Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$131.73
▲ $0.68 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:45 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$5.42B
Day Range
$130.15 - $132.91
52-Week Range
$107.44 - $160.47
Beta
—
Next Earnings
17.11.2026
Support
$124.56
Resistance
$152.67
CPA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+11.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 24.2% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.40 (3y annualized return 12.1% / max drawdown 30.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
65
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
63
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Copa Holdings, S.A. has centered on its stock performance and investor sentiment following its second-quarter 2026 earnings report, which saw an 8.9% decline since the last update. Analysts like Raymond James and UBS maintained a "Buy" rating but lowered their price targets from $195 to $185, reflecting cautious optimism. Additionally, the company announced a $1.71 per share dividend, drawing attention to its dividend yield and payout history amid broader airline industry challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Copa Holdings, S.A.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
42
Fundamentals
63
Technical
65
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are passively matching peers’ underperformance rather than aggressively chasing gains. The narrative gap (61 vs. 50) hints at optimism outpacing fundamentals, while low FOMO (13) and muted euphoria (17) imply restrained enthusiasm. Overconfidence (6) may emerge if momentum persists despite weak EPS growth. The key question: *Will traders exit herding if peers diverge further?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:25 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Raymond James lowers price target from $195 to $185"
"Copa Holdings SA announced a total dividend of $1.71 per share"
"Airline stocks to monitor as industry grapples with challenges"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between value-driven long-term investors and more cautious or market-neutral methodologies. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s near-unanimous 'buy and hold' endorsement (80) contrasts sharply with the skepticism of efficient-market theorists like Bogle and Malkiel (54), who see little evidence to justify picking it over a passive index. Meanwhile, growth-oriented analysts like Peter Lynch (68) and Thorstein Veblen (67) acknowledge potential but temper their enthusiasm, noting the stock’s price may already reflect its upside. Benjamin Graham’s stricter valuation tests (64) and his Enterprising Investor variant (43) further split the camp, while cyclical investors like Howard Marks (51) and Walter Bagehot (53) remain neutral, wary of overpaying or missing broader market trends. The divergence highlights whether this stock is a rare, undervalued gem (Smith) or a speculative bet with no clear edge (Livermore, Loeb).
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 80
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 71
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 68
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 64
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 53
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 49
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 23
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
24.2%
ROA
10.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$16.28
Cash
$382.55M
Total Debt
$1.81B
Current Ratio
1.31
Debt/Equity
0.65
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | $1.710 |
| 29.5.2026 | $1.710 |
| 28.5.2026 | $1.710 |
| 27.2.2026 | $1.710 |
| 26.2.2026 | $1.710 |
| 1.12.2025 | $1.610 |
| 30.11.2025 | $1.610 |
| 29.8.2025 | $1.610 |
| 28.8.2025 | $1.610 |
| 30.5.2025 | $1.610 |
| 29.5.2025 | $1.610 |
| 28.2.2025 | $1.610 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$67.27
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$67.27
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 11 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 8.8.2026
MarketBeat · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Copa Holdings, S.A. (CPA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CPA currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CPA's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 24.2% — strong; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.40 (3y annualized return 12.1% / max drawdown 30.0%); Price is below the 50-day average; -14.7% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — CPA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,503,142 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,296,460 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology