Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Miscellaneous · ·
$63.20
▼ $0.29 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:44 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.15B
Day Range
$62.14 - $64.90
52-Week Range
$54.48 - $92.09
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$62.14
Resistance
$92.08
+5.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 677.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
19
Risk
50
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
43
Institutional
29
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated has primarily focused on its financial and market perception, with analysts repeatedly rating its stock as a "buy" amid discussions about its valuation and potential undervaluation. The company also received tariff refunds, highlighting its operations in Stark County. Additionally, Diebold Nixdorf earned recognition for excellence in human capital management and partnered with Thomaston Savings Bank for advanced ATM solutions. Its Q2 2026 earnings call was also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated. News trend score: 62. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
66
Fundamentals
43
Technical
19
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-25%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for DBD suggests a dominant **herding** dynamic, likely driven by relative underperformance against peers (+0.7% vs. +1.7%). Loss aversion (36) and anchoring (15) further imply traders are cautious, possibly waiting for confirmation before committing. The narrative gap (14) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and reality, but herding remains the most active bias. The key question is whether DBD’s underperformance will persist or if it triggers a shift in behavior as traders reassess.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 01:07 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wall Street analysts see Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) as a Buy"
"DDI Wins Gold and Silver in 2026 Brandon Hall Group™ HCM Excellence Awards"
"Diebold Nixdorf are among companies that received tariff refunds"
"Thomaston Savings Bank advances self-service banking with Diebold Nixdorf DN Series® ATMs"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DBD reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors assess risk, growth potential, and market positioning. The highest-scoring methodologies—Charles Mackay, Howard Marks (Market Cycle), and Jack Schwager—all lean bullish, emphasizing either the absence of crowd-driven mania, favorable cycle positioning, or disciplined reward/risk tradeoffs. In contrast, the lowest scorers—Benjamin Graham (both versions), Philip Fisher, and Walter Bagehot—reject the stock outright, citing either lack of defensive value, insufficient quality/growth, or liquidity risks that would disqualify it under strict fundamental or structural criteria. Meanwhile, the middle-ground approaches (like Peter Lynch’s growth optimism or Thorstein Veblen’s caution) highlight a tension between perceived upside and unproven profitability, while efficient-market skeptics (Malkiel/Bogle) question whether the stock’s case justifies active selection over passive indexing.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 94
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 84
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 31
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 27
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 24
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.3%
Operating Margin
6.4%
Net Margin
2.5%
EBITDA Margin
9.7%
ROE
8.6%
ROA
2.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.57
Cash
$368.90M
Total Debt
$938.50M
Current Ratio
1.30
Debt/Equity
0.85
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$29.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$9.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 6 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockStory · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
The Repository · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 18.8.2026
PR Newswire · 11.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
PR Newswire · 3.8.2026
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated (DBD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DBD currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DBD's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 677.3%; Net income growth: 673.3%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; -26.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DBD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 15 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timko Thomas S | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 700 | +700 | $72.29 |
| Timko Thomas S | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 3,132 | +700 | $72.29 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 26.6.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | $84.80 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 2,741 | -2,741 | $85.06 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 4,204,432 | -2,741 | $85.06 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 228,723 | -228,723 | $83.95 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 4,207,173 | -228,723 | $83.95 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 1,765 | -1,765 | $83.91 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 4,435,896 | -1,765 | $83.91 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 159,675 | -159,675 | $82.12 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 4,437,661 | -159,675 | $82.12 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 1,108 | -1,108 | $82.06 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 4,597,336 | -1,108 | $82.06 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 17,660 | -17,660 | $82.08 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 4,598,444 | -17,660 | $82.08 |
| Millstreet Capital Management LLC | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 88,334 | -88,334 | $82.99 |
| Connolly Brian D | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 4,616,104 | -88,334 | $82.99 |
| Timko Thomas S | Gift | 3.6.2026 | 672 | +672 | — |
| Timko Thomas S | Gift | 3.6.2026 | 672 | -672 | — |
| Timko Thomas S | Gift | 3.6.2026 | 73,048 | -672 | — |
| Timko Thomas S | Gift | 3.6.2026 | 2,432 | +672 | — |
| Marquez Octavio | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2026 | 621 | +621 | $79.56 |
| Marquez Octavio | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2026 | 217,507 | +621 | $79.56 |
| Marquez Octavio | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 629 | +629 | $79.37 |
| Marquez Octavio | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 216,886 | +629 | $79.37 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,137,881 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,663,998 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology