Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$42.61
▼ $0.29 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:30 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$42.37 - $42.85
52-Week Range
$40.03 - $59.66
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$40.03
Resistance
$47.24
CNM is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-15.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.37 (3y annualized return 14.4% / max drawdown 39.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
34
Risk
48
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
63
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) has centered on its upcoming Q2 earnings report and ongoing investor scrutiny over its stock valuation. Analysts debate whether the company’s shares—distributing water, wastewater, storm drainage, and fire protection products—trade at a premium to fair value, despite a strong five-year return of 61.8%. The stock has faced volatility, with a 15.06% decline over 90 days, while broader industry trends, including manufacturing growth and acquisitions, highlight CNM as a beneficiary of sector strength.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Core & Main, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 8 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
6
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
63
Technical
34
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+8
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests CNM’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, as the 3-month decline (-12%) aligns with risk-averse positioning. The lack of FOMO or euphoria (scores of 0) confirms no speculative momentum, while anchoring (score 9) hints at traders holding near support. The narrative gap (-1) implies minor misalignment, but the key question remains: will traders exit to lock losses or hold for a rebound? The absence of panic (score 10) suggests no extreme distress, but the low volume (1.00x average) may limit liquidity.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:47 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Core & Main stock trades at a premium to fair value (Simply Wall St.)"
"Core & Main stands to benefit as manufacturing activity supports growth (Zacks)"
"Core & Main falls more steeply than broader market (Yahoo)"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing it as a cautiously optimistic play while others flag it as a high-risk or overcomplicated bet. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology analysis and Thorstein Veblen’s value-creation alignment—suggest CNM lacks speculative frenzy or misalignment, implying a steadier foundation. Meanwhile, cycle-focused thinkers like Howard Marks and Samuel Armstrong Nelson lean positive, viewing it as undervalued or early in its upward trajectory. However, the majority of value-oriented and growth-driven frameworks—from Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria to Philip Fisher’s quality standards—reject it outright, citing weak fundamentals, volatility, or failure to meet their core thresholds. Even the efficient-market skeptics and volatility-averse investors like Morgan Housel and Peter Lynch dismiss it, leaving CNM as a stock that only appeals to those prioritizing macro trends or liquidity over traditional metrics.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 98
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 88
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 62
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 57
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 34
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 23
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 22
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
26.9%
Operating Margin
9.4%
Net Margin
5.8%
EBITDA Margin
12.0%
ROE
22.1%
ROA
7.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.32
Cash
$220.00M
Total Debt
$2.15B
Current Ratio
2.63
Debt/Equity
1.08
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$10.09
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$3.77
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 3 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CNM currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CNM's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 22.1% — strong; Current ratio: 2.63.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.37 (3y annualized return 14.4% / max drawdown 39.4%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CNM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harper Carla D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 242 | -242 | $46.32 |
| Harper Carla D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 13,064 | -242 | $46.32 |
| HUEBERT MICHAEL G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 1,301 | -1,301 | $43.75 |
| HUEBERT MICHAEL G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 24,036 | -1,301 | $43.75 |
| Hope James D | Open Market Purchase | 6.7.2026 | 2,067 | +2,067 | $46.01 |
| Hope James D | Open Market Purchase | 6.7.2026 | 11,805 | +2,067 | $46.01 |
| MAZZARELLA KATHLEEN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Amirthalingam Bhavani | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Buck Robert M | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Kimbrough Orvin T | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Gipson Dennis G | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| NEWMAN MARGARET | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Castellano James G | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Hope James D | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| Hardwick M Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 2,799 | +2,799 | — |
| MAZZARELLA KATHLEEN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 16,757 | +2,799 | — |
| Hope James D | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 9,738 | +2,799 | — |
| NEWMAN MARGARET | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 16,757 | +2,799 | — |
| Hardwick M Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 3,379 | +2,799 | — |
| Buck Robert M | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 15,849 | +2,799 | — |
| Amirthalingam Bhavani | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 17,955 | +2,799 | — |
| Kimbrough Orvin T | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 16,757 | +2,799 | — |
| Gipson Dennis G | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 16,757 | +2,799 | — |
| Castellano James G | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.6.2026 | 7,437 | +2,799 | — |
| Harper Carla D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.6.2026 | 568 | -568 | $47.25 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,254,792 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,268,016 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology