Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Services · ·
426.90 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:47 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
416.80 ₪ - 428.60 ₪
52-Week Range
410.00 ₪ - 549.80 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
410.00 ₪
Resistance
466.00 ₪
-4.8% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
CMF (money flow)
CMF 20 days: 0.30
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 23.7%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
DANE.TA’s overall investor score of 59 reflects a mixed technical backdrop with moderate risk and limited news-driven catalysts. The stock demonstrates short-term strength, as evidenced by its position above the 50-day moving average, positive MACD histogram, and RSI of 62.5—indicators of healthy upward momentum. However, the price remains below the 200-day average, signaling a longer-term pullback, while the %K reading at 91.6 suggests overbought conditions that could trigger a near-term correction. Risk metrics reveal a moderate volatility profile, with a Calmar ratio of 0.52 (implying a 23.7% historical drawdown against a 12.3% annualized return), which balances potential reward with downside risk. The lack of news-driven evidence (score of 50) underscores that performance is primarily driven by technical factors rather than external catalysts.
The stock shows short-term bullish signals (price above 50-day MA, positive MACD, RSI 62.5) but is weighed down by a longer-term decline (below 200-day MA) and overbought conditions (%K 91.6).
Short-term momentum is validated, but overbought levels and the 200-day underperformance create potential near-term resistance.
No recent news or company-specific events are reflected in the data, resulting in a neutral news score of 50.
Lack of news-driven catalysts means the stock’s trajectory relies entirely on technical performance and market sentiment.
The ATR of 2.5% of price indicates moderate volatility, while the Calmar ratio of 0.52 suggests a historically volatile but rewarding return profile (12.3% annualized vs. 23.7% max drawdown).
The risk-reward balance is favorable but highlights the need for caution, as drawdowns could outweigh gains in adverse conditions.
StockIQ conclusion
DANE.TA presents a nuanced profile with short-term technical strength but structural long-term challenges. While indicators like the MACD and RSI suggest upward momentum, the stock’s position below the 200-day MA and overbought conditions introduce caution. Risk metrics indicate a volatile but historically rewarding profile, though drawdowns remain a notable downside. Without news-driven catalysts, the stock’s trajectory hinges on technical performance, making it suitable for traders focused on momentum but risky for long-term investors without clear catalysts.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
33
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
24
Risk
42
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING DANE.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
3
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
34
Fundamentals
—
Technical
24
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for DANE.TA suggests a **FOMO-dominated but restrained environment**, where positive momentum (+4.2% ROC) and moderate volume (0.93x avg) create cautious optimism. Anchoring (4.3% from resistance) hints traders may hesitate near key levels, while neutral sentiment (50/100) and low volatility (0.85x ATR) prevent extreme bias. The narrative gap (-1) implies slight misalignment, but no dominant psychological urgency emerges. The key question: *Will traders capitalize on momentum or wait for confirmation?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:12 PM
What could change this?
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts between methodologies that rely on qualitative or cyclical assessments versus those that demand concrete data. Charles Mackay’s high score (84) suggests no obvious crowd-driven mania, while Howard Marks’ slightly lower but still favorable score (73) indicates reasonable risk pricing—both approaches trust subjective or macro-level signals. In contrast, the cyclical perspective (Marks’ 57) and Nelson’s (7) flag mid-cycle or overbought conditions, signaling caution. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—from Graham to Fisher—return neutral scores (50) due to insufficient fundamental or valuation data, while Livermore (33) and Schwager (25) outright dismiss it as a poor trend or setup. The efficient-market camp (38) further undermines active selection, leaving only Smith (100) and Mackay as outliers favoring engagement, but only under very different assumptions.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 98
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 66
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | 512.000 ₪ |
| 29.5.2026 | 708.200 ₪ |
| 28.5.2026 | 708.200 ₪ |
| 30.3.2026 | 389.150 ₪ |
| 29.3.2026 | 389.150 ₪ |
| 1.12.2025 | 600.000 ₪ |
| 30.11.2025 | 600.000 ₪ |
| 28.8.2025 | 500.000 ₪ |
| 27.8.2025 | 500.000 ₪ |
| 29.5.2025 | 300.000 ₪ |
| 28.5.2025 | 300.000 ₪ |
| 3.12.2024 | 352.400 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Danel Adir Yeoshua Ltd (DANE.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for DANE.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
DANE.TA's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: CMF 20 days: 0.30.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 23.7%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — DANE.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology