULL CHARLES W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 4,943 | -4,943 | $3.38 |
| Puthenveetil Reji | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 15,984 | -15,984 | $3.38 |
| ZUIKER JOSEPH R. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 6,689 | -6,689 | $3.38 |
| WRIGHT ANDREW WILLIAM BANASICK | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 5,818 | -5,818 | $3.38 |
| Nordstrom Phyllis B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 7,879 | -7,879 | $3.38 |
| GRAVES JEFFREY A | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 115,500 | -115,500 | $3.26 |
| ERICKSON THOMAS W | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| Tracy John J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| MCCLURE CHARLES G | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| Drayton Claudia | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| Padmanabhan Vasant | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| MOORE KEVIN S | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| KEVER JIM D | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| Clinton Malissia | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 45,731 | +45,731 | — |
| MCCLURE CHARLES G | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 227,848 | +45,731 | — |
| KEVER JIM D | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 560,650 | +45,731 | — |
| MOORE KEVIN S | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 179,734 | +45,731 | — |
| ERICKSON THOMAS W | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 395,178 | +45,731 | — |
| Tracy John J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 226,442 | +45,731 | — |
| Padmanabhan Vasant | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 192,915 | +45,731 | — |
| Drayton Claudia | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 174,369 | +45,731 | — |
| Clinton Malissia | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 200,669 | +45,731 | — |
| Puthenveetil Reji | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.4.2026 | 11,701 | -11,701 | $1.98 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
43,721,595 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 43,619,761 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 35.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology