Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$5.89
▼ $0.22 (-3.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:33 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.40B
Day Range
$5.82 - $6.13
52-Week Range
$4.92 - $9.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$5.07
Resistance
$7.55
DCH is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-6.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$8.96 vs. price $5.89 (-252.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
35
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
23
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Dauch Corporation has centered on its financial outlook and analyst reactions. The company has been featured at major industry conferences, including the Jefferies Global Industrials and J.P. Morgan Auto events, where executives likely discussed its strategic direction. Analysts have adjusted their price targets upward—from $6 to $9—while some, like RBC, highlight challenges in the second half of 2026, including competition from GM’s pickup truck launch. Earnings and cost concerns were also noted in Q2 updates.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dauch Corporation. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
26
Fundamentals
23
Technical
13
Valuation
38
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-7%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a dominant FOMO-driven rally, amplified by extreme bullish sentiment and strong momentum. The narrative gap and overconfidence in price vs. fundamentals indicate investors may be ignoring weak earnings growth. Key open question: Will momentum sustain despite the disconnect between price action and fundamentals? The lack of panic or loss aversion signals suggests no immediate reversal pressure, but confirmation bias could prolong the rally until reality catches up.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:51 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Barclays analyst raises price target from $8 to $9 (Benzinga, #5)"
"TD Cowen upgrades Dauch to Buy from Hold (MT Newswires, #1)"
"Dauch to present at Jefferies Global Industrials Conference (Yahoo, #2)"
"GM’s pickup truck launch poses headwinds for Dauch (MT Newswires, #8)"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing strong potential while others flag severe red flags. Jesse Livermore and Benjamin Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* approach both rate it highly—Livermore’s technical bias aligns with a favorable trend, while Graham’s deeper statistical discount suggests undervaluation for a bold investor. Yet, even Graham’s stricter *Defensive Investor* standard falls short, signaling inconsistency. On the opposite end, the majority of methodologies—from Howard Marks’ late-cycle caution to Morgan Housel’s volatility warning—paint a far more pessimistic picture, with many dismissing it outright for lacking stability, growth, or fundamental strength. The contrast underscores how technical traders and contrarian value hunters might see opportunity where cyclical, behavioral, or long-term investors see only risk.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 78
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 68
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 54
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 29
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
12.1%
Operating Margin
1.9%
Net Margin
-0.3%
EBITDA Margin
9.8%
ROE
-3.1%
ROA
-0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.17
Cash
$708.90M
Total Debt
$4.09B
Current Ratio
2.95
Debt/Equity
6.40
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.89
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$8.96
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-252.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
0.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.3% | $155.52M | $142.68M |
| 2 | 0.8% | $156.81M | $131.99M |
| 3 | 1.4% | $158.99M | $122.77M |
| 4 | 1.9% | $162.07M | $114.82M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $166.13M | $107.97M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$155.10M
Terminal Value
$2.62B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.70B
Enterprise Value
$2.32B
Net Debt
$3.38B
Equity Value
$-1.06B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.41
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.76
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
PR Newswire · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
PR Newswire · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 9.8.2026
MarketBeat · 8.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
MT Newswires · 7.8.2026
Dauch Corporation (DCH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 35/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DCH currently scores 35/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DCH's estimated fair value is -$8.96, which is 252.2% below the current price of $5.89. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DCH's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 2.95; Current ratio: 2.95.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$8.96 vs. price $5.89 (-252.2%); Net margin: -0.3% (negative); ATR: 5.3% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DCH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kemp Terri M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 186,568 | +186,568 | — |
| Sherbin Joshua A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 45,455 | +45,455 | — |
| Sherbin Joshua A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 100,747 | +100,747 | — |
| Sherbin Joshua A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 45,455 | +45,455 | — |
| Sherbin Joshua A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 146,202 | +100,747 | — |
| Kemp Terri M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 637,231 | +186,568 | — |
| Miziolek Aleksandra A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| MacAulay Fiona M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Pierce Sandra E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Walker David B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| MCCASLIN JAMES A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Kozyra William Lawrence | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Mackenzie Smith Simon | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Grayson-Caprio Terry | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Valenti Samuel III | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Parker Herbert K | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Lyons Peter David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 29,773 | +29,773 | — |
| Mackenzie Smith Simon | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 44,167 | +29,773 | — |
| Walker David B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 64,773 | +29,773 | — |
| MacAulay Fiona M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 30,846 | +29,773 | — |
| Kozyra William Lawrence | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 128,864 | +29,773 | — |
| MCCASLIN JAMES A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 247,283 | +29,773 | — |
| Parker Herbert K | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 209,726 | +29,773 | — |
| Grayson-Caprio Terry | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 69,247 | +29,773 | — |
| Miziolek Aleksandra A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 89,739 | +29,773 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,592,076 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 22,880,107 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology